Case law

T.M.S. v. W.C.P.

450 N.J. Super. 499 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 2017

Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. Z.P.R., 351 N.J.Super. 421, 434, 798 A.2d 673 (App. Div. 2002)). The appropriate standard of review for conclusions of law is de novo. S.D. v. … Brown, 394 N.J.Super. 492, 504 , 927 A.2d 569 (App. Div. 2007). Therefore, a double jeopardy defense does not apply to the PDVA. Reversed. In Kanaszka v. Kunen, 313 N.J.Super. 600, 607 , 713 A.2d 565 (App.

Galligan v. Westfield Centre Service, Inc.

166 N.J. Super. 392 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 1979

GALLIGAN, PLAINTIFF, v. … In Kaczmarek, supra at 337-339 , the court applied N.J.S.A. 32:13A-5.4(c), which requires an unfair labor charge to be brought before an administrative board within six months unless there is a showing that the action was

COLONNELLI BROS. v. Ridgefield Park

284 N.J. Super. 538 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 1995

In Carney, Inc. v. City of Trenton, 235 N.J. … See also Public Constructors, Inc. v.

HENRY SMITH VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 2020

A-0369-19T1 HENRY SMITH, Appellant, v. … Trantino v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 166 N.J. 113, 173 (2001) (quoting Beckworth v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 359 (1973)).

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. v. Dalton

234 N.J. Super. 128 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 3, 1989

A further argument made by appellants arises from another regulation of the Board of Medical Examiners, N.J.A.C. 13:35-6.5(b). … In Cantwell v.

Johnson v. Schragger, Lavine, Nagy & Krasny

340 N.J. Super. 84 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 2001

Perez v. … Brown v. United States Stove Co., 98 N.J. 155, 173 , 484 A. 2d 1234 (1984). Consequently, the fact-finder must determine whether the negligence complained of was a substantial factor in bringing about the ultimate harm.

SAL ELECTRIC CO., INC. VS. PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-3244-19, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 25, 2020

Co. v. N.J. Tpk. … See De Vesa v. Dorsey, 134 N.J. 420, 428 (1993); Crescent Park Tenants Ass'n v. Realty Equities Corp. of N.Y., 58 N.J. 98, 108 (1971); see also G.H. v.

McNally v. Middletown Tp.

182 N.J. Super. 622 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 9, 1982

The Monmouth County Board of Social Services determined that petitioners were eligible for relocation and rental assistance payments. … See Rowe v. Pittsgrove Tp., 153 N.J. Super. 274, 280 (Law Div. 1977), rev'd on other grounds 172 N.J. Super. 209 (App.Div. 1980).

MARK AND KATHERINE SMITH VS. SOUTH BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP,PSE&G MARK AND KATHERINE SMITH VS. SOUTH BRUNSWICK PLANNING BOARD(L-906-15 AND L-907-15, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 2017

Fallone Props., L.L.C. v. Bethlehem Twp. Plan. Bd., 369 N.J. Super. 552, 562 (App. Div. 2004). Thus, our review of the Board's action is limited. See Bressman v. … Booth v. Bd. of Adjustment of Rockaway, 50 N.J. 302, 306 (1967). A planning board's discretionary decisions carry a rebuttable presumption of validity. Harvard Enters., Inc. v.

Brotspies v. Department of Civil Service

72 N.J. Super. 334 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 1962

(Brotspies v. Dept. of Civil Service, 66 N. J. … the examinations it gives, as well as the answers the Board considers correct.

Ab v. Div. of Medical Assistance and Health Services

407 N.J. Super. 330 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 2009

Super. 330 A.B., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE & HEALTH SERVICES and Camden County Board of Social Services, Respondents-Respondents. No. A-1855-06T1. … Rhodes & Co. v. Chausovsky, 137 N.J.L. 459, 461 , 60 A. 2d 623 (Sup.Ct.1948); Evans v. Perrine, 35 N.J.L. 221, 223 (Sup.Ct.1871); Citibank, N.A. v.

State v. Edge

111 N.J. Super. 182 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 1970

At one point she said his skin was "very dark" although in her written statement to the police she called it "medium brown skin." Again, the record does not indicate whether the description given fits Robbins. … State v. Hock, 54 N.J. 526 (1969); People v. Kelly, 12 N.Y. 2d 248 , 238 N.Y.S. 2d 934 , 189 N.E. 2d 477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

In Re Seyse

353 N.J. Super. 580 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 2002

State v. Benny, 20 N.J. 238, 251 , 119 A. 2d 155 (1955); Cromwell v. Neeld, 15 N.J.Super. 296, 300 , 83 A. 2d 337 (App.Div.1951); Santeez v. State Farm Ins. … See Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Servs., Inc. v. Leean, 122 F. 3d 443, 449 (7th Cir.1997); Juvelis v. Snider, 68 F. 3d 648 , 655 (3d Cir.1995); Rishell v. Jane Phillips Episcopal Mem. Med.

In re the Commitment & Responsibility for the Care & Maintenance of Taylor

259 N.J. Super. 478 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 29, 1992

AMN Inc. of New Jersey v. South Brunswick Tp. Rent Leveling Board., 93 N.J. 518 , 461 A.2d 1138 (1983). Legislative intent can be ascertained from the nature of the subject matter and the contextual setting. State v.

CHRISTOS DIKTAS VS. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 1, 2021

A-2449-19 CHRISTOS DIKTAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … In addition, Diktas contends PERS' conclusions of law are contrary to Sahli v.

DeCosmo v. Foreman

64 N.J. Super. 516 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 1960

See Cramer v. Weith, 20 N. J. Super. 577, 582 (Ch. … Later, in Board of Education, Woodbridge Twp. v. Kane Acoustical Co., 51 N. J. Super. 319, 329 (App.

THOMAS KRAUS VS. NEW YORK SPORTS CLUB (L-5579-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 2020

Relying on Vitti v. Brown, 359 N.J. Super. 40 (Law Div. 2003), and Murray v. Plainfield Rescue Squad, 418 N.J. Super. 574 (App. … Lee v. Brown, 232 N.J. 114, 126 (2018) (citing Steinberg v. Sahara Sam's Oasis, LLC, 226 N.J. 344, 349-50 (2016)).

State v. Prewitt

127 N.J. Super. 560 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1974

State v. Hopson, 60 N.J. 1 (1971), adopting dissenting opinion reported at 114 N.J. Super. 146 (App. Div. 1971). Hopson overruled State v. Ammirata, 104 N.J. Super. 304 (App. Div. 1969), and that portion of State v. … State v. Sheppard, 125 N.J. Super. 332 (App. Div. 1973).

State of New Jersey v. Jaliyl Amaker

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 2, 2024

A-0628-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JALIYL AMAKER, a/k/a JAMALL BROWN, JALIL BROWN, JAYLIL AMAKER, JALIYL S. AMAKER, JALIVI S. … State v. Nash, 212 N.J. 518, 541 (2013); State v. Preciose, 129 N.J. 451, 459 (1992).

State v. N.G.

381 N.J. Super. 352 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 2005

See State v. … In contrast, parole eligibility for an ADTC sentence is indeterminate; it is left to the discretion of the parole board and special classification review board. Howard, supra, ibid.; N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.51e; N.J.