Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.99s

  • S.P. v. Newark Police Department

    428 N.J. Super. 210 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 2012

    Kolitch v. … Macaluso v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Schaible Oil Co. v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

    246 N.J. Super. 29 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1991

    As this court explained in Scrudato v. … Department of Community Affairs v. Wertheimer, 177 N.J.Super. at 599 , 427 A.2d 592 . White v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Greenberg v. Greenberg

    126 N.J. Super. 96 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 11, 1973

    Blaine v. Blaine, 96 N.J. Super. 460, 462 (Ch. *100 Div. 1967). … Painter v. Painter, 118 N.J. Super. 332 (Ch. Div. 1972).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. Leopoldi

    20 N.J. Super. 43 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 27, 1952

    This precise point was advanced by the seceding group in Walter Kidde & Co., Inc., v. United Electrical, Radio, etc., supra . In Brown v. Hook, 79 Cal. … Hirji Mulji v. Cheong Yue S.S. Co., A.C. 497, 507 ( Privy Council 1926); Brown v. Oshiro, 68 Cal. App. 2 d 393, 156 P. 2 d 976 ( Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1945).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Reingold v. Harper

    7 N.J. Super. 525 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1950

    Lakewood Express Service v. Board of Public Utility Com'rs., 1 N.J. 45 . … State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N.J. Eq. 504 ( E. & A. 1935).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. State Highway Dept. of NJ

    29 N.J. Super. 188 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1954

    Gough v. Bell, 22 N.J.L. 441 ( Sup. Ct. 1850), affirmed sub nom. Bell v. … Shamberg v. Board of Riparian Commissioners, 72 N.J.L. 132 ( Sup. Ct. 1905).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund v. Gonzalez

    227 N.J. Super. 609 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 29, 1988

    That separate action is entitled: Francisco v. Gonzalez et al., docket # L-073681-81. … Y. & N.J. v. Bosco, 193 N.J.Super. 696 (App.Div.1984).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State of New Jersey v. Keshaun D. Earley

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 5, 2025

    at 383 (quoting State v. Dreher, 302 N.J. Super. 408, 489 (App. Div. 1997), abrogated on other grounds by, State v. Brown, 170 N.J. 138 (2001)). … Defendant has provided no affidavit or certification from Quaran Brown based on Brown's personal knowledge nor has defendant located Brown. See generally State v. Nevius, 426 N.J. Super. 379, 394-95 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • DOROTHY MOORE VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 25, 2017

    A-4455-15T4 DOROTHY MOORE, Appellant, v. … Simonelli and Gooden Brown.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • MEDFORD COMMONS, LLC VS. LEXON INSURANCE COMPANY (L-0222-08, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 26, 2019

    . __________________________________ Argued on October 10, 2019 – Decided December 26, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz, Whipple and Gooden Brown. … When read as a whole, the Bond's reference to "approving authority" is clearly a reference to the Planning Board. See Hardy v. Abdul- Matin, 198 N.J. 95, 103 (2009).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Township of Berkeley Heights v. County of Union

    311 N.J. Super. 577 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 1998

    In County of Bergen v. … Given the admonition in Roe v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. Furman

    59 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1959

    In Gundaker Central Motors v. … Morss v. Forbes, 24 N.J. 341, 370 (1957).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rawitz v. County of Essex

    347 N.J. Super. 590 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 2000

    who lacked necessary qualifications were de facto office holders for purpose of review of board’s decision to impose sanctions); Suruda v. … v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Buckley v. Cuban American Sugar Co.

    129 N.J. Eq. 322 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 1940

    Day v. United States Cast Iron Pipe and Foundry Co., 95 N.J. Eq. 389 ; 123 Atl. Rep. 546 ; Bassett v. United States Cast Iron Pipe and Foundry Co., 75 N.J. Eq. 539 ; 73 *Page 329 Atl. Rep. 514; Willcox v. … Rep. 115 ; Consolidated Film Industries v. Johnson (Del.), 197 Atl. Rep. 489 ; Roberts v. Roberts-Wicks Co. ( New York Court of Appeals ), 77 N.E. Rep. 13 ; Patterson v. Durham Hosiery Mills, 200 S.E. Rep. 906 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Scott v. State

    265 N.J. Super. 591 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1993

    In other words, it has all of the hallmarks of an administrative rule as defined by Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 97 N.J. 313, 331-32 , 478 A. 2d 742 (1984). Cf. Stratford Nursing Ctr. v. … Co. v. Transportation Dep't of N.J., 175 N.J. Super. 84, 89-92 , 417 A. 2d 592 (App.Div. 1980).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • MICHAEL DENHAM VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 2019

    A-5052-16T1 MICHAEL DENHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Brown- Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 (1999)). "An appellate tribunal is, however, in no way bound by the agency's interpretation of a statute or its determination of a strictly legal issue." Mayflower Secs. Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Allendale Nursing Home, Inc. v. BOR. ALLENDALE

    141 N.J. Super. 155 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1976

    In November 1971 the nursing home applied to the Allendale Board of Adjustment for a variance to build a 50-bed addition to its 100-bed facility. … Indeed, it is well settled that a board of adjustment and the governing body have the right to attach conditions to the issuance of variances in order to protect the public's health, safety and welfare. See Alperin v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • M & D ASSOCIATES v. Mandara

    366 N.J. Super. 341 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 2004

    Super. 341 M & D ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … See Bron v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Kugler v. Romain

    110 N.J. Super. 470 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 10, 1970

    Duke Power Co. v. … Baird v. Board Recreation Comm'rs, South Orange, 110 N.J. Eq. 603, 605 (E. & A. 1932). Such violations are left to the agencies charged with the enforcement of the criminal law. Trisolini v. Meltsner, 23 N.J.

    Modified by Kugler v. Romain, 58 N.J. 522 (1971)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Christopher Regan v. Brad Conway

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 7, 2025

    Koger, Inc., 251 N.J. 162, 188 (2022) (citing Brown v. Brown, 348 N.J. Super. 466, 478 (App. Div. 2002)). … Brown, 348 N.J. Super. at 483 (quoting Lawson Mardon Wheaton v. Smith, 160 N.J. 383, 398 (1999)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.