Case law

KEVIN SABATINI VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 2019

A-4935-16T1 KEVIN SABATINI, Appellant, v. … Appellant argued that Plumeri's participation in the Board's decision violated the Board's Code of Professional Conduct.

Gentile v. National Newark & Essex Bkg. Co.

53 N.J. Super. 35 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 1958

Honey v. Brown, 22 N.J. 433, 438 (1956). We summarize the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. … Hartman v. Brigantine, 23 N.J. 530 , 536 (1957). Cf. Krug v. Wanner, 28 N.J. 174 (1958).

Kise v. Heath

33 N.J. Eq. 239 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1880

From there she went to the house of her son-in-law, Reading Housel, and remained there until the fall of 1878, when she went to board at the house of her grandson, Samuel Housel, where she lived until her death, which occurred … See also Boyse v. Rossborough, 6 H. of L. Cas. 2. There does not appear to have been any undue influence when the draft of the will was read and approved, or when the will was executed. Giving to the remark made by Mrs.

Paige v. Red Top, Inc.

106 N.J. Super. 254 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1969

. *258 As the Supreme Court said in Trautman v. Higbie, 10 N.J. 239, 244 (1952) and reiterated in Honey v. … Brown, 22 N.J. 433, 439 (1956): "Where one operates a vehicle under a governmental franchise in the field controlled thereby he assumes liability for the acts done by others to whom he grants permission to use that franchise

Kruvant v. Kruvant

100 N.J. Super. 107 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 18, 1968

Among the cases discussing the subject are Cromwell v. Benjamin, Sup. 1863, 41 Barb. N.Y. 558: Alger v. Miller, 56 Barb. 227 ; Matter of VanDenburgh, 178 App. Div. 237 , 164 N.Y.S. 966 ; Brown v. … Wells v. Wells, supra; 67 C.J.S. Parent and Child § 17, p. 704 (1950); 39 Am. Jur., Parent and Child, § 69, p. 710 (1942); cf. Brown v. Ramsay, 29 N.J.L. 117 , 120 ( Sup. Ct. 1860); Wood v. Morris & Co., 2 N.J.

State v. Pindale

279 N.J. Super. 123 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 1995

Violent Crimes Compensation Board penalties, aggregating $7,560, were also imposed. … The judge also imposed a $150 aggregate Violent Crimes Compensation Board penalty. Defendant appeals to us and argues: POINT I THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL.

State v. Zicarelli

154 N.J. Super. 347 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 1977

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 474 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 416 , 97 L.Ed. 469, 498 (1953). … Maryland v. Brown, 295 F. Supp. 63 (D.C. Md. 1969). Underlying the Alvarado and Jones opinions is, we believe, a conception of a jury's role which may well differ from the New Jersey conception thereof.

Association for Governmental Responsibility, Ethics and Transparency v. Borough of Mantoloking

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 2024

In O'Shea, the West Milford Board of Education received a request for, among other documents, the meeting minutes from the Board's executive session. Id. at 536. … The GRC ultimately agreed with the Board, and we affirmed. Id. at 537.

Murnick v. Asbury Park

187 N.J. Super. 455 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 24, 1982

Murnick v. Asbury Park, 2 N.J. Tax 168 (1981). … Similarly, in Piscataway Assoc., Inc., v.

Frueh v. Kupper

54 N.J. Super. 296 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1959

In Green v. Simpson & Brown Const. Co., 14 N.J. 66 (1953), our Supreme Court recognized that state law is ineffective to create rights of action for personal injuries incurred while upon navigable waters. … Pa. 1939); Brown v. Cranston, 132 F. 2 d 631, 148 A.L.R. 1178 (2 Cir. 1942); Friend v. Middle Atlantic Transportation Co., 153 F. 2 d 778 (2 Cir. 1945).

Carlucci v. Carlucci

265 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 23, 1993

See also North Bergen Action Group v. Planning Board, 122 N.J. 567 , 585 A. 2d 939 (1991) (appeal of Law Division reversal of zoning variance *341 precludes proceeding before municipal agency); Rolnick v. … Super. 508 , 403 A. 2d 921 (App.Div. 1979) (appeal of entire Planning Board decision precludes consideration of additional conditions imposed by Board); Muschette v. Gateway Ins. Co., 149 N.J.

State v. Gosnell

106 N.J. Super. 279 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1969

Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille, attorneys; Mr. Charles A. Cohen, on the brief). PER CURIAM. Frank H. Gosnell was killed in an accident on January 7, 1959. … Plaintiffs rely heavily on Kolakowski v. Thomas Mfg. Corp., 88 N.J. Super. 478 ( App. Div. 1965), certification denied 45 N.J. 595 (1965) and Santiago v. New Jersey Fireworks Mfg. Co., Inc., 88 N.J. Super. 495 ( App.

State v. Heine

424 N.J. Super. 48 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 2012

rooming or boarding house, a search warrant shall be obtained by the Bureau in any court having jurisdiction. … In State v.

In the Matter of Shawn Giordano, Lacey Township Board of Education, Ocean County

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 2025

Donnerstag v. Borawski, 481 N.J. Super. 311, 322 (App. Div. 2025) (quoting Sager v. O.A. Peterson Constr., Co., 182 N.J. 156, 164 (2004)). … Grabowsky v. Township of Montclair, 221 N.J. 536, 551 (2015) (alteration in original) (quoting Wyzykowski v. Rizas, 132 N.J. 509, 523 (1993)).

Trustees of First Presbyterian Church v. Alling

54 N.J. Super. 141 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 13, 1959

Minutes of board meetings indicate that in 1887 the board of trustees of plaintiff church passed a resolution forbidding any further interments in this cemetery. … In the case of Newark v. Stockton, 44 N.J.

Faber v. Borough of Hawthorne

365 N.J. Super. 54 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 29, 2003

See City Council, Orange v. Brown, 249 N.J.Super. 185, 191-92 , 592 A.2d 260 (App.Div.1991). … A mayor is not disem-powered from acting to achieve a permissible goal generally within his prerogatives because he did not act with the formal concurrence of another officer who is subordinate to him. *58 Hutt v.

State v. Hatterer

75 N.J. Super. 400 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1962

However, it provides that "[i]n case of any flagrant misconduct the board of managers may declare a forfeiture of the time previously remitted, either in whole or in part, as to them shall seem just." … Zink v. Lear, 28 N.J. Super. 515 ( App. Div. 1953). As for defendant's claim that he was not arraigned before a magistrate, State v.

C.H. VS. STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN(COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 23, 2017

As these provisions demonstrate, our legislature has granted school boards the duty to determine teacher fitness, in order to protect students from harm. Gish v. … Similarly, an agency's review of a school board decision is entitled to "a presumption of correctness" and will not be disturbed unless arbitrary and unreasonable. Thomas v.

Haggerty v. Cedeno

279 N.J. Super. 607 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 1995

Doran v. Thomsen, 76 N.J.L. 754 (E & A 1908); Mauren v. Brown, 106 N.J.L. 284 (Sup.Ct. 1930); see Harvey v. Craw, 110 N.J. Super. 68 , 264 A. 2d 448 (App.Div. 1970). The New York rule is different. … Co. v.

Lobna Elberri v. Crosspointe Condo Association

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 2, 2025

. _____________________________ Submitted September 10, 2025 – Decided October 2, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and DeAlmeida. … Section 11.04 specified that if insurance proceeds derived from property loss exceeded $25,000, the Board of Trustees (Board) of the Association shall enter into a contract with a licensed contractor for the repair or rebuilding