Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.85s

  • BOROUGH OF SEA BRIGHT VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SHORE REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2020

    As we explained in Borough of Seaside Park v. … Blanchard v. N.J. Dep't of Corr., 461 N.J. Super. 231, 237–38 (App. Div. 2019) (quoting Henry v. Rahway State Prison, 81 N.J. 571, 579–80 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • New Jersey Guar. Ass'n v. Ciani

    242 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 1990

    MALINAK, CITY OF EAST RUTHERFORD, CITY OF WALLINGTON, BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS COUNTY OF BERGEN, WALSH TRUCKING CO., OLD LANE BRYANT CLOTHING SHOP AND MAX'S BAR, INC. … Co. v. Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., 124 N.J. Super. 598 , 308 A. 2d 76 (Law Div. 1973).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Winters v. City of Jersey

    120 N.J. Super. 129 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 28, 1972

    A. 2A:53A-8 was applicable to a municipal hospital pointed out that Jersey City Medical Center was operated by a Board of Managers pursuant to the authority of N. J. S. A. 30:9-13 and 14; that it is required under N. J. … Sanzari v. Rosenfeld, 34 N. J. 128, 141 (1961); Tramutola v. Bortone, supra, 118 N. J. Super, at 512.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Thompson

    402 N.J. Super. 177 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 2008

    State v. … State v. Hinds, 143 N.J. 540, 549-51 , 674 A. 2d 161 (1996); State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Barnhart v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE, ETC., CIO

    10 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 5, 1950

    Super. 357 (1950) 76 A.2d 270 FLOYD BARNHART AND LAWRENCE DEANGELIS, PLAINTIFFS, v. … Gaestel v. Brotherhood of Painters, &c., 120 N.J. Eq. 358 ( Ch. 1936); Cameron v. International, &c., Union No. 384, 118 N.J. Eq. 11 ( E. & A. 1934); Harris v. Geier, 112 N.J. Eq. 99 ( Ch. 1932); Dragwa v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Manzo v. Eddinfield

    126 N.J. Super. 20 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1973

    Lemke v. Bailey, 41 N.J. 295, 301 (1963). … But the Fund answers the question in the affirmative, citing Gilbert v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board, 85 N.J. Super. 143 (App. Div. 1964), certif. den. 44 N.J. 403 (1965), Stupin v. Sanchez, 113 N J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Michael Miller v. Ernest Zagranichny

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 7, 2025

    Later in 2015, Musto filed a Brigantine Planning Board (Board) application seeking to subdivide his property into two residential parcels, which would have added a fourth house on the block. … We derive that the Board's resolution is compulsory on the parties. Cf. Aldrich v. Schwartz, 258 N.J. Super. 300, 310 (App. Div. 1992) ("[H]olding that [a subsequent landowner] is bound by the . . .

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of New Jersey v. Tony Canty

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2024

    State v. Brown, 236 N.J. 497, 518 (2019). In Giglio v. … Id. at 160 (quoting State v. Brown, 118 N.J. 595, 605 (1990)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Bank of New Jersey

    139 N.J. Super. 593 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1976

    State v. Profaci, supra . … Bucino v. Malone, 12 N.J. 330 (1953).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • CENTURY 21, ETC. VS. ST. CECELIA'S CHURCH, ETC. (L-4635-15, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 20, 2021

    ("Century") did not entitle Century to a commission on the Church's twenty-six-month no-rent lease of its school building to the Edison Board of Education. Century 21-Main St. Realty, Inc. v. St. … Despite the nomenclature, the Board did not hold over in the common-law sense. A landlord at common law may choose to deem a tenant who holds over as a tenant or a trespasser, Sheild v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kelleher v. Detroit Motors

    52 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 1958

    Kvedar v. Shapiro, supra ; Hartman v. Smith Sales, Inc., supra. … See Board of Education Township of Woodbridge v. Kane Acoustical Co., 51 N.J. Super. 319 ( App. Div. 1958).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2017

    In particular, Silver noted, id. at 50, that in Demech v. Board of Review, 167 N.J. Super. 35 (App. … Silver next addressed our opinion in Smith v. Board of Review, 281 N.J. Super. 426 (App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Capone v. Norton

    11 N.J. Super. 189 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1951

    Stephens v. Public Service Coord. Transport, 5 N.J. Super. 128 ( App. Div. 1949); Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co., 8 N.J. Super. 208 ( App. Div. 1950). … Cooper v. Shore Electric Co., 63 N.J.L. 558 ( E. & A. 1899); McStay v. Przychocki, 10 N.J. Super. 455 ( App. Div. Dec. 1950).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Int'l. Sch. Serv. v. W. Windsor Tp.

    412 N.J. Super. 511 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 2010

    In addition to serving as president of ISS and a board member of ISS and ISF, Dr. … Press v. Borough of Princeton, 35 N.J. 209, 214 , 172 A. 2d 420 (1961); Essex Props. Urban Renewal Assocs., Inc. v. City of Newark, 20 N.J.Tax 360, 365 (2002).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • RALPH HOLT VS. UPPER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (L-0157-17, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 2020

    Because the parties' arguments were not presented to the Board, they are matters outside the record that we cannot consider. See Schmidt v. … of Bergen Cty. v. Bd. of Adjustment, 60 N.J. Super. 569, 575-76 (App. Div. 1959) (stating "[j]udicial review of board of adjustment action is confined to the record made before the local board").

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of New Jersey v. Maurice D. Ross

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 2026

    . _______________________ Argued February 3, 2026 – Decided March 4, 2026 Before Judges Gooden Brown, Rose and DeAlmeida. … Mauriello testified he purchased his own BWC while working for the Newark Board of Education before he was employed by the NHA.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • ALFRED J. PETIT-CLAIR, JR. VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 27, 2020

    Co. v. … Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • JOSE VELAZQUEZ VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 2020

    Bumbaco v. Bd. of Trs. of Pub. Emps.' Ret. Sys., 325 N.J. Super. 90, 94 (App. Div. 1999). It is also well-settled the Board has the authority to reopen a decision upon a showing of good cause. Duvin v. … Ibid.; see e.g., Steinmann v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • JANET SADOWE, AS TRUSTEE, ETC. VS. AUTOZONE NORTHEAST, LLC (L-3221-17, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 2, 2020

    SADOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The Rules of Evidence are not binding on a planning board. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-10(e). The Board's reasonable judgment to accept or reject an expert's testimony is binding on appeal. Ocean County Cellular Tel. Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Menichetti v. Palermo Supply Co.

    396 N.J. Super. 118 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 10, 2007

    See also Davala v. … See Gorman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.