Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.82s

  • Belmar v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage Control

    50 N.J. Super. 423 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 21, 1958

    Super. 423 (1958) 142 A.2d 653 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE BOROUGH OF BELMAR, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT, v. … Hickey v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 31 N.J. Super. 114 ( App. Div. 1954); Rajah Liquors v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 33 N.J. Super. 598 ( App. Div. 1955), certif. den. 18 N.J. 204 (1955).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of James MacCarthy

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 2026

    PER CURIAM James MacCarthy is a classroom teacher employed by the Eastampton Township Board of Education (the Board). … See Kaczmarek v. N.J. Tpk.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Boileau v. De Cecco

    125 N.J. Super. 263 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1973

    O'Connell v. Forest Hill Field Club, 119 N.J. Super. 317 (Law Div. 1972), and Scheck v. Houdaille Const. Materials, Inc., 121 N.J. Super. 335 (Law Div. 1972). … Board of Education, Union Beach v. N.J.E.A., 53 N.J. 29, 46 (1968); DeFazio v. Haven S. & L. Ass'n, 22 N.J. 511, 519 (1956); Foy v. Dayko, 82 N.J. Super. 8 (1964).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Corvelli v. Fonseca

    323 N.J. Super. 342 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1999

    Plaintiff urges that the court apply the formula set forth in Levin v. Woodbine Borough Council, 181 N.J.Super. 61 , 436 A.2d 564 (Law Div.1981). … It must be noted that a number of actions coming before this court seeking relief against governing bodies and boards of municipalities name the individual members of such governing bodies and boards as parties defendant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MARVIN ESCOBAR-BARRERA VS. PAUL KISSIN (L-0783-17. UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2020

    The opinion of the court was delivered by GOODEN BROWN, J.A.D. … Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Bethea

    243 N.J. Super. 280 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 1990

    We adhere to State v. … It may be true that the federal cases cited in Ogar did not examine the 1988 amendments to 21 U.S.C. § 845a(a), as did United States v. Roberts, 735 F.Supp. 537 (S.D.N.Y.1990), and United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Amico/Tunnel Carwash

    371 N.J. Super. 199 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 2004

    Texter v. Dept. of Human Servs., 88 N.J. 376, 384-85 , 443 A. 2d 178 (1982); see also High Horizons Dev. Co. v. … In Spalt v. New Jersey Dep't of Envtl.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Municipal Sanitary Landfill Authority v. Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission

    120 N.J. Super. 118 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 24, 1972

    A. 13:1D-1 et seq. and to the Board of Public Utilities (PUC), pursuant to N. J. S. A. 48:13A-4 and 6. … Asbury Park Press, Inc. v. Woolley, 33 N. J. 1, 12 (1960). Further, in N. J. Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCrane, 119 N. J. Super. 457 (Law Div.), aff’d 61 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hoover v. EAST BRUNSWICK TP. COMM.

    69 N.J. Super. 211 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 18, 1961

    This case would appear to be the leading one in this area and was cited as controlling in Napierkowski v. Gloucester Tp., 29 N.J. 481 (1959), and DeNike v. Board of Trustees of the Public ( State ) Employees' Ret. … Dacunzo v. Edgye, 19 N.J. 443 (1955). This rule of construction should not be applied with such rigidity as to defeat the "obvious purpose of the legislature," Ross v. Miller, 115 N.J.L. 61 ( Sup.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Anthony King v. Barnegat Township

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 2025

    Samolyk v. Berthe, 251 N.J. 73, 78 (2022). … Friedman v. Martinez, 242 N.J. 449, 472 (2020) (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Atkinson v. Pittsgrove Tp.

    193 N.J. Super. 23 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1983

    Super. 23 (1983) 471 A.2d 1215 CHARLES NEWELL ATKINSON, PLAINTIFF, v. PITTSGROVE TOWNSHIP, SALEM COUNTY; SALEM COUNTY TAX BOARD; AND THE H.D. MARTIN COMPANY OF MILLVILLE A/K/A NATHANIEL ROGOVOY, DEFENDANT. … Scoggin v. Schrunk, 522 F.2d 436, 437 (9th Cir. 1975).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re County of Mercer

    172 N.J. Super. 406 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1980

    The county argues that it was the intent of the Legislature in adopting the Charter Law to vest centralized control of county government in a chief executive and an elected board of chosen freeholders. … Brewer v. Porch, 53 N.J. 167, 174 (1969).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Crego v. Carp

    295 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1996

    Carp, a board certified family practitioner, examined and x-rayed plaintiff's leg. … Board of Educ. of Asbury Park v. Hoek, 38 N.J. 213, 228 , 183 A. 2d 633 (1962). *574 It also is firmly settled in this State that "[t]he science of medicine is not an exact science." Clark v. Wichman, 72 N.J.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • State v. Carlson

    344 N.J. Super. 521 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 2001

    IV, Sec. 215-13, which appellant believes proscribes the boarding of horses as a commercial use or "commercial enterprise" in a five acre zone. They were each fined $50 and ordered to pay $25 in court costs. … State v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 171 , 733 A. 2d 1159 (1999); State v. Barnes, supra, 84 N.J. at 365 , 420 A. 2d 303 ; State v. Yaccarino, 3 N.J. 291, 295 , 70 A. 2d 84 (1949); State v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Melissa Schwartz v. Michael Kopelman, Esq.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 2026

    In 243 South Harrison Street Corp. v. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Save Old York v. the Township of Chesterfield

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 2024

    Samolyk v. Berthe, 251 N.J. 73, 78 (2022). … Friedman v. Martinez, 242 N.J. 449, 472 (2020) (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986)). We do not defer to the trial court's legal analysis. RSI Bank v. Providence Mut. Fire Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Davis

    91 N.J. Super. 470 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 1966

    State v. Stephan, 118 N.J.L. 592, 600-602 ( E. & A. 1937); Commonwealth v. Goetz, 129 Pa. Super. 22 , 195 A. 144 ( Super Ct. 1937); Beeland v. State, 149 Tex. Cr. R. 272 , 193 S.W. 2 d 687 ( Ct. Crim. App. 1946). … People v. Coffey, 11 N.Y. 2 d 142, 227 N.Y.S. 2 d 412, 182 N.E. 2 d 92 ( Ct. App. 1962); People v. Jennings, 23 A.D. 2 d 621, 257 N.Y.S. 2 d 456 ( App. Div. 1965); Commonwealth v. Goetz, supra ; Commonwealth v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harrison v. Township of Long Beach

    21 N.J. Super. 605 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 9, 1952

    Miller v. … In Vanderhoven v. Rahway, 120 N.J.L. 610 ( Sup.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • D'AGATA v. Larson

    32 N.J. Super. 323 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 8, 1954

    Brown argued the cause for defendant-respondent. The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D. … As was pointedly said in Schlossberg v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J.F. VS. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES (DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 4, 2019

    A-0807-17T4 J.F., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … In re Estate of Brown, 448 N.J. Super. 252, 256 (App. Div. 2017) (quoting Estate of DeMartino v. Div. of Med. Assistance & Health Servs., 373 N.J. Super. 210, 217 (App. Div. 2004)); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1396-1.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.