Case law

Kugler v. Banner Pontiac-Buick, Opel, Inc.

120 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1972

Clifton v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 28 N.J. 411, 421 (1958) (emphasis supplied). In Kugler v. … Nat'l Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin, 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 (1937).

SAIF v. Fama Const. Co.

353 N.J. Super. 131 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 2001

In May fair Fabrics v. … Co. v.

IN RE N.J.A.C. 6A:8 STANDARDS AND ASSESSMENT (NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 31, 2018

of Education (the Board). … Gerety v. Atl.

Aljian v. Ben Schlossberg, Inc.

8 N.J. Super. 461 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 3, 1950

In Hubbard v. The St. Louis & M.R.R. … In Brown v.

DARRELL B. BROWN VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY (L-1538-16, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 3, 2020

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … See State v.

Feist v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.

30 N.J. Super. 153 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 1954

Feick v. Hill Bread Co., 91 N.J.L. 486 ; 103 A. 813 , affirmed 92 N.J.L. 513 ; 105 A. 725 ." Vide Bruning v. Hoboken Printing & Publishing Co., 67 N.J.L. 119 ( Sup. Ct. 1902); Morris v. … Vernam v. Scott, 12 N.J. Misc. 177 ." Cf. Feick v. Hill Bread Co., 91 N.J.L. 486 ( Sup. Ct. 1918), affirmed 92 N.J.L. 513 ( E. & A. 1918); Brown v. Central Home Trust Co., 129 N.J.L. 213 ( Sup. Ct. 1942); Rosenbaum v.

RICHARD CAPPARELLI VS. MATT LOPATIN (C-000153-17, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 2019

. __________________________ Submitted February 25, 2019 – Decided June 25, 2019 Before Judges Messano, Gooden Brown and Rose. … The opinion of the court was delivered by GOODEN BROWN, J.A.D. Plaintiff and defendant are former business partners.

Manda v. State

28 N.J. Super. 259 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 6, 1953

See State v. Smith, 6 N.J. Super. 85, 90 ( App. Div. 1949); State v. Simpkins, 8 N.J. Super. 194 ( App. Div. 1950). … Pescor, 163 F. 2 d 775 (8 Cir., 1947), certiorari denied 333 U.S. 846 , 68 S.Ct. 648 , 92 L.Ed. 1129 (1948); Brown v. Pescor, 74 F. Supp. 549 ( D.C. Mo. 1947); D'Ostroph v. Pescor, 7 F.R.D. 569 ( D.C. Mo. 1947).

Salvador v. Department of Corrections

378 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 2005

See Meyer v. … State v. Austin, 335 N.J.Super. 486, 491 , 762 A.2d 1052 (App.Div.2000), certif. denied, 168 N.J. 294 , 773 A.2d 1157 (2001).

Mays v. Penza

179 N.J. Super. 185 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 12, 1981

Meyner, 13 N.J. 185, 197 (1953); In re Atlantic County Board of Elections, 117 N.J.Super. 244 (App.Div.1971); Riecker v. Hartmann, 130 N.J.Super. 266 (Law Div. 1974). … See Mulcahy v. Bergen County Board of Elections, 156 N.J.Super. 429 (Law Div. 1978), application of Moffat, 142 N.J.Super. 217 (App.Div.1976) and Republican Committee of Garwood v.

Tooker v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.

128 N.J. Super. 217 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1974

See Odolecki v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 55 N.J. 542, 550 (1970); State Farm v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., supra . In fact, in Indemnity Ins. Co., etc. v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. … Brown v. Kennedy, 141 Ohio St. 457 , 48 N.E. 2 d 857 (Sup. Ct. 1943); Maryland Casualty Company v. Marshbank, 226 F. 2 d 637 (3 Cir.1955). One who operates a car uses it, Cronan v.

SCHOWL HEDVAT VS. TENAFLY PLANNING BOARD AND BOROUGH OF TENAFLY(L-0993-12, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 9, 2017

Towers, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of W. Paterson, 327 N.J. Super. 476, 494 (App. Div. 2000)). The Board's conclusions of law, however, are subject to de novo review. Nuckel v. … Zaman v. Felton, 219 N.J. 226-27 (2014) (citation omitted). We also will not consider documents not presented to the Board or Judge Toskos. See N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v.

CITIZENS FOR CHARTER CHANGE, ESSEX CTY v. Caputo

136 N.J. Super. 424 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 6, 1975

ZINN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-CHAIRMAN, TREASURER AND MEMBER, RESPECTIVELY, OF CITIZENS FOR CHARTER CHANGE IN ESSEX COUNTY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NICHOLAS V. … Corp. v. Atlantic Cty. Sewerage Auth., 67 N.J. 403, 415 (1975).

Alexander S. v. Paramus Bor.

243 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 1990

The second irregularity was Paramus's failure to present the proposed amendments to the planning board for its review. That contention survived. … Hills Development v. Bernards Tp., 229 N.J.

In re the Pemberton Township Municipal Utilities Authority

205 N.J. Super. 31 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1985

Jordan v. … East Orange v. Civil Service Com., 132 N.J.L. 181 (Sup.Ct.1944). [129 N.J. Super, at 339]. See also Oughton v. Board of Fire Comm’rs, 178 N.J.

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE BOROUGH OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, ETC. (L-6119-15, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 2022

. ___________________________ Argued April 6, 2022 – Decided July 15, 2022 Before Judges Gilson, Gooden Brown, and Gummer. … See Piscitelli v. City of Garfield Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 237 N.J. 333, 349-50 (2019); Grabowsky v. Twp. of Montclair, 221 N.J. 536, 552 (2015).

Zotta v. Otis Elevator Co.

64 N.J. Super. 344 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 5, 1960

Maio v. Fahs, 339 Pa. 180 , 14 A. 2 d 105 ( Sup. Ct. 1940); Rau v. Manko, 341 Pa. 17 , 17 A. 2 d 422 ( Sup. Ct. 1941); Shaull v. A.S. Beck New York Shoe Co., 369 Pa. 112 , 85 A. 2 d 698 ( Sup. Ct. 1952); Puller v. … Ct. 1955); Davis v. Miller, 385 Pa. 348 , 123 A. 2 d 422 ( Sup. Ct. 1956); Brown v. Dickey, 397 Pa. 454 , 155 A. 2 d 836 ( Sup. Ct. 1959); Fisher v. Diehl, 156 Pa. Super. 476 , 40 A. 2 d 912 ( Super.

Kurtz v. Oremland

29 N.J. Super. 585 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 8, 1954

Plaintiffs primarily base this conclusion upon the cases of Walkoczy v. Bowers, N.J. Sup., 146 A. 34 ( Sup. Ct. 1929) and Pickford v. Kravetz, 17 F.R.S. (4 d. 121), case 1 ( D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1952). … Walkoczy v. Bowers, supra ; 72 C.J.S. 1043.

Garlinger v. Garlinger

129 N.J. Super. 37 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1974

At the hearing it was admitted that the paramour lived with defendant for several months and while the child was in the house, that he and defendant engaged in sexual intercourse, that he made no payment for *39 room or board … Compare Stanfield v. Stanfield, 22 Okl. 574 , 98 P. 334 (Sup. Ct. 1908); Cariens v. Cariens, 50 W. Va. 113 , 40 S.E. 335 (Sup. Ct. 1901); Lott v. Lott, 213 Ga. 559 , 100 S.E. 2d 170 (Sup. Ct. 1959), and Bowman v.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Poliakoff

123 N.J. Eq. 524 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 6, 1938

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Brown (Ky.), 300 S.W. Rep. 599 . But the concern of the Electric Company ceased when Matwijizyn left its employ, permanently disabled, and the policy became payable. … Lanigan's Adm'r v. Bradley Currier Co., Ltd., 50 N.J. Eq. 201 ; American Pin Co. v. Wright, 60 N.J. Eq. 147 ; Myers v. Forest Hill Gardens Co., 103 N.J. Eq. 1 ; affirmed, 105 N.J. Eq. 584 .