Case law

TRADEWINDS MARINA, INC. VS. BOROUGH OF SOUTH TOMS RIVER, (L-3670-14, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 2017

Neumann & Co. v. City of Hoboken, 437 N.J. Super. 384, 391 (App. Div. 2014) (quoting Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. Bd. of Adj. for Chatham Twp., 202 N.J. Super. 312, 321 (App. Div. 1985)). … V. Plaintiff also argues that the Planning Board and Council's actions are not supported by sufficient credible evidence. Again, we disagree.

Murray v. Comcast Corp.

457 N.J. Super. 464 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 2019

Id. at 312 , 181 A.3d 279 (quoting GMAC v. Pittella , 205 N.J. 572 , 587, 17 A.3d 177 (2011) ). … Lee v. Brown , 232 N.J. 114 , 126, 178 A.3d 701 (2018) (emphasis added) (citing R. 4:49-2).

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JESUS M. HERRERA (18-08-0668, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 3, 2022

In State v. … Brown, A-2021-20 10 138 N.J. 481, 561 (1994), overruled on other grounds by State v.

KINLEY PHYSICAL THERAPY v. Kramer

256 N.J. Super. 355 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 2, 1992

See Benson v. Coca Cola, 120 N.J. Super. 60 , 293 A. 2d 395 (1972); De Asio v. Bayonne, 62 N.J. Super. 232 , 162 A. 2d 596 (1960). … This issue was previously discussed in Smith v. Stephenson, 641 S.W. 2d 900 (Tex. 1982).

In Re Public Service Electric and Gas Co.

18 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 1952

Whereupon, the board of assessors made assessments for benefits against the abutting property owners. … State, Kellogg, pros., v. Elizabeth, 40 N.J.L. 274, 276 ( Sup. Ct. 1878); Barkman v. Hackensack, 114 N.J.L. 506 ( Sup. Ct. 1935); Beazley v. Twp. of Moorestown, supra ; Gaylord v.

DYNASTY BLDG. v. Upper Saddle River

267 N.J. Super. 611 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 1993

Super. 611 (1993) 632 A.2d 544 DYNASTY BUILDING CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. … See Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount Laurel (Mt. Laurel II), supra, 92 N.J. at 208 , 456 A. 2d 390 ; Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v.

Trentacost v. City of Passaic

327 N.J. Super. 320 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 2000

See Curtis v. Finneran, 83 N.J. 563, 569-70 , 417 A.2d 15 (1980); Pappas v. Board of Adjustment of Leonia, 254 N.J.Super. 52, 61 , 603 A.2d 65 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 130 N.J. 9 , 611 A.2d 648 (1992). … See Eagan v. Boyarsky, 158 N.J. 632, 635 , 731 A.2d 28 (1999); Kennedy v. Westinghouse Elec.

State v. Miller

273 N.J. Super. 192 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 19, 1994

State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 593 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979). Nevertheless, other attendant circumstances or statements of the defendant may permit such an inference to be drawn when considered together with his presence. … See State v. Whyte, 265 N.J. Super. 518 , 628 A. 2d 340 (App.Div. 1992), aff'd o.b., 133 N.J. 481 , 628 A. 2d 287 (1993). *197 The fact that the drugs here were partially concealed is of no great significance. State v.

Evangel Baptist Church v. Chambers

96 N.J. Super. 367 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 21, 1967

Reynoldson v. Perkins, Amb. 564; Giffard v. Hort, 1 Schoales & L. 386, 407; Lloyd v. Johnes, 9 Ves. 37; Mead v. Mitchell, 17 N.Y. 210 ; Calv. Parties 48 et seq.; Mitf. & T. Pl. & Pr. 24; 1 Daniell Ch. Prac. 262. … Woolsey v. Woolsey, 78 N.J. Eq. 517, 525 ( Prerog. 1910) aff'd 78 N.J. Eq. 579 ( E. & A. 1911), may also be referred to. Both that case and Dunham v. Doremus were cited with *370 approval in Brown v.

County of Hudson v. State

328 N.J. Super. 308 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 10, 2000

V, § 4, H 6. … V, § 4, 116, should receive paramount deference. In County of Monmouth v.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of S.W.H.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 2026

Brown v. Brown, 348 N.J. Super. 466, 478 (App. Div. 2002) (citing Carey v. Lovett, 132 N.J. 44, 64 (1993)). See also R.F., 217 N.J. … See D.C., 146 N.J. at 58-59 (citing State v.

Pusillo v. Czajkowski

25 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 23, 1953

Brown, attorney for defendants. EWART, J.S.C. … O'Neill v. Vreeland, supra .

Quinn v. Quinn

118 N.J. Super. 413 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 6, 1972

Foy v. Dayco, 82 N.J. Super. 8 ( App. Div. 1964); Board of Education, Hackensack v. Hackensack, 63 N.J. Super. 560 ( App. Div. 1960). … X v. Y, 103 N.J. Super. 218 (Ch. Div. 1968); Wells v. Wells, 41 N.J. 594 (1964); Shore v. Shore, 11 N.J. 23 (1953); Strong v. Strong, 138 N.J. Eq. 302 (E. & A. 1946); 10 N.J.

State v. Pessolano

343 N.J. Super. 464 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 2001

Defendant relies primarily on State v. … [(Emphasis added).] [9] See, e.g., State v.

Abeles v. Adams Engineering Co., Inc.

64 N.J. Super. 167 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 1960

Clement v. Young-McShea Amusement Co., 70 N.J. Eq. 677 ( E. & A. 1905); Hill Dredging Corp. v. Risley, 18 N.J. 501 (1955). The board of directors must authorize or ratify the act of its director or officer. … In so doing, they must be lawfully assembled and must act as a board. Moffatt v. Niemitz, 102 N.J. Eq. 112 ( Ch. 1928); Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co., 80 N.J. Eq. 122 ( Ch. 1912).

Gelsmine v. Vignale

11 N.J. Super. 481 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1951

. & A. 1934), and Lombardo v. … Lindeman-Chevrolet, Inc., v. Reliable Woodworking Co., 4 N.J. Misc. 52 ( Sup. Ct. 1926); affirmed, 103 N.J.L. 198 ( E. & A. 1926); see Brown v. City of Cambridge, 3 Allen 474 ( Mass. 1862); Aljian v.

Butler v. PPG Industries, Inc.

201 N.J. Super. 558 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 1985

See Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp., 60 N.J. 402, 410 (1972); see also Johnson v. Salem Corp., 97 N.J. 78, 94 (1984); Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chem. Corp., 91 N.J. 386, 397 (1982); Finnegan v. … Brown v. United States Stove Co., 98 N.J. 155, 171 (1984). In order to exculpate itself, the manufacturer must prove an intervening superseding cause or perhaps some other sole proximate cause of the injury. Ibid.

In Re Guardianship of BCH

108 N.J. Super. 531 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 17, 1970

See Jersey City v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 133 N.J.L. 202, 210 (Sup. Ct. 1945), modified on other grounds. Jersey City v. Kelly, 134 N.J.L. 239, 240 , (E. & A. 1946). … Harvey v. Essex County Board of Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 391-393 (1959); In re Munson-Lied Co., 68 N.J. Super. 281, 287-288 (App.

State v. Seymour

98 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1968

The State Parole Board then reverted defendant to serve the balance of time he still owed on the 5-year commitment for violation of probation. N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.24. … Mempa v.

State v. Santana

215 N.J. Super. 63 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 14, 1987

See United States v. … State v. Pierce, supra .