Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.56s

  • R & R Marketing, L.L.C. v. Jim Beam Brands Co.

    383 N.J. Super. 323 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 23, 2006

    R & R Marketing, L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170,174 , 729 A.2d 1 (1999). … See R & R Marketing, L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 307 N.J.Super. 474 , 704 A.2d 1327 (App.Div.1998), rev’d, 158 N.J. 170 , 729 A.2d 1 (1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • RENAISSANCE BEVERAGES III LLC VS. TOWNSHIP OF LOWER PLANNING BOARD (L-0030-18 AND L-0038-18, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 9, 2020

    "Ordinarily, when a party challenges a zoning board 's decision through an action in lieu of prerogative writs, the zoning board 's decision is entitled to deference." Kane Props., LLC v. … Ten Stary Dom P'ship v. Mauro, 216 N.J. 16, 33 (2013) (citations omitted) (first citing Smart SMR of N.Y., Inc. v. Fair Lawn Bd. of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309, 327 (1998); and then citing Leimann v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In the Matter of Borough of Carteret and Local 67

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 2024

    Orange v. … In the analogous context of decisions issued by Municipal Boards, we have stressed that Board members do not act individually. See Scully-Bozarth Post # 1817 of Veterans of Foreign Wars of U.S. v. Plan.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • A & D Construction, Inc. v. City of Vineland

    175 N.J. Super. 401 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 1980

    Hillside Tp. v. Sternin, supra, 25 N.J. [317] at 325-26 [ 136 A.2d 265 ]; A.C. Schultes & Sons v. Haddon Tp., 8 N.J. 103, 108 , 83 A.2d 896 (1951); Waszen v. … Turco Paving Con., Inc. v. City Council of Orange, 89 N.J.Super. 93, 103 , 213 A.2d 865 (App.Div.1965); Belousofsky v. Board of Education of City of Linden, 54 N.J.Super. 219, 223 , 148 A.2d 632 (App.Div.1957); Case v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • G.S. VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 1, 2021

    A-3347-19 G.S., Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. ____________________ Submitted April 27, 2021 – Decided June 1, 2021. … In re Carter, 191 N.J. 474, 483 (2007) (quoting Greenwood v. State Police Training Ctr., 127 N.J. 500, 513 (1992)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • The CITY NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. OF SALEM v. Hassler

    9 N.J. Super. 153 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 15, 1950

    See Mulholland v. Jones, 83 N.J.L. 604, 606 ( E. & A. 1912); Paul & Hoffman v. Haber, 88 N.J.L. 379 ( E. & A. 1915). … In the course of the bank's brief the assertion is made that the court erred in excluding several questions designed to establish that the cashier's promise was never authorized by resolution of its board of directors or

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Grubbs v. Knoll

    376 N.J. Super. 420 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 2005

    In one instance, the trial court permitted argument on boarding fees for the horses. … result of fraudulent misrepresentations made by the codefendant to both the purchasers and the planning board.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Andreaggi v. Relis

    171 N.J. Super. 203 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 1979

    In respect to Fig. 12, which shows a flush code board, plaintiffs testified that this was conceived at Curtiss-Wright. Such a flush code board is shown in a photograph taken during the Magdop project at Curtiss-Wright. … Inc. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • JL Querner, Etc., Inc. v. Safeway Truck Lines

    65 N.J. Super. 554 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1961

    Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 410 (1960); DeRienzo v. Morristown Airport Corp., 28 N.J. 231, 236 (1958); Honey v. Brown, 22 N.J. 433, 438 (1956); Tua v. Modern Homes, Inc., 64 N.J. … Div. 1950), affirmed 6 N.J. 81 (1950); Brown, Personal Property, 225, 230 (1936). See Gilson v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 86 N.J.L. 446 ( Sup. Ct. 1914), affirmed 87 N.J.L. 690 ( E. & A. 1915).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Pickett

    241 N.J. Super. 259 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 29, 1990

    State v. Reyes, 50 N.J. 454, 458-459 , 236 A. 2d 385 (1967). Accord State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 591 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979). … State v. Jester, supra .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Pellegrino

    254 N.J. Super. 117 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 1992

    The usual Drug Enforcement and Demand Reduction (DEDR) penalty and Violent Crimes Compensation Board (VCCB) penalty were imposed. *119 As a result of the drug distribution conviction, the Bergen County PTI director moved … State v. Devatt, supra, 173 N.J.Super. at 194 , 413 A.2d 973 . This is not a case where there has merely been an arrest or an indictment. See State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Trippiedi

    204 N.J. Super. 422 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 4, 1985

    In State v. … Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees, 77 N.J. 55, 79 (1978); McKenney v. Byrne, 82 N.J. 304, 316-317 (1980).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • A-0850-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TYWAUN S. HEDGESPETH (16-07-2215 AND 16-07-2216, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 3, 2020

    The opinion of the court was delivered by GOODEN BROWN, J.A.D. … The facts in Brown and Phillips are distinguishable from the facts in this case.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Gallagher v. Mayor of Irvington

    184 N.J. Super. 225 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1982

    In Mercadante v. … Clifton v. Passaic Cty. Bd. of Tax., 28 N.J. 411 (1959); Giles v. Gassert, 23 N.J. 22 (1957); State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405 (1956); Garden State Farms, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • White v. MERRILL, LYNCH, ETC.

    90 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 18, 1966

    Irwin v. Williar, 110 U.S. 499 , 4 S.Ct. 160 , 28 L.Ed. 225 (1883). … . *570 "The general rule is that where a customer gives an order to a broker to be executed on a board of trade or exchange, he contemplates conformity to the rules and customs that prevail there ( Wilhite v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State of New Jersey v. William Menter

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 23, 2024

    . __________________________ Submitted October 9, 2024 – Decided October 23, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Chase. … He was also ordered to pay a Violent Crimes Compensation Board ("VCCB") penalty. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal limited to sentencing issues.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Velez

    229 N.J. Super. 305 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1988

    Violent Crimes Compensation Board penalties aggregating $270 were assessed. … See State v. Sainz, supra ( 107 N.J. at 293 ); State v. Roth, 95 N.J. 334 (1984).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Atley

    157 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1978

    See, e.g., In re Senior Appeals Examiners, 60 N.J. 356 (1972); Monks v. N.J. State Parole Board, 58 N.J. 238 (1971); Reinauer Realty Corp. v. … And see State v. White, supra, 145 N.J.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Della Rosa v. Van-Rad Contracting Co.

    267 N.J. Super. 290 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 24, 1993

    He also asserted that he had assisted *293 his foreman, Wright, in moving a pile of 55 to 75 pound boards of sheetrock. … See, e.g., Hodgdon v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stempkowski v. Borough of Manasquan

    208 N.J. Super. 328 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 1986

    See Law v. Newark Bd. of Ed., 175 N.J. Super. 26 (App.Div. 1980) (group of children actively supervised by Board of Education employees). Presence or absence of supervisory personnel alone, however, is not sufficient. … Morris v. Jersey City, 179 N.J. Super. at 464 . No such conduct was suggested in this case. General supervision of the area as urged by plaintiff would not suffice. Sharra v. Atlantic City, supra . Affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.