Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.39s
147 N.J. Super. 575 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 1977
(Beckley v. Reclamation Board,, 48 Cal.2d 710, 716-718 [4], 312 P.2d 1098 ; Brill v. Fox, 211 Cal. 739, 743-744 [3], 297 P. 25 ; Waite v. Southern Pacific Co., 192 Cal. 467, 470 [2], 221 P. 204 ; Gore v. Witt, 149 Cal. … Rptr. at 669 , 423 P. 2d at 821 ] See also Tammen v. County of San Diego, 66 Cal. 2d 468 , 58 Cal. Rptr. 249 , 426 P. 2d 753 (Sup. Ct. 1967); Flores v. Board of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles, 13 Cal.
Cited 34 timesPublished129 N.J. Super. 286 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 1974
As a result the Stockholds brought an action for injunctive relief and damages, in which the County of Ocean, its planning board, and Scarborough are defendants. … Newark v. Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 54 N.J. 171, 187 , cert. den. 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969), Whelan v. N.J. Power & Light Co., 45 N.J. 237, 253 (1965); Roe v.
Reversed on other grounds by County of Ocean v. Stockhold, 67 N.J. 104 (1974)Cited 3 timesPublished304 N.J. Super. 421 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 25, 1997
Theresa Casagrande serves as a member and chairperson of the school board for the Borough of Spring Lake Heights. She was elected to a three year term in April 1995. She is in the final year of her term. … Regardless of the difference in timing when the municipal and school board elections are held, the statutory mandate may have the effect of prohibiting the one and not the other.
Cited 7 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 2014
See Schack v. … to the board.
Cited 0 timesPublished408 N.J. Super. 388 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 2009
State v. … State v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCOLUMBIA FRUIT FARMS, INC. VS. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 13, 2021
The cited individual or entity may contest the violation by filing a written application with the Construction Board of Appeals (Board) within fifteen days of receiving the 2 N.J.A.C. 5:23-6.31(a)(1), also known … Here, the eighteen cited appellants had an administrative remedy; they each could have filed a written application for a hearing before the Construction Board of Appeals (Board) within fifteen days of receiving the notice
Cited 0 timesPublishedSTATE, BD. OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMM'RS v. East Shores, Inc.
154 N.J. Super. 57 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 25, 1977
Super. 57 (1977) 380 A.2d 1168 STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PLAINTIFFS, v. EAST SHORES, INC., DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. … ." *65 In Jones v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedFalcone v. Middlesex Co. Med. Soc.
82 N.J. Super. 133 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 1964
FALCONE, PLAINTIFF, v. … Whatever may be the holding in the Aldrich case, this court is of the opinion that the philosophy of Ajamian v. Schlanger , Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., and Wangler v.
Cited 3 timesPublished34 N.J. Super. 103 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1955
Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes, etc., 101 N.J.L. 371, 373 ( E. & A. 1925), where the court held that a rental paid by a subtenant of an amusement park should not be used as a basis for an assessment; Schetty v. … Borough of Hasbrouck Heights v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 125 N.J.L. 617 ( Sup. Ct. 1941); City Holding Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N.J.L. 168 ( Sup. Ct. 1941); Prudential Ins., etc., v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGOODWILL HOME v. Garwood Borough
281 N.J. Super. 596 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 14, 1995
The Union County Board of Taxation affirmed. The Tax Court affirmed the Board of Taxation. We reverse. … In Larson v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedQBE Ins. Co. v. P & F CONTAINER
362 N.J. Super. 445 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 30, 2003
P & F is a motor carrier registered with the Surface Transportation Board (the Board) of the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) for transportation of property. [1] See 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 13901 , 13902. … Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBorough of Franklin Lakes v. Mutzberg
226 N.J. Super. 46 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 1988
It would not give rise to an independent cause of action based thereon, see Braitman v. Overlook Terrace Corp., 68 N.J. 368, 385 (1975); Horbal v. McNeil, 66 N.J. 99, 103 (1974); Michaels v. … Property Tax Law requires that the tax list for each municipality in the county once certified by the county board of taxation is to remain in the office of the board as a public record.
Cited 0 timesPublished232 N.J. Super. 34 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1989
They conducted a de novo review based on the record supplied by the Rent Control Board. … See Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Pierce, supra, 716 F. 2d at 180 ; Hall *41 v. Board of School Comm'rs, 707 F. 2d 464, 465 (11th Cir.1983); Lenard v. Argento, 699 F. 2d 874, 899-900 (7th Cir.1983); Cohen v.
Cited 13 timesPublished327 N.J. Super. 458 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 2000
Brown, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief). Ivelisse Torres, Public Defender,for defendant-respondent (Susan Green, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, on the brief). Before Judges KEEFE, A.A. RODRÍGUEZ and LINTNER. … Const. amend V; N.J. Cons. art. I, ¶ 11. See State v. Roth, 95 N.J. 334, 344-45 , 471 A. 2d 370 (1984).
Cited 15 timesPublishedBor. of Roselle v. Santone Const. Co., Inc.
119 N.J. Super. 314 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1972
The municipal court adjudged defendant-builder guilty of violating an ordinance of the Borough of Roselle which required use of plaster or plaster board on all partitions and interior walls except basements and cellars. … It is at least doubtful whether such rights exist in the light of State v. Lanish, 103 N.J. Super. 441 (1968), aff'd o.b. 54 N.J. 93 (1969). Affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNJ CABINET & MILL CO. INC. v. Creedon
24 N.J. Super. 553 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1953
Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 Supreme Court 384, 390, 93 L.Ed. 266, 279 (1949). To the same effect see Wilford v. Eisner Co., supra, Hogan v. Hodge, supra ; Tsibikas v. Morrof, 12 N.J. … Welsh v. Board of Education of Tewksbury Tp., 7 N.J. Super. 141 , 72 A. 2 d 350 ( App. Div. 1950). Indeed in Wilford v.
Cited 2 timesPublished154 N.J. Super. 169 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 1977
State v. Brown, 132 N. J. Super. 180, 185 (App. Div. 1975). Furthermore, the briefing requirements of R. *173 3:5-7(b) differ materially from the general briefing provision established by R. 1:6-5(a). … Burg v. State, 147 N. J. Super. 316, 324 (App. Div.), certif. den. 75 N. J. 11 (1977) ; State by Highway Comm’r v. Dilley, 48 N. J. 383, 387 (1967).
Cited 8 timesPublishedLAURA LETTIS-YILMAZ v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 23, 2022
Skulski v. Nolan, 68 N.J. 179, 205-06 (1975). … Luchejko v. City of Hoboken, 207 N.J. 191, 208 (2011).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished203 N.J. Super. 144 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 1985
Protect. v. … To the extent that Theobald v.
Cited 4 timesPublished205 N.J. Super. 208 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 7, 1985
See State v. Lynch, 79 N.J. 327, 340 (1979). … State v. Gibson, 68 N.J. 499, 513 (1975); State v. Saperstein, 202 N.J.Super. 478, 483 (App.Div.1985).
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna