Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

2.47s

  • State v. Council of NJ State College Locals

    141 N.J. Super. 470 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1976

    Mayer v. Ordman, 391 F. 2d 889 (6 Cir.), cert. den. 393 U.S. 925 , 89 S.Ct. 257 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 261 (1968). While Lullo v. Int'l. … NOTES [1] 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 153 (d), 160(b); Tensing v. N.L.R.B. 519 F. 2d 365 (6 Cir.1975); Hernandez v. N.L.R.B., 505 F. 2d 119 (5 Cir.1974); Braden v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Fisher

    408 N.J. Super. 289 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 2009

    See, e.g., Bailes v. Twp. of E. … See Janicky v.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists v. Anthem, Inc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 27, 2025

    A-2324-23 ATLANTIC NEUROSURGICAL SPECIALISTS and ATLANTIC SHORE SURGICAL ASSOCS., P.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ANTHEM, INC., d/b/a ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, f/k/a WELLPOINT, INC., ANTHEM INS. … CLARE'S HOSP., INC., Defendants-Respondents. __________________________________ Submitted May 20, 2025 – Decided May 27, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Smith.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Soliman v. Cepeda

    269 N.J. Super. 151 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 20, 1993

    Attorney General v. … Realty v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • RONALD C. MORGAN VS. WEST CAPE MAY COMBINED ZONING AND PLANNING BOARD (L-0067-20, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 2021

    Thus, our review of the Board's action is limited. Bressman v. … Booth v. Bd. of Adjustment of Rockaway Twp., 50 N.J. 302, 306 (1967). A planning board's discretionary decisions carry a rebuttable presumption of validity. Harvard Enters., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Leonor Alcantara v. Angelica Allen-Mcmillan

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 8, 2025

    Abbott v. … Bay Drywall, LLC v. Dep't of Lab. & Workforce Dev., 251 N.J. 477, 493 (2022) (citing Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC, 220 N.J. 289, 301-02 (2015)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • N. Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF PERSON'L

    389 N.J. Super. 527 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 21, 2006

    Keddie v. Rutgers, State Univ., 148 N.J. 36, 49 , 689 A. 2d 702 (1997). … Red Bank Register, Inc. v. Bd. of Educ. of Long Branch, 206 N.J.Super. 1, 9 , 501 A. 2d 985 (App.Div.1985); See also Home News v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • DCPP VS. A.C. AND A.W.C., SR. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF A.W.C., JR. (FG-13-0050-17, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 2018

    Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. F.M., 211 N.J. 420, 448-49 (2012). … Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cipriano v. Department of Civil Service

    151 N.J. Super. 86 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1977

    Dodd v. Van Riper, 135 N.J.L. 167, 171 (E. & A. 1947); Briggs v. Civil Service Dept., 64 N.J. Super. 351, 355-356 (App. Div. 1960); Devine v. Plainfield, 31 N.J. Super. 300, 303 (App. Div. 1954). … Belmar, 14 N.J. 195, 205 (1954); Zimmerman v. Board of Review, 132 N.J. Super. 316, 324 (App. Div. 1975). As the court said in Keenan v. Essex Cty. Freeholders Bd., 106 N.J. Super. 312, 316 (App.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • CPC Intern., Inc. v. HARTFORD ACC.

    316 N.J. Super. 351 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1998

    In its report, the Board related that "residue and waste from the barrels were seeping into tributaries" of the stream. … The Board indicated that the drums "ha[d] been buried in a make-shift landfill" prohibited by Township ordinance. On July 1, 1974, Penick wrote to the Board acknowledging the problem and promising to correct it.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • TYREESE EVANS VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 2021

    Our review of a Board's decision is limited. Hare v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 368 N.J. Super. 175, 179 (App. Div. 2004). … "Drawing on the diverse backgrounds of its members, the Parole Board makes 'highly predictive and individualized discretionary appraisals.'" Acoli v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 224 N.J. 213, 222 (quoting Beckworth v. N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Millburn Tp. v. BLOCK 1208, LOT 2

    189 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 1983

    Loboda v. Clark Tp., 40 N.J. 424 (1963); Giles v. Gassert, 23 N.J. 22 (1957); Pfitzinger v. Public Emp. Retirement System *528 Trustees, 62 N.J. Super. 589 (Law Div. 1960); Bogda v. … Rates of taxation are fixed annually by the county boards of taxation for local school and county purposes. N.J.S.A. 54:4-39 to 42; N.J.S.A. 54:4-48 and 49; N.J.S.A. 54:4-55.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TARIQ THOMPSON (17-07-1891, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 2022

    State v. Brown, 216 N.J. 508, 528 (2014). … Brown, 216 N.J. at 532.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • DERICK VEERDEN VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 2021

    A-3241-19 DERICK VEERDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … We will sustain a board's decision "unless there is a clear showing that it is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or that it lacks fair support in the record." Russo v. Bd. of Trs., Police and Firemen's Ret.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • SAL ELECTRIC CO., INC. VS. PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-3244-19, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 25, 2020

    Co. v. N.J. Tpk. … See De Vesa v. Dorsey, 134 N.J. 420, 428 (1993); Crescent Park Tenants Ass'n v. Realty Equities Corp. of N.Y., 58 N.J. 98, 108 (1971); see also G.H. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • MICHAEL BRUNETTI VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 13, 2021

    (quoting Charatan v. Bd. of Rev., 200 N.J. Super. 74, 79 (App. Div. 1985)). "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, [we] are obliged to accept them.'" Ibid. (quoting Self v. … Yardville Supply Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • SHORE GAS AND OIL CO., INC. v. Spring Lake Bor.

    27 N.J. Super. 33 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 28, 1953

    As said in Tice v. Long Branch, supra, and iterated in Rankin v. Board of Education of Egg Harbor Twp., supra, `The rule is one which is rooted deep in sound principles in public policy of general application. … Armitage v. Newark, 86 N.J.L. 5 ( Sup. Ct. 1914); Paterson Contracting Co. v. Hackensack, 99 Id. 260 ( E. & A. 1923); American Water Corp. v. Florham Park, 5 N.J. Misc. 969 ( Sup. Ct. 1927); Schwartz and Nagle, etc., v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Slotnick v. Club ABC Tours, Inc.

    430 N.J. Super. 59 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 9, 2012

    Prior to hiring T3, STI asserts it used due diligence in its selection by obtaining positive recommendations from other tour companies, by meeting with the Jordanian tourist board, and by reading reviews from the board regarding … In Loeb v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Centex Homes Corp. v. Boag

    128 N.J. Super. 385 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 1974

    v. … Eq. 427 (Ch. 1900); Moore v. Baker, 62 N.J. Eq. 208 (Ch. 1901); Van Riper v. Wickersham, 77 N.J. Eq. 232 (Ch. 1910); Gerba v. Mitruske, 84 N.J. Eq. 79 (Ch. 1914); Meyer v. Reed, 91 N.J. Eq. 237 (Ch. 1920); Morris v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Lou Menges Organization v. North Jersey Quarry Co.

    3 N.J. Super. 494 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1949

    Newark Aqueduct Board v. Passaic, 45 N.J. Eq. 393 , 402 , 18 A. 106 ; Hemsley v. Bew, 53 N.J. Eq. 241 , 31 A. 210 ; Vaszil v. Molnar, 133 N.J. Eq. 577 , 33 A.2d 743 . … Recent adjudications of instructive pertinency and replete with citations are: Benton v. Kernan, 127 N.J. Eq. 434 , 13 A.2d 825 ( Ch. ); decree modified, 130 N.J. Eq. 193 , 21 A.2d 755 ; Kosich v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.