Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.86s
20 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 1952
Riverton Country Club v. Thomas, 141 N.J. Eq. 435, 440 ( Ch. 1948), affirmed on opinion below, 1 N.J. 508 ( Sup. Ct. 1948); Carpender v. New Brunswick, 135 N.J. … Eq. 397, 400 ( Ch. 1944); Board of Education, West Paterson v. Brophy, 90 N.J. Eq. *221 57, 62 ( Ch. 1919); 19 Am. Jur., Estates, sec. 65, p. 527; 2 Powell on Real Property (1952 ed. ), Cum.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn the Matter of Borough of Carteret and Local 67
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 2024
Orange v. … In the analogous context of decisions issued by Municipal Boards, we have stressed that Board members do not act individually. See Scully-Bozarth Post # 1817 of Veterans of Foreign Wars of U.S. v. Plan.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBielak v. Counties Contracting and Const. Co.
95 N.J. Super. 266 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 9, 1967
Div. 1948); *272 Estelle v. Board of Education of Borough of Red Bank, 14 N.J. 256 (1954); the employer, Eclipse, etc., Bendix Aviation Corp. v. Minter, 35 N.J. Super. 430 ( App. … See V. v. Long Branch Sewerage Auth., 86 N.J. Super. 56 ( App. Div. 1964); Eclipse, etc., Bendix Aviation Corp. v. Minter, supra .
Cited 1 timesPublished232 N.J. Super. 519 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 1988
The majority's reliance upon Estelle v. Board of Education of Red Bank, 14 N.J. 256 (1954), is misplaced. The recovery sought against defendant is not compensable under the act. … Keller v. Pastuch, 94 N.J.
Cited 7 timesPublished53 N.J. Super. 102 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 25, 1958
See Galler v. Slurzberg, 22 N.J. Super. 477 ( App. … See Andes v. Boyajian, 12 N.J. Super. 344 ( Ch. Div. 1951). Welsh v. Board of Education of Tewksbury Tp., 7 N.J. Super. 141 ( App. Div. 1950), is not to the contrary.
Cited 3 timesPublished317 N.J. Super. 16 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1998
Co. v. … Shuster v. Board of Educ. of Hardwick Twp., 8 N.J.Super. 415, 417-18 , 72 A. 2d 910 (Ch.Div.1950), aff'd, 17 N.J.Super. 357 , 86 A. 2d 16 (App.Div.1952).
Cited 31 timesPublished79 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 1963
He had been a member of the board of directors of a Philadelphia bank. In 1946 the Boardmans purchased a home as tenants by the entirety in Strathmere, Cape May County, New Jersey. … Super. 514 ( Law Div. 1959); Continos v. Parsekian, 68 N.J. Super. 54 ( App. Div. 1961); and Maddy v. Jones, 230 Md. 172 , 186 A. 2 d 482 ( Md. Ct. App. 1962). In Collins v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedALFRED J. PETIT-CLAIR, JR. VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 27, 2020
Co. v. … Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJANET SADOWE, AS TRUSTEE, ETC. VS. AUTOZONE NORTHEAST, LLC (L-3221-17, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 2, 2020
SADOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The Rules of Evidence are not binding on a planning board. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-10(e). The Board's reasonable judgment to accept or reject an expert's testimony is binding on appeal. Ocean County Cellular Tel. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTurer v. Ahavas Achem Anshe, Belleville
53 N.J. Super. 175 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1958
Prior to the decisions in Collopy v. Newark Eye and Ear Infirmary, 27 N.J. 29 (1958); Benton v. Y.M.C.A., 27 N.J. 67 (1958), and Dalton v. St. … Board of Education, Jersey City, 9 N.J. 241 (1952) the confusion disappears and the decision is further crystallized. Also, this case does not fall within the "legislative intent" exception of City of Newark v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMcGarrah v. STATE, DEPT. OF LAW
268 N.J. Super. 577 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1993
Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332-35 , 96 S.Ct. 893, 901-02 , 47 L.Ed. 2d 18, 31-33 (1976). If there are no material facts in dispute, a hearing is useless and unnecessary. See Dixon v. … See Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHonorable Dana L. Redd v. Vance Bowman
433 N.J. Super. 178 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 2013
(quoting Bosland v. Warnock Dodge Inc., 197 N.J. 543, 553 (2009)). … v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHamilton Amusement Center, Inc. v. Poritz
298 N.J. Super. 230 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1997
Thompson, 403 U.S. 217, 224 , 91 S.Ct. 1940, 1944 , 29 L.Ed.2d 438, 444 (1971); Two Guys from Harrison, Inc. v. Furman, 32 N.J. 199, 226 , 160 A.2d 265 (1960); Board of Rec. Commissioners, Rutherford v. … Informational material on the building, including the sign/reader board, shall be limited to the name of the theater, ownership information, a designation or identification that adult films are showing, the days and hours
Cited 2 timesPublishedInternational Missions, Inc. v. Lincoln Park
87 N.J. Super. 170 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 1965
Petitioner's appeal to the Morris County Board of Taxation on the ground that its property was exempt under N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6 resulted in an affirmance of the assessment. … Princeton University Press v. Princeton, 35 N.J. 209, 214 (1961).
Cited 13 timesPublishedELDRIDGE HAWKINS, JR. VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2020
The Board further concluded that the ALJ misapplied Richardson v. … Brady v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished218 N.J. Super. 501 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1987
State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 591-592 (1979). Accordingly, the conviction under count three must be reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment of acquittal. … Thus, unlike Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 , 96 S.Ct. 2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); State v. Lyle, 73 N.J. 403 (1977); State v. Deatore, 70 N.J. 100 (1976), and State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished284 N.J. Super. 687 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 7, 1995
v. … Thompson v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMICHAEL J. MONAGHAN VS. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK PLANNING BOARD (L-2175-18. BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 2020
Antonelli v. Waldwick, 79 N.J. Super. 433, 440-41 (App. Div. 1963). We give even greater deference to a planning board's decision to deny a variance in preservation of a zoning plan. Nextel of N.Y., Inc. v. … court's ability to evaluate the basis for the board's decision); CBS Outdoor, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedProperty Owners & Managers Ass'n v. Town Council
264 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 12, 1993
In Wagner v. … Brandon v. Board of Com’rs of Town of Montclair, 124 N.J.L. 135 [ 11 A.2d 304 ] (Sup.Ct.1940), affirmed 125 N.J.L. 367 [ 15 A.2d 598 ] (E. & A.1940).
Cited 0 timesPublished157 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1978
See, e.g., In re Senior Appeals Examiners, 60 N.J. 356 (1972); Monks v. N.J. State Parole Board, 58 N.J. 238 (1971); Reinauer Realty Corp. v. … And see State v. White, supra, 145 N.J.
Cited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna