Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.08s
194 N.J. Super. 307 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1984
Super. 307 (1984) 476 A.2d 874 LEROY STROMAN AND MATTIE STROMAN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MARGUERITE C. BROWN AND WILLIAM D. BROWN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … In Kulko v.
Cited 6 timesPublished379 N.J. Super. 165 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 2005
Super. 165 Lisa PUNGITORE and Anthony Pungitore, w/h, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Clyde J. BROWN, Jr., and Deann M. Cox, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted June 28, 2005. … In the consolidated cases of Beltran v. DeLima and Imerman v.
Cited 2 timesPublished113 N.J. Super. 348 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 1971
Super. 348 (1971) 273 A.2d 783 THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES E. BROWN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 2, 1971. … People v. Dudley, supra .
Cited 4 timesPublished387 N.J. Super. 279 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 3, 2006
Zulima V. Farber, Attorney General, for the New Jersey Merit System Board (Pamela N. Ullman, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). Before Judges C.S. FISHER, YANNOTTI and C.L. MINIMAN. … See also CWA Local 1044 v.
Cited 6 timesPublished55 N.J. Super. 469 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1959
JACOBY, PLAINTIFF, v. ROBERT L. BROWN, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided May 7, 1959. *470 Mr. Nathaniel A. Jacoby, attorney pro se. Mr. John M. Kolibas, attorney for defendant. … This court is of the opinion that the defendant Brown's term, as a matter of law, would not have expired until April 16, 1956, but that the action of the defendant Brown *474 in relinquishing his position as magistrate on
Cited 3 timesPublished80 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1963
BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH M. HEALEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 17, 1963. … McDonough v. Roach, 35 N.J. 153, 155 (1961). And see Ahto v. Weaver, 39 N.J. 418 (1963).
Cited 3 timesPublished272 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1993
The certification continues: “Since I have been unable to make personal service upon the defendant, Albert Brown, it is respectfully, requested that substituted service be allowed on the Unsatisfied Claim and Fund Board.” … Another defendant (Brown) had not been served. Mr.
Cited 2 timesPublished279 N.J. Super. 648 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1995
See also Softexture Yarns, Inc. v. Board of Review, 59 N.J.Super. 57 , 157 A.2d 142 (App.Div.1960); Charles Headwear; Inc. v. Board of Review, 11 N.J.Super. 321 , 78 A.2d 306 (App.Div.1951). … its own hearing to create an adequate record or to supplement the existing record; it could even have ordered the Appeal *652 Tribunal and the parties to reconstruct the missing portions of the record, see, e.g., State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished311 N.J. Super. 273 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1997
Her stepbrother, defendant Timothy Brown, came into her room and asked if he could watch television in her room, and then if he could sleep in her bed. … Furthermore, in People v. Armstrong, 212 Mich.App. 121 , 536 N.W.2d 789 (1995), the defendant was the step-brother of the victim.
Cited 2 timesPublished149 N.J. Super. 86 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1977
Cited 0 timesPublished157 N.J. Super. 110 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 1978
State v. Sapp, supra, can profitably be compared with State v. Gaines, 135 N. J. Super. 240 (App. Div. 1975), aff’d o. b. 75 N. J. 83 (1977). … See State v. Humphreys, 54 N.
Reversed on other grounds by State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587 (1979)Cited 2 timesPublished50 N.J. Eq. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 1892
Welsh v. Brown, 14 Vr. 37 . At the foot of this receipt- is a short account, as follows: -“X C. … Eq. 348; Ackerman v. Blauvelt, 8 C. E. Gr. 495; S. C. on appeal, 10 C. E. Gr. 570; Dufford v. Smith, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 222), and also by depriving-him of compensation. Elmer v. Loper, 10 C. E. Gr. 475, 482; Dufford v.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 N.J. Eq. 533 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1863
On the contrary the decree itself, as if by way of substitute for the legal notice, states that Brown, the minor, appeared by his guardian, David Yates.
Cited 0 timesPublished289 N.J. Super. 285 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 1996
THE INSTANT CASE DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED THRESHOLD TO TRIGGER THE COURT’S SCRUTINY UNDER STATE V. MURPHY OR R. 3:6-3(a). … Following argument, the judge concluded that under State v.
Cited 2 timesPublished42 N.J. Eq. 356 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1886
Brown, deceased, to probate, appointed James R. English administrator pendente lite, on the 28th of April, 1886. … Chanter, 2 Phillips 545 ; Scoffield v. Craddock, 7 Harr. & Johns. 40; Smith v. Davis, 45 H. H. 566; Cowles v. Hayes, 71 N. C. 230 ; Morrison v. Cones, 7 Blackf. 593 ; Broach v. Walker, 2 Ga. 428 ; Hunt v.
Cited 1 timesPublished411 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 2009
No. 3, Piscataway v. … In Van Holten Group v.
Cited 14 timesPublished8 N.J. Super. 103 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1950
BECK, SUBSTITUTED TRUSTEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERNEST T. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 8, 1950. … Passage v. McVeigh, 23 N.J.L. 729 ( E. & A. 1852); Wilkinson v. Lyons, 87 N.J.L. 200 ( E. & *106 A. 1914).
Cited 1 timesPublished19 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1952
Brown, is the vendee, and the defendant, T. Joseph Binn, the assignee, of a written contract for the purchase of real estate owned by the plaintiffs. … Shultz v. Sanders, 38 N. J. Eq. 154 (Ch. 1884), affirmed sub nom. Eisberg v. Shultz, 38 N. J. Eq. 293 (E. & A. 1884); Wilkes v. Brennan, 139 N. J. Eq. 445 (Ch. 1947); Andes v. Boyajian, 12 N. J. Super. 344 (Ch.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education v. Board of Education
257 N.J. Super. 413 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1992
Our Supreme Court long ago recognized this principle in Morean and Booker , cases decided in the afterglow of Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). … Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 311-13 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2566-67 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520, 524-25 (1976); San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 93 S.Ct. 1278, 1287 , 36 L.Ed.2d 16, 33 (1973); Brown v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM J. THOMAS (80-12-1541, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 2022
State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 414 4 A-4368-19 sentences with no parole disqualifiers. … Thomas v. N.J. State Parole Bd., No. A-2649-05 (App. Div. Aug. 22, 2007). He next appealed the Board's May 25, 2011 decision that denied parole and imposed another eighty-four-month FET. We affirmed. Thomas v. N.J.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna