Case law

Sellers v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM

399 N.J. Super. 51 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 19, 2008

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Battaglia v. Union Cty. … Principles of equitable estoppel may also be applied to the Board for its actions. See Hemsey v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret.

D.I.A.L v. City of Clifton Construction Board of Appeals

218 N.J. Super. 74 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 5, 1987

See State v. Reed, 34 N.J. 554, 557 (1961); N.J. State Board Optometrists v. S.S. Kresge Co., 113 N.J.L. 287, 296 (Sup.Ct.1934), mod. on other grounds and aff’d 115 N.J.L. 495 (E. & A.1935). … Commerce v. N.J. Elec. Law Enforce. Comm., 82 N.J. 57, 82 (1980); Abelson’s, Inc. v. N.J. State Board of Optometrists, 5 N.J. 412, 424 (1950).

Vitacco v. Board of Education of the School District

347 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 2002

The matter was forwarded to the State Board of Education and on April 7, 2000, the State Board affirmed the commissioner’s determination. … Uricoli v. Police and Firemen's Retirement System, 91 N.J. 62, 77, 449 A.2d 1267 (1982).

Engleside at West Condominium Ass'n v. Land Use Board

301 N.J. Super. 628 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 1997

Cherney v. Matawan Borough Zoning Board of Adjustment, 221 N.J.Super. 141, 534 A.2d 41 (App.Div.1987); Grancagnola v. Verona Planning Board, 221 N.J.Super. 71, 533 A.2d 982 (App.Div.1987); Jantausch v. … Kramer v. Board, of Adjustment of Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965). That decision must be made on the basis of what was before the board and not on the basis of a trial de novo. Antonelli v.

Marques v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

264 N.J. Super. 416 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1993

Specifically, the board did not find sufficient evidence to prove that either physician acted in a manner which would constitute grounds for any Board action. … Accordingly, the Board has closed its investigation into this matter. The authority of the Board to investigate complaints such as that made by appellant is entirely discretionary. See Beck v.

Meyer v. BOARD, TEACHERS'PEN. & ANNUITY FUND

49 N.J. Super. 255 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 1958

MEYER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. SAMUEL S. SAGOTSKY, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER H. … Plaintiff can find no case in point by way of authority for her proposition with the possible exception of Shaw v. Board of Administration, 109 Cal. App. 2 d 770, 241 P. 2 d 635 ( Ct. App. 1952).

St. Mary's of Mt. Virgin's Church v. Board of Adjustment

14 N.J. Misc. 288 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 23, 1936

On appeal the board of adjustment found that the construction would be in violation of sections III and VI of the zoning ordinance but nevertheless resolved as follows: “Now therefore this Board finds and determines that … A church. * * * No exception shall be made to the provision of this section by the Board of Adjustment.” There are formal returns to the writ by the secretary of the board of adjustment and by the building inspector.

LePrince v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund

267 N.J. Super. 270 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 19, 1993

The Board considered and evaluated the standards and factors announced in Uricoli v. Police & Fire. Retirem. Sys., 91 N.J. 62 , 449 A.2d 1267 (1982). … State v.

City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation

309 N.J. Super. 476 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 1998

State v. Profaci, 56 N.J. 346, 350 , 266 A.2d 579 (1970) (citing Woodhouse v. Woodhouse, 17 N.J. 409, 416 , 111 A.2d 631 (1955)). … Switz v. Township of Middletown, 23 N.J. 580, 594 , 130 A.2d 15 (1957). New Jersey Chapter, Am. Inst. of Planners v.

City Ass'n of Supervisors & Administrators v. Board of Education

168 N.J. Super. 184 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 9, 1979

Thereafter CASA brought an action against the board of education for vindication of its alleged contract right to the position. … See Polshek v. Bergen Cty. Iron Works, 142 N. J. Super. 516 (Ch. Div. 1976); cf. Wm. *187 Blanchard Co. v. Beach Concrete Co., Inc., 150 N. J. Super. 277, 300 (App. Div. 1977), certif. den. 75 N. J. 528 (1977).

Branch Brook Gardens Tenants Ass'n v. Rent Leveling Board

177 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1980

Hutton Park Gardens v. … See, e. g., Helmsley v. Fort Lee, supra, 78 N.J. 200 ; Troy Hills Village v. Parsippany-Troy Hills, supra, 68 N.J. 604 ; Brunetti v. New Milford, 68 N.J. 576 (1975); Hutton Park Gardens v.

Doric Realty Co. v. Union City Rent Leveling Board

182 N.J. Super. 486 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 1981

See Berzito v. Gambino, 63 N.J. 460 (1973). Under the general principles set forth in Marini v. … Brown, 111 N.J.Super. 477 (Cty.D.Ct.1970), affd 108 N.J.Super. 395 (App.Div.1970), approved Berzito v.

Lincoln Heights Ass'n v. Township of Cranford Planning Board

321 N.J. Super. 355 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1999

Livingston v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

168 N.J. Super. 259 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1979

[Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. at 150, 93 S. … Roe v. Wade, supra, 410 U. S. at 163, 93 S. Ct 732 . Here, the State’s (and the Board’s) interest has clearly reached the “compelling” point, given the fact that *265 N. J. A.

City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation

124 N.J. Super. 76 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1973

Newark’s cross-appeal repeats its challenge to the Board’s use of the state equalization ratio and reasserts its claim that none of the V. A. and E. H. … Our Supreme Court has specifically held that a county board may adopt the ratios promulgated by the Director of Taxation. Passaic v. Passaic County Bd. of Taxation, supra; Greenwich Tp. v.

Passaic Township Board of Education v. Passaic Township Education Ass'n

222 N.J. Super. 298 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1987

Defendants recognize that the common law rule in New Jersey is that public employees do not have the right to strike, see Board of Education, *302 Borough of Union Beach v. New Jersey Educ. … Namm v. Charles E. Frost & Co., 178 N.J.Super. 19 , 35 (App.Div.1981).

James Moran v. Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen's Retirement System

438 N.J. Super. 346 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 25, 2014

Applying Richardson v. … See Cattani v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys. 69 N.J. 578, 586-87 (1978); Russo v.

Township of Mahwah v. Bergen County Board of Taxation

190 N.J. Super. 84 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 1983

See also Newark Superior Officers Ass’n v. Newark, 187 N.J.Super. 390 (App.Div.1982). Affirmed.

Gilhooly v. Zeta Psi Fraternity

243 N.J. Super. 201 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1990

Justice Garibaldi in Brown v. St. … Kirby v. Columbian Institute, 101 N.J.

City of Bayonne v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

30 N.J. Super. 520 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1954

It has been said broadly that the board was given by the Public Utilities Act full control of all public utilities, so far as could be done by legislation. Atlantic Coast Electric Ry. Co. v. … Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 92 N. J. L. 168, 175 (E. & A. 1918); Perth Amboy v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 98 N. J. L. 106, 108 (Sup. Ct. 1922); cf. as to crossings Hollinshead v. Atlantic City R. Co., 102 N.