Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.45s
Lippmann v. Hydro-Space Technology, Inc.
77 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 26, 1962
Rothman v. Harmyl Inn, Inc ., above, at pages 86-87. … Township of Franklin v. Trammell, 80 N.J. Eq. 551 ( E. & A. 1912); Town of Franklin v. Crane, 80 N.J. Eq. 509 ( E. & A. 1912); Fleming v. Fleming, 135 N.J. Eq. 358 ( Ch. 1944)."
Cited 22 timesPublishedTP. OF CEDAR GROVE v. Sheridan
209 N.J. Super. 267 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1986
In Dover, the municipality instituted an action against its Board of Adjustment. … Corp. v. N.J. Casino Control Comm'n., 85 N.J. 325 (1981); Cunningham v. Dept. of Civil Service, 69 N.J. 13 (1975); Kelly v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedErnest Bozzi v. City of Atlantic City
434 N.J. Super. 326 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 2014
Allen v. V & A Bros., Inc., 208 N.J. 114, 127 (2011) (quoting Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc., 197 N.J. 543, 553 (2009)). … Burnett v.
Cited 4 timesPublished200 N.J. Super. 463 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 1985
State v. Sanders, 169 N.J.Super. 596, 601 (Law Div.1979); see also State v. Teitelbaum, 160 N.J.Super. 430 (Law Div.1978); State v. Banks, 157 N.J.Super. 442 (Law Div.1978); State v. … State v. Sayko, 71 N.J. 8, 13 (1976).
Cited 1 timesPublishedKelly v. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS DEVELOP. COM'N
172 N.J. Super. 223 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1980
In short, appellants draw an analogy to an exercise by a local board of adjustment of the variance power. This analogy is inapposite. … As noted in Bow & Arrow Manor v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedIn Re the Summit and Elizabeth Trust Co.
111 N.J. Super. 154 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 14, 1970
Skladzien v. Board of Education of Bayonne, 12 N.J. Misc. 602, 605 , 173 A. 600, 602 (Sup. Ct. 1934), aff'd o.b. 115 N.J.L. 203 (E. & A. 1935). … And see First National Bank *168 in Billings v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 2017
DEC, Defendants-Respondents. __________________________________ HENRY SAMINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTFIELD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and VINCENT K. … Loughlin, respondent pro se and attorney for respondent Westfield Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedGRACE MCMAHON VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 14, 2021
A-3618-18T3 GRACE MCMAHON, Petitioner-Appellant, V. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND,1 Respondent-Respondent. … Those fees included faxing and copying costs and travel expenses for attending the Board meeting. Citing our decision in Sellers v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 399 N.J. Super. 51 (App.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIn re the last will & testament of Geiser
82 N.J. Eq. 311 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1913
Law (4 Dutch.) 516; Baldwin v. Flagg, 43 N. J. Law (14 Vr.) 495. … Gillman v. Gill man, 52 Me. 165 ; Hindman's Appeal, 85 Pa. St. 466.
Cited 10 timesPublished107 N.J. Super. 582 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 1969
Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U.S. 226 , 65 S.Ct. 1092 , 89 L.Ed. 1577 (1945); Lea v. Lea, 18 N.J. 1, 7 (1955); Tonti v. Chadwick, 1 N.J. 531, 535 (1949); cf. Meeker v. Meeker, 52 N.J. 59, 70 (1968). … The Appeals Board determined which claim was meritorious.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDeCarlo v. Borough of Cliffside Park
86 N.J. Super. 169 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1965
In Milstrey v. Hackensack, 6 N. J. 400 (1951), plaintiff was permitted to recover because of a broken and depressed municipal sidewalk; in McAndrew v. Mularchuk, 33 N. … Hart v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Union County, 57 N. J. L. 90 (Sup. Ct. 1894); Milstrey v. Hackensack, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDERICK VEERDEN VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 2021
A-3241-19 DERICK VEERDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … We will sustain a board's decision "unless there is a clear showing that it is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or that it lacks fair support in the record." Russo v. Bd. of Trs., Police and Firemen's Ret.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 2018
Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 448-49 (2012). … Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished131 N.J. Super. 29 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 1974
Place v. Saddle River Bd. of Adj., 42 N.J. 324, 328 (1964); J.D. Const. v. Freehold Tp. Bd. of Adj., 119 N.J. Super. 140, at 145 . … The court, in upholding both the zoning ordinance and this principle of land use restriction said: The regimes of boarding houses, fraternity houses, and the like present urban problems.
Reversed on other grounds by Township of Ewing v. King, 69 N.J. 67 (1976)Cited 1 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 29, 2021
Corp. v. N.J. Casino Control Comm'n, 85 N.J. 325, 338 (1981). See Texter v. Dep't of Hum. … Sloan v. Klagholtz, 342 N.J. Super. 385, 392 (App.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedU.S. Bank Trust National Association, Etc. v. Harinder Singh
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 2026
Caput Mortuum L.L.C. v. S & S Crown Servs., Ltd., 366 N.J. Super. 323, 330 (App. Div. 2004). … Redd v. Bowman, 223 N.J. 87, 104 (2015) (quoting Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Mitchell, 422 N.J. Super. 214, 221-22 (App. Div. 2011)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBRIAN L. TAYLOR VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 2021
TAYLOR, Appellant, v. … Generally, with few exceptions, this court may decline to consider questions or issues not properly raised before the Board. Zaman v. Felton, 219 N.J. 199, 226-27 (2014); Nieder v. Royal Indem. Ins.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSanders v. Division of Motor Vehicles
131 N.J. Super. 95 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1974
Ferguson v. Skrupa, 372 U. S. 726 , 83 S. Ct. 1028 , 10 L. Ed. 2d 93 (1963); Brazee v. Michigan, 241 U. S. 340 , 36 S. Ct. 561 , 60 L. Ed. 1034 (1916) ; see Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U. S. 232 , 77 S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TARIQ THOMPSON (17-07-1891, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 2022
State v. Brown, 216 N.J. 508, 528 (2014). … Brown, 216 N.J. at 532.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJacobs v. North Jersey Blood Center
172 N.J. Super. 159 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 1979
But Collopy v. … Hauser v. Y.M.C.A., 91 N.J.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna