Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.80s
Vliet v. Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System
156 N.J. Super. 83 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1978
Mayflower Securities Co., Inc. v. Bureau of Securities, 64 N. J. 85, 92-93 (1973); Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N. J. 589, 598-599 (1965). … Weighing equitable factors, the hearing examiner recommended that appellant should not be required to reimburse PEES for prior pension payments received, citing Skulski v. Nolan, 68 N. J. 179 (1975) and Indursky v.
Cited 11 timesPublished444 N.J. Super. 576 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 2016
James v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., 216 N.J. 552, 556 (2014). … We, therefore, affirm the Board's decision.
Cited 21 timesPublishedHoboken for Responsible Cannabis, Inc. v. City of Hoboken Planning Board
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 2024
Thus, we exercise plenary review of a Board's interpretation of the MLUL. See Russo v. … Smart SMR of N.Y., Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Bd. of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309, 327 (1998) (quoting Sica v. Board of Adjustment, 127 N.J. 152, 166-67 (1992)); see also Kane Props., LLC v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPascack Assoc. v. Mayor, Coun. Tp. of Washington
131 N.J. Super. 195 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 1974
In Brown v. Board of Education, supra , the United States Supreme Court declared segregated public school systems unconstitutional. … An illustration of the judicial role in the fashioning of remedies following Brown II may be found in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, supra .
Cited 8 timesPublished110 N.J. Super. 137 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 21, 1970
Stat. p. 1755) seeks to effectuate was described by Vice-Chancellor Backes in Ames v. Board of Education of Montclair, 97 N.J. … Morss v. Forbes, 24 N.J. 341, 358-359 (1957); United States v. Crimmins, 123 F. 2d 271, 272 (2 Cir.1941). In Morss v.
Cited 3 timesPublished80 N.J. Super. 502 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 25, 1963
Debevoise, for defendant Michael V. Albertine ( Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Brown, attorneys). Mr. Walter D. Van Riper, for defendants Ernest S. Arvidson and Frank N. DiRuggiero ( Messrs. … Brown, supra , and Citizens To Protect Public Funds v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedZielenski v. Bd. of Rev., Div. of Emp. SEC.
85 N.J. Super. 46 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 5, 1964
See, too, Flournoy v. Brown, 140 So. 2 d 729 ( La. Ct. App. 1962); Perry v. Brown, 162 So. 2 d 444 ( La. Ct. App. 1964). … Medwick v. Board of Review, 69 N.J. Super. 338, 345 ( App. Div. 1961).
Cited 68 timesPublishedNew Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
307 N.J. Super. 436 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 1997
Defendant Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Metuchen appeals from a judgment entered by the Superior Court, Law Division, reversing its denial of the application of plaintiff New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Company … It therefore reversed the denial and remanded to the Board with directions to approve the application subject to such reasonable conditions as may be imposed upon or agreed to by the applicant and subject to site plan approval
Cited 0 timesPublishedMeyer v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund
49 N.J. Super. 255 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 1958
In State Department of Civil Service v. Clark, 15 N. J. 334, 341 (1954), Mr. … Plaintiff can find no case in point by way of authority for her proposition with the possible exception of Shaw v. Board of Administration, 109 Cal. App. 2d 770, 241 P. 2d 635 (Ct. App. 1952).
Cited 2 timesPublishedImpey v. Board of Education of the Borough of Shrewsbury
273 N.J. Super. 429 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1994
See Simon v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen’s Retirement Sys., 233 N.J.Super. 186, 195 , 558 A.2d 490 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 117 N.J. 652 , 569 A.2d 1348 (1989). … The Board’s decision to contract with an ESC to provide speech correction services is significantly different from the administrative action involved in Viemeister v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBalsley v. North Hunterdon Regional High School Board of Education
225 N.J. Super. 221 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1988
Petitioner Elizabeth Balsley appeals from a final decision of the State Board of Education (State Board) denying her applica *224 tion for counsel fees in connection with her successful petition challenging the refusal of … Concord Co., 54 N.J. 113 (1969) (allowing Division on Civil Rights to award compensatory damages for out-of-pocket losses); Board of Educ., City of Newark, Essex Cty. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPushko v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund
208 N.J. Super. 141 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 1986
Following our decision in this matter, reported at 202 N.J.Super. 98 (App.Div.1985), the Supreme Court filed its opinion in Kane v. … We noted that in Cattani v. Bd. of Trustees, Police & Firemen’s Retire.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDivan Builders, Inc. v. Planning Board of Township of Wayne
127 N.J. Super. 368 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 8, 1974
Cf., Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Princeton Tp., 52 N. J. 348, 350 (1968).
Cited 2 timesPublishedO'Connor v. Board of Commissioners of Town of West Orange
39 N.J. Super. 230 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1956
See O’Neill v. Colonial Memorial Park, Inc., 121 *235 N. J. L. 617 (Sup. Ct. 1939), where the court found that plaintiff was acting as an employee and not a real estate broker. In Griffith v. Daly, 56 N. J. L. 466 (Sup. … Also in Westervelt v. Kunz, 105 N. J. L. 367 (E. & A. 1929), an attorney was allowed to recover because his services were those of an attorney and not a broker. Tn Kagan v. Berman, 14 N.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWaste Disposal, Inc. v. Monmouth County Board of Chosen Freeholders
254 N.J. Super. 205 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 12, 1991
The board of freeholders did not pause to have the technical data analyzed by its experts. No technical data was placed before the board by the supporters of the amendment. … “The Board of Chosen Freeholders considers the reopening of the WDI landfill a serious environmental harm.” The board had no factual proof upon which to reach that conclusion. 6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDobbins v. Board of Education of Henry Hudson Regional High School
133 N.J. Super. 13 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1974
Falcone v. Bd. Education, Newark, 17 N. J. Misc. 75, 4 A. 2d 687 (C. P. 1939) (school girl hurt by a falling partition in washroom); Kane v. Board of Education of Montclair, 20 N. J. Misc. 7, 23 A. 2d 277 (Sup. … The statute therefore bars recovery against the board. However, plaintiffs, citing Titus v. Lindberg, 49 N. J. 66 (1967), assert that the Board was liable for failure to properly supervise the area.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSilverman v. BD. OF ED., TP. OF MILLBURN
134 N.J. Super. 253 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 14, 1975
In Durgin v. Brown, 37 N.J. 189 (1962), the court discussed the effect of a binding referendum on subsequent actions of the school board. … Shuster v. Hardwick Tp. Bd. of Ed., 17 N.J. Super. 357 (App. Div. 1952). The action of the school board to discontinue the use of Washington School is a proper function of the school board.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCity of East Orange v. Essex County Board of Taxation
72 N.J. Super. 179 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 1962
Town of Kearny v. … Town of Kearny v. Div. of Tax Appeals, supra (35 N. J., at p. 314).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKogene Building & Development Corp. v. Edison Township Board of Adjustment
249 N.J. Super. 445 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 1991
Gougeon v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Stone Harbor, 52 N.J. 212, 224 , 245 A.2d 7 (1968). We recognize the presumption of validity accorded the Board’s denial of plaintiff’s variance application. See Kramer v. … Nash v. Board of Adjustment of Township of Morris, supra, 96 N.J. at 107 , 474 A.2d 241 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedRaymond G. Morison, Jr. v. the Willingboro Board of Education
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 2024
In Zayas v. … In City of Springfield v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna