Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.95s
201 N.J. Super. 608 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 21, 1985
Officer Michael Brown of the Millville Police Department testified that he wrote a summons following the accident. … Ochs v. Federal Insurance Co., 90 N.J. 108 (1982); State v. Zarinsky, 143 N.J. Super. 35 (App.Div. 1976), aff'd. 75 N.J. 101 (1977). N.J.S.A. 39:5-3 has a similar effect.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHome News Pub. v. Dept. of Health
239 N.J. Super. 172 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1990
McClain v. College Hosp., 99 N.J. 346, 354 , 492 A. 2d 991 (1985). … Techniscan v. Passaic Valley Water, 113 N.J. 233, 236 , 549 A. 2d 1249 (1988).
Cited 4 timesPublishedHOME BLDRS. LEAGUE, ETC. v. Evesham Tp.
182 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 1981
As part of the process of constructing and selling homes, members of plaintiff corporation must apply for and receive subdivision and site plan approvals from defendant's planning board. … The rights of way for the streets are dedicated to the township at the time the plat, as approved by the township planning board, is filed.
Cited 1 timesPublished287 N.J. Super. 76 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 12, 1996
The suspect is next seen at 7:18 p.m. boarding a Harbor Tower elevator. … Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 231-32 , 93 S.Ct. 1565, 1570 , 36 L.Ed. 2d 208, 215 (1973); Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 135 , 88 S.Ct. 1620, 1627 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 476, 484 (1968) (quoting Lutwak v.
Cited 40 timesPublished157 N.J. Super. 242 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 10, 1978
State v. Celmer, 143 N.J. Super. 371, 377 (Cty. Ct. 1976). … Accordingly, for the reasons fully set forth in the majority opinion in Schaad v.
Reversed on other grounds by State v. Celmer, 80 N.J. 405 (1979)Cited 6 timesPublished58 N.J. Super. 155 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 1959
See Bertola v. Board of Education, 1 A.D. 2 d 973, 150 N.Y.S. 2 d 831 ( App. Div. 1956). … Board of Education, 300 N.Y. 306 , 90 N.E. 2 d 474 ( Ct. App. 1949), rehearing denied 301 N.Y. 662 , 93 N.E. 2 d 927 ( Ct. App. 1949), or for purposes foreign to teaching duties, Guyten v.
Cited 12 timesPublished150 N.J. Super. 180 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1977
Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 , 92 S.Ct. 2174 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 1 (1972); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 284 (1969); Chapman v. … As indicated in Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCostantino v. NJ MERIT SYSTEM BD.
313 N.J. Super. 212 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1998
Super. 212 Frank COSTANTINO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MERIT SYSTEM BOARD and Division of Motor Vehicles, New Jersey Department of Transportation, Respondents-Respondents. … finding relied on by the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished13 N.J. Super. 510 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 26, 1951
The indictment there was based on R.S. 19:34-25b, which denounces the giving of money to any member of a district board of election "because of his membership on such board." … See State v. Smith, 89 N.J.L. 52 ( Sup. Ct. 1916); State v. Faure, 98 N.J.L. 18 ( Sup. Ct. 1922); State v. Rappise, 3 N.J. Super. 30 ( App. Div. 1949).
Cited 5 timesPublished77 N.J. Super. 443 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 14, 1962
BROWN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned). … See Hollander v. Smith & Smith, 10 N.J. Super. 82 ( App. Div. 1950), certification denied 6 N.J. 399 (1951). The area was explored in Poppino v. Jones Store Co., 1 F.R.D. 215 ( D. Mo. 1940).
Cited 1 timesPublished271 N.J. Super. 254 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1994
See, e.g., State v. Green, 86 N.J. 281 , 430 A.2d 914 (1981). … State v. Vick, 117 N.J. 288, 289 , 566 A.2d 531 (1989).
Cited 1 timesPublishedGotthelf Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Local No. 222
93 N.J. Super. 263 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 1966
In connection with the underlying controversy plaintiff and the union had filed charges of unfair labor practices against each other with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). … First, the remedies before the Labor Board and in the court were not inconsistent. Levy v. Massachusetts Accident Co., 127 N.J. Eq. 49 ( E. & A. 1940).
Cited 2 timesPublished165 N.J. Super. 186 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1979
Relying on the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Philpott v. Essex Cty. Welfare Bd., 409 U. S. 413 , 93 S. Ct. 590 , 34 L. … Once the Welfare Board achieved creditor status, they had the same limitations placed on them as other creditors.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEiszner v. Director, Division of Taxation
19 N.J. Tax 498 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 19, 2001
Eiszner v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 18 N.J.Tax 579, 593-98 (TaxCt.2000). … According' to the Plan’s terms, the CPC board of directors was under no obligation to make the 1992 Plan Payment, and the 1992 Plan Payment would not have been paid to the Estate absent board action. 9.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTp. of West Orange v. 769 Associates, LLC.
397 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 2007
Relying on Englewood v. … Relying on Kean v. Union County Park Commission, 130 N.J.
Cited 3 timesPublished83 N.J. Super. 317 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 1964
Village of Westlake v. Elrick, 83 N.E. 2 d 646, 647 ( Ohio Ct. App. 1948); Auditorium, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, etc., of Wilmington, 8 Terry 373 , 47 Del. 373 , 91 A. 2 d 528 ( Sup. Ct. 1952). … Auditorium, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, etc., of Wilmington , above, where the Delaware Supreme Court flatly rejected the use of extrinsic evidence to ascertain zone district boundaries.
Cited 3 timesPublished11 N.J. Super. 576 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 9, 1951
His case does not come within the principle of State v. Lutz, 135 N.J.L. 603 ( Sup. Ct. 1947). No right exists to a hearing on revocation of a license to be at large as involved in this case. R.S. 2:198-4, supra. … He is not entitled to immediate release and is required to complete service of such maximum term, unless sooner paroled by the New Jersey State Parole Board.
Cited 3 timesPublished81 N.J. Super. 64 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 28, 1963
Cited 1 timesPublishedLima & Sons, Inc. v. Borough of Ramsey
269 N.J. Super. 469 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1994
Moreover, we note that no appeal was taken from the Planning Board's decision. On these facts, we find that considerations of due process were satisfied. … Additionally, plaintiff had an opportunity to be heard at the Ramsey Planning Board public hearings considering its site plan application.
Cited 8 timesPublished187 N.J. Super. 25 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 1982
Brief, a graduate of Harvard Medical School, who received his surgical training at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital and was board-certified in general surgery, testified. … Howard Kortis, a board-certified anesthesiologist, also testified.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna