Case law

Y.A.H. INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN VS. MT. CARMEL LAND COMPANY, LLC (F-006828-18, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 19, 2020

PROFIT SHARING PLAN and OAK LEAF FINANCIAL, LLC., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. MT. CARMEL LAND COMPANY, LLC, LAND DIMENSION ENGINEERING, DAVID L. … Brown argued the cause for respondents (Dembo, Brown & Burns, LLP, attorneys; Michael E. Brown, of counsel and on the brief).

King v. New Jersey Racing Commission

205 N.J. Super. 411 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 22, 1985

See also, as to Points II, III and IV, DeVitis v. New Jersey Racing Com’n., 202 N.J.Super. 484 (App.Div.1985). As to Point V, the reliance upon Pitts v. N.J. … Aurentz v. Planning Board of Tp. of Little Egg Harbor, 171 N.J.Super. 135, 141 (Law Div.1979).

NJ Bell Tel. Co. v. West Orange

188 N.J. Super. 455 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1982

Our Supreme Court recently held in City of Plainfield v. … Welfare Bd. v. New Jersey Bell Tel. Co., 126 N.J. Super. 417, 421 (App.Div. 1974).

State v. Bottigliero

174 N.J. Super. 101 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 1980

See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed. 2d 935 (1974), Monks v. N.J. Parole Board, 58 N.J. 238 (1971), and Beckworth v. N.J. … Parole Board, 62 N.J. 348 (1973), involving rights on parole release hearings, and Avant v. Clifford, 67 N.J. 496, at 530-531 , ftnt. 27 (1975), involving disciplinary prison hearings.

In Re EMB

348 N.J. Super. 31 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 13, 2002

Do what the board asks. Is that so hard? … More recently, in S.R. v.

DeCOSMO v. Foreman

67 N.J. Super. 548 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 1961

Ertag v. Haines, supra ; Board of Education, Township of Woodbridge v. Kane Acoustical Co., Inc., 51 N.J. Super. 319, 329 ( App. Div. 1958); Schnitzer and Wildstein, New Jersey Rules Service, A-IV, p. 886. … Board of Education, Township of Woodbridge v. Kane Acoustical Co., supra, 51 N.J. Super., at pp. 329, 330.

Daddetto v. Barbiera

4 N.J. Super. 479 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 3, 1949

As she was leaving the store, she stepped on the platform leading from the door to the side-walk; a board collapsed and she fell through the floor, causing her injury. … Trondle v. Ward, 129 N.J.L. 179 ( E.

Jp v. Dmahs

392 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 2007

Super. 295 J.P., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent, and Middlesex County Board of Social Services, Respondent. … Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 , 65 S.Ct. 161, 164 , 89 L.Ed. 124, 129 (1944). [ A.B. v. Div. of Med.

FAIRFIELD TP. BD. OF ED. v. Kean

188 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1982

Super. 244 (1982) 457 A.2d 59 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF FAIRFIELD, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. THOMAS KEAN, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. … In the first Robinson v.

Matter of Thomas

278 N.J. Super. 580 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 1995

Coletti v. Union County Freeholders, 217 N.J. Super. 31, 35 , 524 A. 2d 1270 (App.Div. 1987) (citing Shapiro v. Essex County Freeholder Board, 177 N.J. Super. 87 , 424 A. 2d 1203 (Law Div. 1980), aff'd, 183 N.J. … Shapiro v. Essex County Freeholder Board, supra, 177 N.J.

NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCrane

119 N.J. Super. 457 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 15, 1971

McDonald v. Board of Election Com'rs of Chicago, 394 U.S. 802, 809 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969); United States v. … [at 124, citations omitted] State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N.J.

Flecker v. Statue Cruises, LLC

444 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 2013

NLRB v. City Disposal Sys., 465 U.S. 822, 831 , 104 S.Ct. 1505 , 79 L.Ed.2d 839 (1984). However, two related decisions of the National Labor Relations Board provide guidance. In Meyers Indus., Inc. v. … Thus, the controversy presented to the state court is different from that which could have been, but was not, presented to the Labor Board. [Hume v. Am. Disposal Co., 124 Wash.2d 656 , 880 P.2d 988, 993 (1994).]

Borough of Dumont v. Caruth

123 N.J. Super. 331 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 6, 1973

The Legislature clearly intended to allow the municipalities, through their boards of recreation commissioners, to regulate the “use” of parks as well as conduct while using them. … Indeed, the court distinguished the case of Davis v. Massachusetts, 167 U. S. 43 , 17 S. Ct. 731 , 42 L.

MacMillan v. Taxation Div. Director

180 N.J. Super. 175 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 1981

Brown, Connery, Kulp, Wille, Purnell & Greene, attorneys for respondents Dorothy S. MacMillan et al. Smith, Stratton, Wise & Heher, attorneys for respondents Gertrude Mills et al. … Turnpike Auth. v.

New Concepts for Living v. Hackensack

376 N.J. Super. 394 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 13, 2005

He contacted the Bergen County Tax Appeal Board in an attempt to appeal the City's decision. The Tax Appeal Board informed him that plaintiff was "out of time" to file an appeal. … Pangborne & Co. v.

Congleton v. Pura-Tex Stone Corp.

53 N.J. Super. 282 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1958

Hannigan v. Goldfarb, 53 N.J. Super. 190 ( App. Div. Dec. 15, 1958); Shaffer v. Brown, 32 N.J. Super. 413 ( App. Div. 1954) in which employment was found upon facts quite similar to those at bar. … It is interesting to note that in respondent's brief no attempt is made to distinguish Shaffer v. Brown, supra . Indeed respondent does not even mention the case, even though petitioner's brief relies upon it heavily.

Abra-May Cem. Sales Co. v. DEGEL YEHUDO CEM. CORP

92 N.J. Super. 365 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1966

Terwilliger v. Graceland Memorial Park Ass'n, 35 N.J. 259 (1961); Frank v. Clover Leaf Park Cemetery Ass'n, 29 N.J. 193 (1959); Passaic Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. East Ridgelawn Cemetery, 137 N.J. … Approval of the Degel Yehudo board of directors by a three-fifths vote is prerequisite to any resale by Abra-May to a third party.

Haelig v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF BOUND BROOK BOROUGH

105 N.J. Super. 7 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 3, 1969

Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., 35 N.J. 343, 351-352 (1961). … See Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp., supra, at p. 353, n. 3. The background and decisions under the analogous federal rule, Fed. R. Civ. P. 54( b ), are instructive.

Larson v. MAYOR

99 N.J. Super. 365 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 1968

Kozesnik v. Montgomery Twp., 24 N.J. 154 (1957); Schmidt v. Board *373 of Adjustment, Newark, 9 N.J. 405 (1952). … See Katobimar Realty Co. v. Webster, supra ; Reingold v. Harper, 6 N.J. 182 (1951); Lakewood Express Service v. Board of Public Utility Com'rs., 1 N.J. 45 (1948); N.J. Good Humor, Inc. v.

TOWN OF CLINTON v. BOROUGH OF LEBANON (NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 6, 2022

A-2502-21 TOWN OF CLINTON, Petitioner-Respondent, v. … See, e.g., Hayes v.