Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • Florence Methodist Church v. Township Committee

    38 N.J. Super. 85 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1955

    See Wilson v. Board of Com’rs of Jersey City, 94 N. J. L. 119, 122 (E. & A. 1920); Miner v. Larney, 87 N. J. L. 40, 41 (Sup. Ct. 1915); cf. *91 Handlon v. Town of Belleville, 4 N. J. 99, 105 (1950). Mrs. … Mazza v. Cavicchia, 15 N. J. 498 (1954).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • MATTHEW DAVIS VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 20, 2021

    The Board stated that, under Gerba v. … Davis argues, however, that the Board's decision is inconsistent with our decision in Petrucelli v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees' Retirement System, 211 N.J. Super. 280 (App. Div. 1986).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • IN RE: THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED IMPROPER PRACTICE UNDER SECTION XI, PARAGRAPH A(d) OF THE PORT AUTHORITY LABOR INSTRUCTION, ETC. (L-2723-18, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 2020

    See Brown v. Port Auth. Police Superior Officers Ass'n, 283 N.J. Super. 122, 136 (App. Div. 1995). … Manalapan Realty, L.P., 140 N.J. at 378 (citing State v. Brown, 118 N.J. 545, 604 (1990)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Roskein v. Roskein

    25 N.J. Super. 415 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 1953

    Sherrer v. Sherrer and Coe v. Coe , above. … The first five items in this group — shoes $26.90, medicine $14, wearing apparel $419.76, board while Joan was home from Smith College for the summer of 1950, $400, and board for Joan during November 1949 and April 1950 when

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Krieger v. City of Jersey City

    48 N.J. Super. 280 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1958

    Eckelmann, Inc., v. Jones, 4 N. J. 314, 319 (1950); Morin v. Becker, 6 N. J. 451, 460 (1951). … Shockley v. Hamilton Township, supra, 98 N. J. L. at page 616; cf. Murphy v. Freeholders of Hudson County, supra, 92 N. J. L. at page 247; Villani v. Duffy, 114 N. J. L. 60 (Sup. Ct. 1934); Levinson v. Mooney, 128 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carey v. Carey

    36 N.J. Super. 23 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1955

    Hence, she must prove that her husband’s conduct was such extreme cruelty as would allow her to institute an action for divorce from bed and board. Zehrer v. Zehrer, 5 N. … Weigel v. Weigel, 63 N. J. Eq. 677 (Ch. 1902); McKee v. McKee, 107 N. J. Eq. 1 (Ch. 1930).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MICHAEL D. KIEFFER, ETC. VS. CHARLES A. BUDD(C-0006-12, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 24, 2017

    That same day, DPI, Budd, and plaintiff executed a stock restriction agreement, and DPI's Board of Directors (Board) issued a resolution electing plaintiff to the Board and appointing him DPI's vice-president effective … (quoting Cesare v. Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 411- 12 (1998)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lisa R. Worthy v. Kennedy Health System

    446 N.J. Super. 71 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 2016

    BROWN, R.N., and JOAN MAZZARELLA, R.N., Defendants, and JOSEPH P. … Brown v. Kennedy Mem'l Hosp.-Univ. Med. Ctr., 312 N.J. Super. 579, 587 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 426 (1998).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • J.G. VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 3, 2021

    A-1197-19 J.G.,1 Petitioner-Appellant, v. … In Patterson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In Re Seyse

    353 N.J. Super. 580 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 2002

    State v. Benny, 20 N.J. 238, 251 , 119 A. 2d 155 (1955); Cromwell v. Neeld, 15 N.J.Super. 296, 300 , 83 A. 2d 337 (App.Div.1951); Santeez v. State Farm Ins. … See Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Servs., Inc. v. Leean, 122 F. 3d 443, 449 (7th Cir.1997); Juvelis v. Snider, 68 F. 3d 648 , 655 (3d Cir.1995); Rishell v. Jane Phillips Episcopal Mem. Med.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Township of Cinnaminson

    71 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 18, 1961

    In the case of State v. Murphy, 36 N. … See Doremus v. Board of Education of Borough of Hawthorne, 5 N. J. 435 (1950).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • MAYOR, ETC., ELIZABETH v. NJ Turnpike Authority

    7 N.J. Super. 540 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 24, 1950

    Super. 540 (1950) 72 A.2d 399 THE MAYOR, THE CITY COUNCIL, THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, AND THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS, v. … Eq. 550 ( Ch. 1922); State Highway Commission v. Elizabeth, supra; New Jersey Good Humor, Inc., v. Bradley Beach, 124 N.J.L. 162 ( E. & A. 1939); Jersey City v. Martin, 126 N.J.L. 353 ( E. & A. 1941).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In re Rules Adoption Regarding Inmate Mail to Attorneys

    232 N.J. Super. 478 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1989

    In Procunier v. … Mann v. Adams, 846 F.2d 589 (9th Cir.1988); Guajardo v. Estelle, 580 F.2d 748 (5th Cir.1978); Taylor v. Sterrett, 532 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1976); Travis v. Lockhart, 607 F.Supp. 1083 (D.C.Ark.1985); Burton v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. McCormack Terminal, Inc.

    191 N.J. Super. 48 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 29, 1983

    State v. Hatco Chemical Co., 96 N.J.Super. 238, 240-242 , (App.Div.1967); Studerus Oil Co., Inc. v. Jersey City, 128 N.J.L. 286, 292 (Sup.Ct.1942); Pfister Chemical Co., Inc. v. … See Board of Health of Weehawken Tp. v. N.Y. Central R. Co., 4 N.J. 293, 302 (1950). The statute reads: 40:49-5.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Morey v. Borough of Wildwood Crest

    18 N.J. Tax 335 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 8, 1999

    TMC Properties v. Wharton Borough, 15 N.J.Tax 155 , 463 (Tax 1996); Hastings Plaza v. Washington Tp., 17 N.J.Tax 165, 169 (Tax 1998). … Cassini v. City of *341 Orange, supra, 16 N.J.Tax at 438.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • MICHELE GONZALEZ VS. ANTHONY ODUNLAMI (L-4343-18, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 23, 2021

    A-3212-19 MICHELE GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … (citing Nash v. Bd. of Adjustment of Morris Twp., 96 N.J. 97, 102 (1984)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lohmann v. Lohmann

    50 N.J. Super. 37 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 28, 1958

    In Hardman v. Brown, 77 W. Va. 478 , 88 S.E. 1016, 1019 ( Sup. Ct. … Sailer v. Sailer, 41 N.J. Eq. 398 ( Ch. 1886); Barrell v. Barrell, 25 N.J. Eq. 173 ( Ch. 1874); Brown v. Havens, supra .

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Lloyd v. Stone Harbor

    179 N.J. Super. 496 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1981

    [at 432-433, 95 S.Ct. at 1695 ] To the same effect are: McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 671 , 83 S.Ct. 1433, 1435 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 622 (1963); Damico v. … Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 440 (1980); Johnson v. Rwy. Express Agency, 421 U.S. 454, 462 , 95 S.Ct. 1716, 1721 , 44 L.Ed. 2d 295 (1978); Polite v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 (1988)Cited 33 timesPublished
  • State v. Smith

    190 N.J. Super. 21 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 1982

    He would be released on parole only on the recommendation of the special classification review board when it found that he could adjust to the community. N.J.S.A. 2A:164-8. … See State v. Clark, 54 N.J. 25, 26 (1969); State v. Rydzewski, 112 N.J. Super. 517, 520-521 (App.Div. 1970); R. 2:2-3(a)(2); N.J.A.C. 10A:31-3.6, 3.8.

    Disagreed with by Gerald v. Com'r, New Jersey Dept. of Corrections, 201 N.J. Super. 438 (1985)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Blackner v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

    311 N.J. Super. 10 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 24, 1998

    By its enactment, Congress abandoned the approach embodied in the Federal Aviation Act of 1958(FAA), which had empowered the Civil Aeronautics Board to regulate the interstate airline industry. … The Supreme Court next dealt with § 1305(a)(1) in American Airlines, Inc. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.