Case law

Gavett v. Hoboken

47 N.J. Super. 596 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 27, 1957

The decisions that sustain the view I have expressed are Frank Grad & Sons, Inc. v. City of Newark, 118 N.J.L. 376 ( E. & A. 1937); Murphy v. Town of West New York, 132 N.J.L. 595 ( Sup. Ct. 1945); Samuel v. … . & A. 1947); Bauer v. City of Newark, 7 N.J. 426 ( Sup. Ct. 1951). Cases in other jurisdictions are in accord. See DeKam v. Streator, *600 316 Ill. 123 , 146 N.E. 550 ( Sup. Ct. 1925); Gutta-Percha & Rubber Mfg. Co. v.

DAVIN, LLC v. Daham

329 N.J. Super. 54 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 6, 2000

The November 23, 1993 letter agreement was presented to the Board of Directors of Valley National for its consideration. On November 29, 1993, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the transaction. … Co. v.

New Jersey Highway Authority v. Sills

109 N.J. Super. 424 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 25, 1970

In New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. … New Jersey Bankers Ass'n v. Van Riper, 1 N.J. 193 (1948).

Joseph E. Devaney, Jr.vs. the Chemours Company Fc, LLC

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 2, 2024

Lee v. Brown, 232 N.J. 114, 126-27 (2018). "[S]ummary judgment will be granted if there is no genuine issue of material fact and 'the moving party is entitled to a judgment or order as a matter of law.'" Conley v. … Townsend v. Pierre, 221 N.J. 36, 51 (2015) (quoting Polzo v. Cnty. of Essex, 196 N.J. 569, 584 (2008)).

Consolidated Rail Corporation v. City Council of the City of Jersey City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 2025

Jock v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 184 N.J. 562, 597 (2005). … As a reviewing court, we are not to substitute our judgment for that of the local board unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. Cell S. of N.J., Inc. v.

Laurino Co., Inc. v. Daly Building Corp.

21 N.J. Super. 556 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 1952

Marten v. Brown, 81 N.J.L. 599 ( E. & A. 1911). However, it is apparent on the face of the questions that there is no merit to the appellant's contention. … Quellmalz v. Atlantic Coast Elect. Ry. Co., 94 N.J.L. 474 ( E. & A. 1920); State v. Snover, 101 N.J.L. 543 ( E. & A. 1925); Semento v. Recca, 3 N.J. Misc. 1210 ( Sup. Ct. 1925); Kiernan v. Mauer, 13 N.J.

State v. Rosen

52 N.J. Super. 210 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1958

In the case of United States v. … Board of Health, Borough of Hillsdale v. Tandy & Allen, Inc., 29 N.J. Super. 61 ( Cty. Ct. 1953). In our case defendant admits he was a fugitive from justice and there is no need to determine this question of fact.

WILLIAM NORIEGA VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 2021

A-2236-19 WILLIAM NORIEGA, Appellant, v. … Brady v. Bd. of Rev., 152 N.J. 197, 210 (1997). "If the Board's factual findings are supported 'by sufficient credible evidence, courts are obliged to accept them.'" Ibid. (quoting Self v.

Kligman v. Wilfred Company of Newark, Inc.

91 N.J. Super. 591 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1966

Div. 1959); Board of Education, Woodbridge Tp. v. Kane Acoustical Co., 51 N. J. Super. 319 (App. Div. 1958). The reason for this must be fairly obvious. … Compare Wall v. Gill, 311 Ky. 796 , 225 S. W. 2d 670 , 14 A. L. R. 2d 857 (Ct. App. 1949), with Massa v. Wanamaker Academy of Beauty Culture, Inc., 80 N. Y. S. 2d 923 (N. Y. City Ct. 1948). Cf. Miller v.

CPC Intern., Inc. v. HARTFORD ACC.

316 N.J. Super. 351 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1998

In its report, the Board related that "residue and waste from the barrels were seeping into tributaries" of the stream. … The Board indicated that the drums "ha[d] been buried in a make-shift landfill" prohibited by Township ordinance. On July 1, 1974, Penick wrote to the Board acknowledging the problem and promising to correct it.

Atwood v. TRUSTEES, FIRST PRES. CHURCH, CALDWELL

26 N.J. Super. 607 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1953

ATWOOD, JR., PLAINTIFFS, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CALDWELL, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division. Decided June 26, 1953. Messrs. … Latham v. Johnson, 1 K.B. 398 (1913); Southcote v. Stanley, 1 Hurst & N. 247; 156 Eng. Repr. 1195; 25 L.J. Exch. ( N.S. ) 339. Such distinction is also noted in our cases. Morril v. Morril, supra ; Lewis v.

Krieger v. City of Jersey City

48 N.J. Super. 280 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1958

Eckelmann, Inc., v. Jones, 4 N. J. 314, 319 (1950); Morin v. Becker, 6 N. J. 451, 460 (1951). … Shockley v. Hamilton Township, supra, 98 N. J. L. at page 616; cf. Murphy v. Freeholders of Hudson County, supra, 92 N. J. L. at page 247; Villani v. Duffy, 114 N. J. L. 60 (Sup. Ct. 1934); Levinson v. Mooney, 128 N. J.

Carey v. Carey

36 N.J. Super. 23 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1955

Hence, she must prove that her husband’s conduct was such extreme cruelty as would allow her to institute an action for divorce from bed and board. Zehrer v. Zehrer, 5 N. … Weigel v. Weigel, 63 N. J. Eq. 677 (Ch. 1902); McKee v. McKee, 107 N. J. Eq. 1 (Ch. 1930).

State v. Lentini

240 N.J. Super. 330 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1990

Builders, Owners and Managers Association v. Blair, 60 N.J. 330, 338 , 288 A. 2d 855 (1972).] See also Wollen v. … State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415 [ 126 A. 2d 161 ] (1956). [ 107 N.J. at 510-511 , 527 A. 2d 388 .]

Inganamort v. Borough of Fort Lee

131 N.J. Super. 558 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 18, 1974

is a consolidation of six separate actions instituted by numerous owners of multi-family residences seeking to invalidate Fort Lee Rent Levelling Ordinance 74-26 and to overturn the actions of the Fort Lee Rent Levelling Board … Issues concerning actions of the Rent Levelling Board affecting leases during that one year period are not disposed of by this decision.

Shaw v. MAYOR AND TWP. COMM. OF WAYNE

65 N.J. Super. 461 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 1961

Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545 (1949). Plaintiff contrasts DeManaco v. … Co. v. Board of Review , above, 1 N.J., at page 557 .

Orgo Farms & Greenhouses v. Colts Neck Tp.

192 N.J. Super. 599 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 1983

BRUNELLI, PLAINTIFFS, v. TOWNSHIP OF COLTS NECK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; AND ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF TOWNSHIP OF COLTS NECK, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Monmouth County. … Blair for defendant Zoning Board of Adjustment. SERPENTELLI, J.S.C.

Silagy v. STATE OF NJ AND COUNTY OF MERCER

101 N.J. Super. 455 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 1968

See Board of Com'rs of Eagle County v. Evans, 99 Colo. 83 , 60 P. 2 d 225 ( Sup. Ct. 1936); Seward v. County of Bernalillo, 61 N.M. 52 , 294 P. 2 d 625 ( Sup. Ct. 1956); Jochen v. … Ct. 1961), and Hicks v. Guilford County, 267 N.C. 364 , 148 S.E. 2 d 240 ( Sup. Ct. 1966). In Board of Com'rs of Eagle County v.

Williams v. Township of Cinnaminson

71 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 18, 1961

In the case of State v. Murphy, 36 N. … See Doremus v. Board of Education of Borough of Hawthorne, 5 N. J. 435 (1950).

Constanza v. Verona

48 N.J. Super. 355 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 10, 1958

In Hunterdon Freeholders v. Henry, 41 N. J. … These two eases concern the same trust: Reilly v. State, 119 Conn. 508 , 177 A. 528 (Sup. Ct. Err. 1935), and City of Bridgeport v. Reilly, 133 Conn. 31 , 47 A. 2d 865 (Sup. Ct. Err. 1946).