Case law

Bencivenga v. JJAMM, INC.

258 N.J. Super. 399 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 14, 1992

This result is supported by our holding in Ramos v. Browning Ferris Ind. of So. Jersey, Inc., 194 N.J. Super. 96 , 476 A. 2d 304 (App.Div. 1984), rev'd on other grounds, 103 N.J. 177 , 510 A. 2d 1152 (1986). … See Ramos v. Browning Ferris Ind. of So. Jersey, Inc., supra, 194 N.J. Super. at 107 , 476 A. 2d 304 .

O'CONNELL v. State

335 N.J. Super. 427 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 11, 2000

This is so because "payment for board, medical services, and nursing in such case [goes] to the general fund to maintain the charity." Id. at 65 , 127 A. 340 . … State v.

Rios v. Szivos

354 N.J. Super. 578 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 6, 2002

We conclude, as did the Law Division in Rogozinski v. … See, e.g., State v.

Valonis v. Mayor of Cinnaminson

54 N.J. Super. 567 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 1959

Fischer v. Twp. of Bedminster, 5 N. J. 534, 542 (1950). The two exceptions outlined in Ward v. Keenan, supra, were not intended to be exclusive, (Nolan v. Fitzpatrick, 9 N. … In this connection see Nolan v. Fitzpatrick, supra; Swede case, supra; Sullivan v. Roe, 18 N. J. 156, 161 (1955); Deaney v. Linen Thread Co., 19 N. J. 578, 581 (1955).

Goughan v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co.

238 N.J. Super. 644 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1989

Thus, in Liguori v. Allstate Ins. Co., 76 N.J. … [at 212, 184 A. 2d 12 ] See also Clarke v. Brown, 101 N.J. Super. 404 , 244 A. 2d 514 (Law Div. 1968).

In the Matter of the Suspension or Revocation of the License of Kieran Slevin, M.D., Etc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 2, 2026

Ibid.; see also Newmark-Shortino v. Buna, 427 N.J. Super. 285, 311 (App. Div. 2012). The standard for medical recordkeeping is set forth in the Board's regulations. See N.J.A.C. 13:53-6.5. … See Zimmerman v. Diviney, 477 N.J. Super. 1, 21 (App.

Formal Complaint of Public Service Coordinated Transport v. Super Service Bus Co.

82 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1964

The Board of Public Utility Commissioners (hereafter P.U.C.) ordered Super Service Bus Co. … Board of Public Utility Commrs., 107 N. J. L. 41, 43 (Sup. Ct. 1930), aff’d 108 N. J. L. 258 (E. & A. 1931).

State v. Baechlor

52 N.J. Super. 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 31, 1958

The deputy attorney-general claimed surprise and called Brown to the stand." … V.

Unsatisfied Cl. & Judg. Fd. Bd. v. Concord Ins.

110 N.J. Super. 191 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 14, 1970

Super. 191 (1970) 264 A.2d 757 UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, PLAINTIFF, v. CONCORD INSURANCE CO., LENOX FINANCE CO., ETHEL ODERMAN AND CALVIN JOYNER, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. … See Curley v. Curley, 37 N.J. Super. 351 (App. Div. 1955); Hintenberger v. Garfield, 49 N.J. Super. 175 (Law Div. 1958) aff'd 52 N.J. Super. 526 (App. Div. 1958). It is noteworthy that in LeFelt v. Nasarow, 71 N.J.

State v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.

222 N.J. Super. 343 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 20, 1988

Bobsein ( Brown & Brown; Furst and Waldman, attorneys, Henry F. Furst, of counsel). Paulette L. Pitt argued the cause for respondent, David R. Ellis ( Hayden & Perle, attorneys. Joseph A. Hayden, Jr., of counsel). … In State v.

Keifhaber v. Yannelli

9 N.J. Super. 139 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 30, 1950

is stated in the contract for the sale of land: "The parties agree that Henry Kiefhaber and Arthur Malgieri brought about this sale and the seller agrees to pay the commission at the rates established or adopted by the Board … Dolan v. Rodgers, 44 N.E. 167 ( N.Y. 1896); Vandegrift v. Cowles Engineering Co., 55 N.E. 941 ( N.Y. 1900); Restatement, Contracts, § 295. In Stern v.

Fantasia v. Hess Oil and Chemical Corp.

110 N.J. Super. 360 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 14, 1970

See Binet v. Ocean Gate Board of Education, 90 N.J. Super. 571 (App. Div. 1966). … In support of this argument petitioner cites Crotty v. Driver Harris Company, 49 N.J. Super. 60 (App. Div. 1958); Piazza v. Prince's Farms, 86 N.J. Super. 100 (App. Div. 1965); Martin v. J.

BLUE WATER TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION, INC. VS. LORI DIFABIO (L-0120-15, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 2019

Lee v. Brown, 232 N.J. 114, 126 (2018). "Summary judgment is appropriate 'when no genuine issue of material fact is at issue and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'" Ibid. … [Seidman v. Clifton Sav. Bank, 205 N.J. 150, 175 (2011) (quoting Green Party v.

Lands v. Baseman

200 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 16, 1985

clients in fee arbitration cases and witnesses in both ethics and fee matters shall be absolutely immune from suit, whether legal or equitable in nature, for all communications to Committees, Fee Committees, the Director, the Board … Kotlikoff v. The Community News, 89 N.J. 62, 67 (1982); Molnar v. Star-Ledger, 193 N.J.Super. 12, 22 (App.Div.1984). The order for summary judgment is affirmed.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HOPETON B. BROWN, JR. (10-11-1702, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 2020

See State v. Brown, No. A-2466-13 (App. Div. Aug. 1, 2017). Brown contends that both his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective. … As Brown has requested, we remand for an evidentiary hearing on that claim. See State v.

Denis v. City of Newark

307 N.J. Super. 304 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 1998

See Costa v. Josey 83 N.J. 49, 55 , 415 A.2d 337 (1980); see also Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 577 , 432 A.2d 493 (1981); Perona v. Township of Mullica, 270 N.J.Super. 19, 29 , 636 A.2d 535 (App.Div.1994); Pacifico v. … See Brooks v. Odom, 150 N.J. 395, 402-03 , 696 A.2d 619 (1997); see also Collins v.

Nebel v. Nebel

99 N.J. Super. 256 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1968

Streitwolf v. Streitwolf, 58 N.J. Eq. 570 ( E. & A. 1899); Rufner v. Rufner, 131 N.J. Eq. 193 ( E. & A. 1941); Jonitz v. Jonitz, 25 N.J. Super. 544 ( App. Div. 1953). Cf. Foote v. … . & A. 1921), wherein the court mentioned the father's limited income as one of the reasons for not requiring him to pay the expenses of his son *260 at a boarding high school. But Cf. Werner v. Werner, 7 N.J.

Conover v. Packanack Lake Country Club

94 N.J. Super. 275 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1967

Defendants-class representatives were selected as such by the court from among all the lot owners interested, because they were members of the elected board of governors and board of directors of the Association. … The case closest in point is Hansberry v.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION FOR ATLANTIC COUNTY FREEHOLDER DISTRICT 3 (L-3929-20, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 2021

Marczyk tried the matter on facts set forth in a six-page stipulation filed by the parties whose relevant portions are as follows: 1 The position of the Board of Chosen Freeholders has become the Board of County Commissioners … Gray-Sadler, 164 N.J. at 482 (quoting Wene v. Meyner, 13 N.J. 185, 196 (1953)).

Milgram v. ORBITZ WORLDWIDE, INC.

419 N.J. Super. 305 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 26, 2010

The prototypical service qualifying for this statutory immunity is an online messaging board (or bulletin *1120 board) on which Internet subscribers post comments and respond to comments posted by others. See Zeran v. … See Jurin v.