Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.98s

  • Gruber & Colabella, PA v. Erickson

    345 N.J. Super. 248 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 14, 2001

    Brown, 338 N.J.Super. 276, 281 , 768 A. 2d 822 (App.Div.2001).] … As noted in Lustig v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Ho-Ho-Kus v. Menduno

    91 N.J. Super. 482 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 1966

    (Italics ours) See Kearins v. Ziegener, 135 N.J.L. 119, 120 ( Sup. Ct. 1947). … N.J.S.A. 40:47-6 lays down in clear terms the guidelines for a hearing before the appropriate municipal board or authority, on specific written charges.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Trimarco v. Trimarco

    396 N.J. Super. 207 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 2007

    See also Silverstein v. … In Fletcher v. A.J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Klein v. UMDNJ

    377 N.J. Super. 28 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 2005

    See Young v. … In Hancock v.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Matter of Clark

    216 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 2, 1987

    Mulderig, respondent, argued the cause pro se ( Brown & Connery, attorneys). Jon C. … See State v. Rush, 46 N.J. 399, 412-413 (1966); State in re Steenback, 34 N.J. 89, 103-104 (1961); Crist v. New Jersey Div. of Youth & Family Services, 135 N.J. Super. 573 (App.Div. 1975).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 40:55D-19 FOR A DETERMINATION THAT THE MONTVILLE-WHIPPANY 230KV TRANSMISSION PROJECT IS REASONABLY NECESSARY FOR THE SERVICE, CONVENIENCE OR WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC (NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 2019

    (quoting Charlie Brown of Chatham v. Bd. of Adjustment, 202 N.J. Super. 312, 327 (App. Div. 1985)). … O'Brien v. Telcordia Techs., Inc., 420 N.J. Super. 256, 269 (App. Div. 2011) (quoting Zirger v. Gen. Accident Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cranberry Lake Quarry Co. v. Johnson

    95 N.J. Super. 495 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1967

    Scott, 11 N.J. 117 (1952); Andrews v. Ocean Tp. Board of Adjustment, 30 N.J. 245 (1959); Schmidt v. … Zullo v. Board of Health, Woodbridge Tp., 9 N.J. 431, 441 (1952). We think the ordinance passes this test, and, stripped of its invalid parts, should stand.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Jon Harvey Personnel of Nassau, Inc. v. Casio, Inc.

    149 N.J. Super. 102 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 4, 1977

    Williams v. Farmers and Merchants Ins. Co., 457 F. 2d 37 (8 Cir. 1972); Lehman v. Bair, 85 Idaho 59 , 375 P. 2d 714 (1962). Compare Affron Fuel Oil v. Firemen’s Ins. Co. of Newark, 143 F. Supp. 38 (S. D. N. … Y. 1955), with Ward v. Brown, 301 F. 2d 445 (10 Cir. 1962). Cf. Hollembaek v. Alaska Rural Rehab. Corp., 447 P. 2d 67 (Alaska Sup. Ct. 1968); Associated Metals Corp. v. Dixon, 52 N. J. Super. 143 (Ch.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pfeuffer v. Sculco

    242 N.J. Super. 181 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 28, 1990

    As construction proceeded, plaintiffs observed that Sculco was building a different structure than that shown on the sketch presented to the board of adjustment. … State v. Gill, 47 N.J. 441, 444 , 221 A.2d 521 (1966); State v. Gelok, 237 N.J.Super. 503, 506 , 568 A.2d 541 (App.Div.1989).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fischer v. Fischer

    375 N.J. Super. 278 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 22, 2005

    Corp. v. Amgen, Inc., 882 F.2d 806, 812 (3rd Cir.1989); Central Jersey Freightliner, Inc. v. Freightliner Corp., 987 F.Supp. 289, 295 (D.N.J.1997); Davenport v. … Feinberg and long-time Supreme Court Family Practice Committee member and then-Chair of the Supreme Court Disciplinary Review Board, Lee R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. Garden State Farms, Inc.

    76 N.J. Super. 189 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 23, 1962

    In State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N.J. Eq. 504 ( E. & A. 1935), injunctive relief was granted to prevent violation of the earlier Milk Control Act. … State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., supra . Defendants urge that there is no longer a need to maintain price controls over milk because the emergency upon which the legislation was predicated has terminated.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • HP Higgs Co., Inc. v. Madison

    184 N.J. Super. 355 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 27, 1982

    Transport v. … See Newark v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Slocum v. Krupy

    11 N.J. Super. 81 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1951

    SLOCUM, DIRECTOR OF UNION COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN KRUPY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 11, 1950. … See Giordano v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re N.J.A.C.

    450 N.J. Super. 152 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2017

    In particular, Silver noted, id. at 50 , 61 A.3d 958 , that in Demech v. Board of Review, 167 N.J.Super. 35 , 400 A.2d 502 (App. … Silver next addressed our opinion in Smith v. Board of Review, 281 N.J.Super. 426 , 658 A.2d 310 (App.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Kenny

    128 N.J. Super. 94 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 1974

    And the money was for the Board of Freeholders under your direction, and you got the Board of Freeholders to do something which it otherwise wouldn't have done? A. I asked him to do it. Q. It was a bribe? A. Yes. … State v. Farrell, 61 N.J. 99, 104 (1972); State v. West, 29 N.J. 327, 338 (1959); State v. Sullivan, 24 N.J. 18, 36 (1957); *111 State v. Hipplewith, supra .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Peloso v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.

    102 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1968

    Brown, 381 S.W. 2 d 573 ( Ct. of App. Tenn., *364 1964), certiorari denied by the Tennessee Supreme Court. (See 381 S.W. 2 d 573.) … The loss was never so ascertained and it follows that the right of action did not accrue until the denial of liability by letter to Elsie Brown."

    Reversed on other grounds by Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., 56 N.J. 514 (1970)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Princeton South Investors, LLC v. First American Title Insurance Insurance Company

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 8, 2014

    After completing the preparation of the municipal tax assessment list, the assessor files the list with the County Board of Taxation (Board), which may examine, revise and correct the proposed assessments … Stores Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Park Place East Condominium Ass'n v. Hovbilt, Inc.

    279 N.J. Super. 319 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 8, 1994

    of a lien, the Board may add to the aforesaid assessments or charges a sum or sums of twenty (20%) percent of the gross amount due, as counsel fees____ The legislative scheme for collection of assessments for maintenance … Coleman v. Fiore Bros., 113 N.J. 594 , 552 A.2d 141 (1989). Island House Condo v. Feldman, 245 N.J.Super. 407 , 585 A.2d 982 (Ch.Div.1990).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Matter of Estate of Hersh

    195 N.J. Super. 74 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1984

    See Marotta v. Burgio, 185 N.J. Super. 172, 175-176 (Law Div. 1982). … See Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 556 (1976).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re Buckelew

    128 N.J. Eq. 81 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1940

    Tuttle v. Gilmore, 36 N.J. Eq. 617 ; Wild v. Brown, 120 N.J. Eq. 31 ; 183 Atl. Rep. 899 ; In re Ward's Estate, 121 N.J. Eq. 555 ; 192 Atl. Rep. 68 ; affirmed, 121 N.J. Eq. 606 ; 191 Atl. Rep. 772 ; Gilbert v. … Wild v. Brown, supra; Babbitt v. Fidelity Trust Co., 72 N.J. Eq. 745 ; 66 Atl. Rep. 1076 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.