Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.82s
Donovan v. Bergen County Board of Chosen Freeholders
436 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 30, 2014
See Prunetti v. Mercer Cnty. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 350 N.J.Super. 72, 84-86 , 794 A.2d 278 (Law Div.2001) (discussing history of the Charter Law)'. … Murray v. Plainfield Rescue Squad, 210 N.J. 581, 584 , 46 A.3d 1262 (2012); Zabilowicz v. Kelsey, 200 N.J. 507, 512-13 , 984 A.2d 872 (2009).
Cited 1 timesPublishedShepard v. Woodland Township Committee & Planning Board
135 N.J. Super. 97 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1975
Bridge Park Co. v. Highland Park, 113 N. J. Super. 219, 221-222 (App. Div. 1971). Cf. Hinman v. Planning and Zoning Comm’n, 26 Conn. Sup. 125 , 214 A. 2d 131 (Comm. Pl. 1965). … A. 40:55-30, 32, Bridge Parle Co. v. Highland Park, 113 N. J. Super. 219, 221-222 (App. Div. 1971).
Cited 1 timesPublishedMichelotti Realty Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
191 N.J. Super. 568 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 1983
As was noted in Amato v. … Kessler v. Bowker, 174 N.J.Super. 478, 485 (App.Div.1979). See, also, Yahnel v. Jamesburg Bd. of Adj., 79 N.J.Super. 509, 517 (App.Div.1963), certif. den. 41 N.J. 116 (1963); Bern v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHalenar v. Sayreville Board of Education
177 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1981
That Board affirmed a determination of the Appeal Tribunal that claimant was ineligible for benefits. … Appellant was a teacher employed by the Sayreville Board of Education (Sayreville) commencing in September 1972.
Cited 0 timesPublishedD'Arrigo v. New Jersey State Board of Mediation
228 N.J. Super. 189 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 1988
Metromedia, Inc. v. Dir. Div. of Taxation, 97 N.J. 313, 327-328 (1984); Schuenemann v. Board of Review, 208 N.J.Super. 48, 51-52 (App.Div.1986). … Voca v.
Reversed on other grounds by D'Arrigo v. New Jersey State Board of Mediation, 119 N.J. 74 (1990)Cited 5 timesPublishedGlassboro v. Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders
199 N.J. Super. 91 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1985
Mas-trangelo, Inc. v. … See Asbell v. Kansas, 209 U.S. 251 , 28 S.Ct. 485 , 52 L.Ed. 778 (1908); Reid v. Colorado, 187 U.S. 137, 23 S.Ct. 92 , 47 L.Ed. 108 (1902); Baldwin v. G.A.F.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPop Realty Corp. v. Springfield Board of Adjustment
176 N.J. Super. 441 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 11, 1980
In Cochran v. … Moreover, it is not mandatory for a township to create a planning board and a governing body could assume directly the duties of a planning board. Jones v. Long Beach Tp. Zon.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNJ State Bd. of Optometrists v. Koenigsberg
33 N.J. Super. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1954
New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S.S. Kresge Co., 113 N.J.L. 287 ( Sup. Ct. 1934), modified 115 N.J.L. 495 ( E. & A. 1935); Abelson's, Inc., v. New Jersey State Board of Optometrists, 5 N.J. 412 (1950). … New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S.S. Kresge Co., supra, 113 N.J.L. 287, 294 ( Sup. Ct. 1934).
Cited 7 timesPublishedPrice v. Excise Board of Town of Millburn
29 N.J. Super. 103 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 5, 1953
Bumball v. Burnett, 115 N.J.L. 254 ( Sup. Ct. 1935); Zicherman v. Driscoll, 133 N.J.L. 586 ( Sup. Ct. 1946); *108 Biscamp v. Township of Teaneck, 5 N.J. Super. 172 ( App. Div. 1949). Cf. Ring v. … Bumball v. Burnett, supra ; Biscamp v. Teaneck, supra; Ring v. North Arlington, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPuleio v. North Brunswick Township Board of Adjustment
375 N.J. Super. 613 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 2005
Plaintiff contends that pursuant to Industrial Lessors, Inc. v. … Basralian, supra, 319 N.J.Super. at 207 , 725 A.2d 64 (quoting Elco v. R.C. Maxwell Co., 292 N.J.Super. 118, 126 , 678 A.2d 323 (App.Div.1996)); See Also Kohl v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedTP. OF LAFAYETTE v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
208 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1986
THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX; EDMUND J. ZUKOWSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD; JAMES J. … Schear v. Elizabeth, 41 N.J. 321, 326 (1964).
Cited 12 timesPublished106 N.J. Super. 420 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 24, 1969
See Amico v. Board of Review, 49 N.J. 159, 168 (1967). … See Soricelli v. Board of Review, 46 N.J. Super. 299 ( App. Div. 1957).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSelf v. Board of Review & Building Services Corp.
182 N.J. Super. 361 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 1981
See Morgan v. Board of Review, 77 N.J.Super. 209 (App.Div.1962); White v. Bd. of Review, 146 N.J.Super. 268 (App.Div.1977). … See Stonco v. Board of Review, 106 N.J.Super. 6, 8 (App.Div.1969).
Reversed by Self v. Board of Review, 91 N.J. 453 (1982)Cited 2 timesPublishedApogee Trucking, LLC v. Board of Review
429 N.J. Super. 552 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 2013
Bd. of Educ. of Neptune v. Neptune Twp. Educ. Ass’n, 144 N.J. 16, 31 , 675 A.2d 611 (1996). … Apogee now argues that Beckles’s claim is analogous to and controlled by Yardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review, 114 N.J. *556 371 , 554 A.2d 1337 (1989), a case in which unemployment benefits were denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSitkowski v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Lavallette
238 N.J. Super. 255 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 9, 1990
Hilton Acres v. Klein, 35 N.J. 570, 581 , 174 A.2d 465 (1961). … Trenkamp v. Township of Burlington, supra, 170 N.J.Super. at 271 , 406 A.2d 218 ; see also, East Hanover Tp. v. Cuva, 156 N.J.Super. 159, 165-166 , 383 A.2d 725 (App.Div.1978); Howland v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedRusso Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of Education
280 N.J. Super. 320 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 21, 1995
See Rosenau v. … We have not attempted to decide whether the flooding which plaintiffs allege amounts to a taking by either the Board of Education or the City or both. See Hawkins v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedState v. Middlesex County Board of Chosen Freeholders
208 N.J. Super. 342 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1986
Chancery Division entered in this matter are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Skillman in his written opinion of June 12, 1985, reported in State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection v. … Middlesex County Board of Chosen Freeholders, et al., 206 N.J.Super. 414 (Ch.Div.1985). Affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBarnes v. East Orange Board of Education
427 N.J. Super. 516 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 22, 2012
The Board sought oral argument on its motion for reconsideration, which was improperly denied by the judge without explanation. See R. 1:6-2; Raspantini v. … In Leidy v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSansone Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment
211 N.J. Super. 304 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 18, 1986
Board of Adj., Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 282 (1965). While its function is termed “ij'M&sí-judieial,” a board of adjustment “partakes of the judicial” nonetheless, Handlon v. … Planning Bd. v. Tp.
Cited 6 timesPublished372 N.J. Super. 341 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 2004
It concluded that because of a footnote in the case of Franklin Township v. Board of Ed. N. of Hunterdon Reg. … Board of Ed. of Rancocas Valley Reg’l High Sch. Dist. v. New Jersey Bd. of Ed., 364 N.J.Super. 623, 631 , 837 A.2d 1110 (App.Div.2003).
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna