Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.40s

  • Paff v. Director, Office of Attorney Ethics

    399 N.J. Super. 632 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 2007

    In R.M. v. … Against this backdrop, there is no entitlement to documents or reports in the possession of the Disciplinary Review Board prior to the filing of a complaint. Both parties cite Nixon v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Stephanie Siegel v. Sahar Aziz

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 2025

    Aziz v. … In Aziz v. Nikitinsky, No.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • ANNA BERMEO VS. MARIO BERMEO (FM-13-1076-14, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    457 N.J. Super. 77 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 2018

    Brown, attorney for respondent. The opinion of the court was delivered by FIRKO, J.S.C. … The parties have been explained the cases of Crews v. Crews,[3] and Lepis v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Wyman

    232 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 1989

    The trial court sentenced defendant to probation for one year, on the condition that he serve 30 days in the Atlantic County Jail, and assessed a penalty of $30, payable to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. … See State v. Paolino, 110 N.J. Super. 284, 285 (App.Div. 1970), certif. den., 57 N.J. 127 (1970). See also United States v. Saadya, 750 F. 2d 1419, 1420 (9th Cir.1985). Cf. State v. Ciniglio, 57 N.J.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bower v. the Estaugh

    146 N.J. Super. 116 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 1977

    Brown, Cannery, Kulp, Wille, Purnell & Greene, attorneys; Mr. Steven J. Misner, on the brief). PER CURIAM. … See Bendit v. Intarante, 70 N.J. Super. 116, 125-126 (App. Div. 1961); Eisenhardt v. Schmidt, 27 N.J. Super. 76, 90 (Ch. Div. 1953); Michaels v. Donato, 4 N.J. Super. 570, 573-574 (Ch.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • WORLD WHEAT FOUNDATION, INC. VS. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SADDLEBROOK (L-3217-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 20, 2017

    , 2017 Before Judges Simonelli, Carroll and Gooden Brown. … See Dresner v. Carrara, 69 N.J. 237 (1976); Ric-Cic Co. v. Bassinder, 252 N.J. Super. 334 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Monmouth Cty. Div. of Social Services v. Djd

    344 N.J. Super. 74 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 2001

    Camden County Board of Social Services v. Yocavitch, supra at 31-32, 596 A.2d 769 . There must also be some "positive *1139 action" by the obligor that interferes with the natural parent's support obligation, Miller v. … Also see Camden County Board of Social Services v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne & Co.

    26 N.J. Super. 477 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 10, 1953

    The notice of the board meeting was served on plaintiff on March 8, 1948. Markowitz stated that some time in 1948 he asked Mr. … Brown, 20 N.J. Super. 85 ( App. Div. 1952); Mayer Ice Mach. & Eng. Co. v. Van Voorhis, 88 N.J.L. 7 ( Sup. Ct. 1915).

    Modified by William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne & Co., 29 N.J. Super. 316 (1954)Cited 29 timesPublished
  • State v. Home Fuel Oil Co. of Ridgewood

    6 N.J. Super. 414 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 25, 1949

    State Board v. Curtis, 94 N.J.L. 324 (affirmed, 95 N.J.L. 551 ), and see State v. Lakewood Market Co., 84 N.J.L. 512 . There has not been submitted to me any copy of the ordinance alleged to have been violated. … See Cahill v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 56 N.J.L. 445 , and State Board v. Curtis, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Market Holding Co. v. North Camden Trust Co.

    123 N.J. Eq. 328 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 10, 1938

    trust company, on separate and independent obligations in nowise involving complainants, in the total sum of $27,000; and on July 25th, 1935, the treasurer of the trust company informed Carr, by letter, that the company’s board … Kamena v. Huelbig, 23 N. J. Eq. 78; Woodruff v. Morris- *332 town Institution for Savings, 34 N. J. Eq. 174; Jenkinson v. New York Finance Co., 79 N. J. Eq. 247; Titus v. Hoagland, 39 N. J. Eq. 294; Pom. Eq.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Butler Oak Tavern v. DIV. OF ALCO. BEV. CONTROL

    36 N.J. Super. 512 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 22, 1955

    Div. 1952); Mitchell v. Cavicchia, 29 N.J. Super. 11 ( App. Div. 1953); Benedetti v. Board of Commissioners of Trenton, 35 N.J. Super. 30, 35 ( App. Div. 1955). … Meehan v. Board of Excise Commissioners, 73 N.J.L. 382, 387 ( Sup. Ct. 1906), affirmed 75 N.J.L. 557 ( E. & A. 1908).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Toll Bros. v. Township of West Windsor

    303 N.J. Super. 518 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1996

    Van Dalen v. … Corp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. WYETH, INC.

    422 N.J. Super. 343 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 2008

    Brovm v. Brown, 208 N.J.Super 372, 384, 506 A. 2d 29 (App.Div.1986) (finding entire-controversy defense waived, in marital tort action, when made on eve of trial after two-and-a-half years of litigation). … Kositsky v. Wyeth, Inc. This case was consolidated with De-Board v. Wyeth, Inc., for trial. [19] The initial trial date was set for November 26, 2007, Pursuant to the order dated February 15, 2007.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Center for Molecular Med. v. Tp. of Belleville

    357 N.J. Super. 41 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 2003

    In Lake End Corp. v. … See e.g., City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 54 N.J. 171, 186 , 254 A. 2d 513 cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L. Ed.2d 452 (1969); Borough of Moonachie v. Port of N.Y.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Dawson v. Bunker Hill Plaza Associates

    289 N.J. Super. 309 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 1996

    Similarly, in Black v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co., 56 N.J. 63, 69-70, 265 A.2d 129 (1970) and Zentz v. Toop, 92 N.J.Super. 105, 108 , 222 A.2d 290 (App.Div.1966), aff 'd sub nom., Zentz v. Toop v. … The proofs tended to show that the trusses would have collapsed and plaintiffs would have sustained their injuries even if Haddonfield Lumber had not supplied defective boards.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Aflalo v. Aflalo

    295 N.J. Super. 527 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 29, 1996

    Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , *534 603, 81 S.Ct. 1144, 1145 , 6 L.Ed. 2d 563 (1961); Cantwell, supra, 310 U.S. at 303-304 , 60 S.Ct. at 903-904 . … McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203, 232 , 68 S.Ct. 461, 475 , 92 L.Ed. 649 (1948) (dissenting opinion). *544 IV CONCLUSION For these reasons, the court has denied the motion to be relieved as counsel.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Carroll

    256 N.J. Super. 575 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 20, 1992

    When Tony Dee signed the register he showed his address as 131 Brown Street in Fort Lee. There is no Brown Street in Fort Lee. … In Geders v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Mingin v. Continental Can Company

    171 N.J. Super. 148 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 26, 1979

    In Boggs v. … In Latham v. Technar, Inc., 390 F.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • ML Plainsboro Ltd. Partnership v. Township of Plainsboro

    16 N.J. Tax 250 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1997

    Great Adventure, Inc. v. Township of Jackson, supra, 10 N. … See Monsanto Co. v. Kearny, 8 N.J.Tax 109 (Tax Ct.1986).

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • MARILYN FLANZMAN VS. JENNY CRAIG, INC. (L-6238-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 13, 2018

    Morgan v. Sanford Brown Inst., 225 N.J. 289, 302-03 (2016). … See also, Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.