Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.54s

  • JAHLI MILES VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 14, 2020

    A-0261-19T3 JAHLI MILES, Appellant, v. … Our scope of review of Parole Board determinations is highly circumscribed, and "grounded in strong public policy concerns and practical realities." Trantino v. N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Adams v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.

    36 N.J. Super. 53 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 1955

    Bennett, Billings, Edwin Brown, L.W. … Duff v. Trenton Beverage Co., 4 N.J. 595 (1950).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • LOUIS PEPE VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. CHRISTOPER BARRELLA VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. JAMES BOYLE VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. RICHARD BIZZARI VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM) (CONSOLIDATED)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 22, 2021

    BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ JAMES BOYLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ RICHARD BIZZARI, Petitioner-Appellant, v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sharra v. City of Atlantic City

    199 N.J. Super. 535 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 22, 1985

    See Rodriguez v. N.J. Sports & *541 Exposition Authority, 193 N.J. Super. 39 (App.Div. 1983) (attack by persons in sports complex not a dangerous condition); Cogsville v. Trenton, 159 N.J. … See Cogsville v. Trenton, *542 supra (no liability for failure to remove a vicious dog from city-owned property); Cadmus v. Long Branch Board of Education, 155 N.J.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. v. Dalton

    234 N.J. Super. 128 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 3, 1989

    A further argument made by appellants arises from another regulation of the Board of Medical Examiners, N.J.A.C. 13:35-6.5(b). … In Cantwell v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Calloway v. Wildwood Crest

    70 N.J. Super. 601 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 1, 1961

    Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Bd. of Taxation, supra; State ( Keeler, Prosecutor ) v. Tindell, 36 N.J.L. 97 ( Sup. Ct. 1872). … Aldom v. Borough of Roseland, 42 N.J. Super. 495 ( App. Div. 1956).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • S.M. v. Department of Human Services

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 2026

    A-2773-23 S.M.,1 Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Flagg v. Essex Cnty. Prosecutor, 171 N.J. 561, 571 (2002) (quoting Achacoso-Sanchez v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 779 F.2d 1260, 1265 (7th Cir. 1985)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • K.H. VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2021

    A-3110-18 K.H., Appellant, v. … Howard v. Bd. of Rev., 173 N.J. Super. 196, 202 (App. Div. 1980); see also Bannan v. Bd. of Rev., 299 N.J. Super. 671, 674 (App. Div. 1997) (citing Fischer v. Bd. of Rev., 123 N.J. Super. 263, 266 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kram v. Kram

    98 N.J. Super. 274 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1967

    Johnson v. Muelberger, 340 U.S. 581, 584 , 71 S.Ct. 474 , 95 L.Ed. 552 (1951); Morris v. Jones, 329 U.S. 545 , 67 S.Ct. 451 , 91 L.Ed. 488 , 168 A.L.R. 656 (1947); Roche v. … proceeding, the husband had instituted a suit for divorce in New Hampshire on the grounds of extreme cruelty and desertion and the New Hampshire court had denied him this relief and had granted her a divorce from bed and board

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lanzaro

    271 N.J. Super. 425 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 1992

    Salomon v. Jersey City, 12 N.J. 379, 384 , 97 A.2d 405 , (1953); Bellington v. Township of East Windsor, 17 N.J. 558, 565 , 112 A.2d 268 , (1955); Daniels v. Point Pleasant, 23 N.J. 357 , 129 A.2d 265 (1957); Moyant v. … Virtue v. Board of Freeholders of Essex County, 67 N.J.L. 139 , 50 A. 360 (Sup.Ct.1901). As an examination of the general index to the New Jersey statutes reveals, those powers and duties are many.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Goffe v. Foulke Mgmt. Corp.

    454 N.J. Super. 260 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 24, 2018

    . *265 I Soon after the filing of these two actions- Robinson v. Mall Chevrolet and Goffe v. … See, e.g. , Morgan v. Sanford Brown Inst. , 225 N.J. 289 , 307-09, 137 A.3d 1168 (2016) ; NAACP of Camden Cty. E. v. Foulke Mgmt. Corp. , 421 N.J. Super. 404 , 428, 24 A.3d 777 (App. Div. 2011) ; Rockel v.

    Reversed by Janell Goffe v. Foulke Management Corp Sasha Robinson and Tijuana Johnson v. Mall Chevrolet (081258) (Camden County and Statewide), 238 N.J. 191 (2019)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Karaarslan

    262 N.J. Super. 123 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 6, 1993

    Robertson, for the Board of Chosen Freeholders of Somerset County IMBRIANI, P.J.Cr. State v. Kounelis, 258 N.J. Super. 420 , 609 A. 2d 1310 (App. … State v. Vasquez, 129 N.J. 189, 201 , 609 A. 2d 29 (1992). It has not done so here and we will not infer that is what it intended.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Determination of Executive Commission on Ethical Standards

    222 N.J. Super. 482 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1988

    See also Rutgers v. … Indeed, Greenberg v.

    Reversed on other grounds by In Re Determination of Executive Commission on Ethical Standards, 116 N.J. 216 (1989)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brotspies v. Department of Civil Service

    72 N.J. Super. 334 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 1962

    (Brotspies v. Dept. of Civil Service, 66 N. J. … the examinations it gives, as well as the answers the Board considers correct.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Toland v. Atlantic Gahagan Joint Venture Dredge No. 1

    109 N.J. Super. 186 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 6, 1970

    In Hansen v. … In Biggs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Peter Aulert v. Mayor and Township Committee of Brick, New Jersey

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 4, 2025

    Plaintiffs cite to Szoke v. … Plaintiffs challenged the Board's determination, arguing the participation of a disqualified member of the zoning board required vacatur of the zoning board's action. Ibid.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lindenmuth v. Alperin

    197 N.J. Super. 385 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 1984

    Board of Regents (1976) 55 Cal. App. 3d 573 , 127 Cal. Rptr. 720 ], nor could he otherwise sense it as in Archibald [ v. Braverman (1969) 275 Cal. App. 2d 253 , 79 Cal. Rptr. 723 ] or Krouse [ v. … See Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.

    210 N.J. Super. 315 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1986

    We are aware of the fact that on May 12, 1982 Jersey City authorized its planning board to prepare a blight study of the Roosevelt Stadium area. … Gladden v. Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System, 171 N.J. Super. 363, 370-371 (App.Div. 1979). Nor was there a waiver.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Sanner v. Government Employees Ins. Co.

    150 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1977

    Morris Brown, of counsel; Mr. Alan Wasserman on the brief). PER CURIAM. … See also, United States v. St. Paul Mercury Indem. Co., 238 F. 2d 594 (8 Cir.1956); Irby v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 175 So. 2d 9 (La. App. 1965); Gordon v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Margaret Pike v. Raffaele Corbisiero, M.D.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 20, 2024

    Estate of Pfannenstein v. Surrey, 475 N.J. Super. 83 (App. Div. 2023), certif. … We addressed the plaintiff's reliance on language from the Supreme Court in Buck v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.