Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.14s

  • Erickson v. Winthrop Laboratories

    249 N.J. Super. 137 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 1991

    In PSE & G v. Aegis, 745 F. … Lazorick v. Brown, 195 N.J. Super. 444 , 480 A. 2d 223 (App.Div. 1984). This opinion does not establish such a right nor does it hide any witnesses from any party.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Carlucci v. Carlucci

    265 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 23, 1993

    See also North Bergen Action Group v. Planning Board, 122 N.J. 567 , 585 A. 2d 939 (1991) (appeal of Law Division reversal of zoning variance *341 precludes proceeding before municipal agency); Rolnick v. … Super. 508 , 403 A. 2d 921 (App.Div. 1979) (appeal of entire Planning Board decision precludes consideration of additional conditions imposed by Board); Muschette v. Gateway Ins. Co., 149 N.J.

    Disapproved in part by Kiernan v. Kiernan, 355 N.J. Super. 89 (2002)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. C.H.

    264 N.J. Super. 112 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1993

    Defendant was also assessed a $120 Violent Crimes Compensation Board penalty. FACTS This case involves a young girl (A.P.) who told numerous witnesses about how she was sexually abused. … Brown, 46 N.J. 96, 101 , 215 A.2d 9 (1965), and if on reading the *137 charge as a whole, ‘prejudicial error does not appear then the verdict must stand.’ ” State v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Tomeo v. Northern Valley Swim Club

    201 N.J. Super. 416 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 6, 1985

    Browne, Buckalew & DeMarrais, attorneys for appellant ( Michael DeMarrais on the brief). Harwood, Lloyd, Ryan, Coyle & McBride, attorneys for respondent ( Bernadette Gordon on the brief). … Pierre v. Houde, 269 A. 2d 538, 540 (Me.Sup.Jud.Ct. 1970). Having to advise the jury in these circumstances that a defendant is insured would ordinarily not be a reason to declare a mistrial. See Runnacles v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Wemrock Orchards, Inc.

    95 N.J. Super. 25 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 1967

    State Highway Com. v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of Town of Dover, 109 N.J.L. 303, 307 ( E. & A. 1932). … We cited the rule noted above and the case of State Highway Com. v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of Town of Dover, supra .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Feiler v. New Jersey Dental Ass'n

    199 N.J. Super. 363 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1984

    Thus, in Westphal v. Guarino, 163 N.J. … In so doing, we relied on Brown v. Mortimer, 100 N.J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Rafferzeder Ex Rel. Rafferzeder v. Raleigh Fitkin, Memorial Hospital

    30 N.J. Super. 82 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1954

    Dana College v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 14 N.J. Misc. 308 ( Sup. Ct. 1936), affirmed 117 N.J.L. 530 ( E. & A. 1937). The charitable character of the association depends upon the facts. Cf. Montclair v. … State Board of Equalization of Taxes, 86 N.J.L. 497 ( Sup. Ct. 1914), affirmed 88 N.J.L. 374 ( E. & A. 1915); Kimberley School v. Town of Montclair, 2 N.J. 28 (1949).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Hatterer

    75 N.J. Super. 400 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1962

    However, it provides that "[i]n case of any flagrant misconduct the board of managers may declare a forfeiture of the time previously remitted, either in whole or in part, as to them shall seem just." … Zink v. Lear, 28 N.J. Super. 515 ( App. Div. 1953). As for defendant's claim that he was not arraigned before a magistrate, State v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Spencer Savings Bank, S.L.A. v. Arthur Wein

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 2026

    The appeal arises out of the latest effort by the Bank's board of directors (the Board) to convert the Bank from a mutual savings and loan association to a mutual savings bank. In Seidman v. … LoBiondo v. Schwartz, 199 N.J. 62, 95 (2009).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Frank v. Ivy Club

    228 N.J. Super. 40 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 4, 1988

    Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees, 77 N.J. 55, 80 (1978). … See New York State Club Assoc. v. New York City, 487 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 2225 , 101 L.Ed. 2d 1 (1988); Board of Directors of Rotary Int'l v. Rotary Club, 481 U.S. 537 , 107 S.Ct. 1940 , 95 L.Ed. 2d 474 (1987).

    Reversed on other grounds by Frank v. Ivy Club, 120 N.J. 73 (1990)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hynes v. Clarke

    297 N.J. Super. 44 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 1997

    Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 96 N.J. 336, 343 , 476 A.2d 250 (1984), and citing Cogdell, supra, 116 N.J. at 27 , 560 A.2d 1169 ; Cafferata v. Peyser, 251 N.J.Super. 256, 261 , 597 A.2d 1101 (App.Div.1991); Brown v. … Brown, 208 N.J.Super. 372 , 506 A.2d 29 (App.Div.1986)).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Silagy v. State

    105 N.J. Super. 507 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 12, 1969

    Board of Com'rs of Eagle County v. Evans, 99 Colo. 83 , 60 P. 2 d 225, 227 ( Sup. Ct. 1936); Seward v. Bernallilo County, 61 N.M. 52 , 294 P. 2 d 625 ( Sup. Ct. 1956); Jochen v. … See e.g., Hannigan v. Goldfarb, 53 N.J. Super. 190, 195 ( App. Div. 1958); O'Brien v. First Camden Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 37 N.J. 158, 162-163 (1962).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Garden State Outdoor, LLC v. City of Somers Point

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 2026

    Worthington v. … "Zoning boards may choose which witnesses, including expert witnesses, to believe." Bd. of Educ. of Clifton v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • King v. Patrylow

    15 N.J. Super. 429 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1951

    Smith v. Bosco, 126 N.J.L. 452 ( E. & A. 1941); Holler v. Ross, 68 N.J.L. 324 ( E. & A. 1902); Moore v. Camden & Trenton Railway Co., 74 N.J.L. 498 ( E. & A. 1907); Gindin v. Baron, 11 N.J. Super. 215 ( App. Div. 1951). … Ct. 1909); Collins v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J., 90 N.J.L. 593 ( E. & A. 1917); Brown v. Public Service Ry. Co., 98 N.J.L. 747 ( E. & A. 1923). Reversed with direction for a new trial. Costs to abide the event.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Pool v. Morristown Memorial Hosp.

    400 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 2008

    Ramos v. Browning Ferris Indus., Inc., 103 N.J. 177, 183 , 510 A. 2d 1152 (1986). … Frazier v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., 142 N.J. 590, 596-97 , 667 A. 2d 670 (1995).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Town of Nutley v. Forney

    116 N.J. Super. 567 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1971

    Marangi Bros. v. Board of Comm'rs of Ridgewood, 33 N.J. Super. 294 (App. Div. 1954). In the case of Jones v. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Comm'rs, 87 N.J.L. 170 (E. & A. 1915). In Annett v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Kinsley

    103 N.J. Super. 190 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 14, 1968

    State v. Chiarello, 69 N.J. Super. 479 ( App. Div. 1961), cert. denied 36 N.J. 301 (1962), State, Borough of East Paterson, Board of Health v. Elmwood Terrace, Inc., 85 N.J. Super. 240, 247 ( App. Div. 1964). State v. … Morss v. Forbes, 24 N.J. 341 (1957), State v. Segal, 78 N.J. Super. 273 ( App. Div. 1963). State v. Segal involved a violation of the adoption statutes. In State v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Kugler v. Banner Pontiac-Buick, Opel, Inc.

    120 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1972

    Clifton v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 28 N.J. 411, 421 (1958) (emphasis supplied). In Kugler v. … Nat'l Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin, 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 (1937).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Garlinger v. Garlinger

    129 N.J. Super. 37 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1974

    At the hearing it was admitted that the paramour lived with defendant for several months and while the child was in the house, that he and defendant engaged in sexual intercourse, that he made no payment for *39 room or board … Compare Stanfield v. Stanfield, 22 Okl. 574 , 98 P. 334 (Sup. Ct. 1908); Cariens v. Cariens, 50 W. Va. 113 , 40 S.E. 335 (Sup. Ct. 1901); Lott v. Lott, 213 Ga. 559 , 100 S.E. 2d 170 (Sup. Ct. 1959), and Bowman v.

    Modified by Garlinger v. Garlinger, 137 N.J. Super. 56 (1975)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • SAIF v. Fama Const. Co.

    353 N.J. Super. 131 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 2001

    In May fair Fabrics v. … Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.