Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.08s

  • Stroman v. Brown

    194 N.J. Super. 307 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1984

    Super. 307 (1984) 476 A.2d 874 LEROY STROMAN AND MATTIE STROMAN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MARGUERITE C. BROWN AND WILLIAM D. BROWN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … In Kulko v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pungitore v. Brown

    379 N.J. Super. 165 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 2005

    Super. 165 Lisa PUNGITORE and Anthony Pungitore, w/h, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Clyde J. BROWN, Jr., and Deann M. Cox, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted June 28, 2005. … In the consolidated cases of Beltran v. DeLima and Imerman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    113 N.J. Super. 348 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 1971

    Super. 348 (1971) 273 A.2d 783 THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES E. BROWN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 2, 1971. … People v. Dudley, supra .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Thurber v. City of Burlington

    387 N.J. Super. 279 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 3, 2006

    Zulima V. Farber, Attorney General, for the New Jersey Merit System Board (Pamela N. Ullman, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). Before Judges C.S. FISHER, YANNOTTI and C.L. MINIMAN. … See also CWA Local 1044 v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jacoby v. Brown

    55 N.J. Super. 469 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1959

    JACOBY, PLAINTIFF, v. ROBERT L. BROWN, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided May 7, 1959. *470 Mr. Nathaniel A. Jacoby, attorney pro se. Mr. John M. Kolibas, attorney for defendant. … This court is of the opinion that the defendant Brown's term, as a matter of law, would not have expired until April 16, 1956, but that the action of the defendant Brown *474 in relinquishing his position as magistrate on

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Healey

    80 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1963

    BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH M. HEALEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 17, 1963. … McDonough v. Roach, 35 N.J. 153, 155 (1961). And see Ahto v. Weaver, 39 N.J. 418 (1963).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Brown

    272 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1993

    The certification continues: “Since I have been unable to make personal service upon the defendant, Albert Brown, it is respectfully, requested that substituted service be allowed on the Unsatisfied Claim and Fund Board.” … Another defendant (Brown) had not been served. Mr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Brown

    279 N.J. Super. 648 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1995

    See also Softexture Yarns, Inc. v. Board of Review, 59 N.J.Super. 57 , 157 A.2d 142 (App.Div.1960); Charles Headwear; Inc. v. Board of Review, 11 N.J.Super. 321 , 78 A.2d 306 (App.Div.1951). … its own hearing to create an adequate record or to supplement the existing record; it could even have ordered the Appeal *652 Tribunal and the parties to reconstruct the missing portions of the record, see, e.g., State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    311 N.J. Super. 273 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1997

    Her stepbrother, defendant Timothy Brown, came into her room and asked if he could watch television in her room, and then if he could sleep in her bed. … Furthermore, in People v. Armstrong, 212 Mich.App. 121 , 536 N.W.2d 789 (1995), the defendant was the step-brother of the victim.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smeriglio v. Brown

    149 N.J. Super. 86 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    157 N.J. Super. 110 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 1978

    State v. Sapp, supra, can profitably be compared with State v. Gaines, 135 N. J. Super. 240 (App. Div. 1975), aff’d o. b. 75 N. J. 83 (1977). … See State v. Humphreys, 54 N.

    Reversed on other grounds by State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587 (1979)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Welsh v. Brown

    50 N.J. Eq. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 1892

    Welsh v. Brown, 14 Vr. 37 . At the foot of this receipt- is a short account, as follows: -“X C. … Eq. 348; Ackerman v. Blauvelt, 8 C. E. Gr. 495; S. C. on appeal, 10 C. E. Gr. 570; Dufford v. Smith, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 222), and also by depriving-him of compensation. Elmer v. Loper, 10 C. E. Gr. 475, 482; Dufford v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Culver v. Brown

    16 N.J. Eq. 533 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1863

    On the contrary the decree itself, as if by way of substitute for the legal notice, states that Brown, the minor, appeared by his guardian, David Yates.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    289 N.J. Super. 285 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 1996

    THE INSTANT CASE DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED THRESHOLD TO TRIGGER THE COURT’S SCRUTINY UNDER STATE V. MURPHY OR R. 3:6-3(a). … Following argument, the judge concluded that under State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ryder

    42 N.J. Eq. 356 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1886

    Brown, deceased, to probate, appointed James R. English administrator pendente lite, on the 28th of April, 1886. … Chanter, 2 Phillips 545 ; Scoffield v. Craddock, 7 Harr. & Johns. 40; Smith v. Davis, 45 H. H. 566; Cowles v. Hayes, 71 N. C. 230 ; Morrison v. Cones, 7 Blackf. 593 ; Broach v. Walker, 2 Ga. 428 ; Hunt v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Centex Homes, LLC

    411 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 2009

    No. 3, Piscataway v. … In Van Holten Group v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Beck v. Brown

    8 N.J. Super. 103 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1950

    BECK, SUBSTITUTED TRUSTEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERNEST T. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 8, 1950. … Passage v. McVeigh, 23 N.J.L. 729 ( E. & A. 1852); Wilkinson v. Lyons, 87 N.J.L. 200 ( E. & *106 A. 1914).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. Brown

    19 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1952

    Brown, is the vendee, and the defendant, T. Joseph Binn, the assignee, of a written contract for the purchase of real estate owned by the plaintiffs. … Shultz v. Sanders, 38 N. J. Eq. 154 (Ch. 1884), affirmed sub nom. Eisberg v. Shultz, 38 N. J. Eq. 293 (E. & A. 1884); Wilkes v. Brennan, 139 N. J. Eq. 445 (Ch. 1947); Andes v. Boyajian, 12 N. J. Super. 344 (Ch.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Board of Education v. Board of Education

    257 N.J. Super. 413 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1992

    Our Supreme Court long ago recognized this principle in Morean and Booker , cases decided in the afterglow of Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). … Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 311-13 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2566-67 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520, 524-25 (1976); San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 93 S.Ct. 1278, 1287 , 36 L.Ed.2d 16, 33 (1973); Brown v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM J. THOMAS (80-12-1541, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 2022

    State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 414 4 A-4368-19 sentences with no parole disqualifiers. … Thomas v. N.J. State Parole Bd., No. A-2649-05 (App. Div. Aug. 22, 2007). He next appealed the Board's May 25, 2011 decision that denied parole and imposed another eighty-four-month FET. We affirmed. Thomas v. N.J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.