Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.77s

  • Mulcahy v. Bergen County Board of Elections

    156 N.J. Super. 429 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1978

    Consequently, the Bergen County Board of Elections was unable to and did not certify a winner. … J. 32 (1965); Sadlock v. Allan, 25 N. J. 118, 129 (1957), and Fiscella v. Nulton. 22 N. J. Super. 367, 372 (App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Watford v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board

    113 N.J. Super. 495 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 23, 1971

    Corrigan v. Gassert, 27 N. J. 277, Dixon v. Gassert, 26 N. J. 1 (1958). … See Douglas v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Buena Regional Education Ass'n

    300 N.J. Super. 415 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1997

    Although the Commissioner and State Board of Education have primary responsibility for the interpretation and administration of the State’s education laws, see Abbott v. … In Accardi v. Pennsylvania R.R.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Michelotti Realty Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    191 N.J. Super. 568 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 1983

    As was noted in Amato v. … Kessler v. Bowker, 174 N.J.Super. 478, 485 (App.Div.1979). See, also, Yahnel v. Jamesburg Bd. of Adj., 79 N.J.Super. 509, 517 (App.Div.1963), certif. den. 41 N.J. 116 (1963); Bern v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Estate of Boyle v. Board of Trustees

    234 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1989

    State v. Butler, 89 N.J. 220, 226 (1982). … Cwiklinski v. Burton, 217 N.J.Super. 506, 509 (App.Div.1987). This presumption implies receipt of an intrastate mailing within 15 days after its posting. See Waite v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Township of Winslow v. Board of Education

    108 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1970

    The board appeals. The core holding of the trial court was that the board had acquired the land “for school purposes,” contrary to N. J. S. … The township points out- that the board’s brief does not expressly attack the trial court’s finding that the acquisition by the board of this land was for school purposes.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Simon v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    281 N.J. Super. 417 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1995

    The Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders (Freeholders) are defendants in all three matters and the Camden County Counsel is a defendant in docket number A-6472-92T1. … Herrera v. Township of South Orange, 270 N.J.Super. 417 , 637 A.2d 526 (App.Div.1993), certif. denied 136 N.J. 28 , 641 A.2d 1039 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • William E. Newman, Jr. v. Board of Review

    434 N.J. Super. 483 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 2014

    In Rivera v. … See Air-Way Branches, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Halenar v. Sayreville Board of Education

    177 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1981

    That Board affirmed a determination of the Appeal Tribunal that claimant was ineligible for benefits. … Appellant was a teacher employed by the Sayreville Board of Education (Sayreville) commencing in September 1972.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McVoy v. Board of Adjustment of Montclair Tp.

    213 N.J. Super. 109 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1986

    The same prohibition applies to members of a planning board. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-23b. We held in Zell v. Borough of Roseland, 42 N.J. … See Sokolinski v. Woodbridge Tp. Municipal Council, 192 N.J.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Carine v. CLIFFSIDE PARK BOARD OF EDUCATION

    161 N.J. Super. 137 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1978

    Super. 137 (1978) 390 A.2d 1228 ARTHUR CARINE, ANNE MARIE CARINE, JOSEPH TRAMUTOLA, ROBERT MASSA, THEODORE SCHMIDT, MARY LICATA, JOSEPH LICATA, ROSALYN LOBEL, ANITA HIRSH AND LEO KAZAZIAN, PLAINTIFFS, v. … Plaintiffs contend that according to Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus, 42 N.J. 556 (1964), public schools are subject to local zoning.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dilts v. Franklin Township Planning Board

    272 N.J. Super. 234 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 1994

    Appellate review of a municipal planning board’s decision is limited to whether the action of the board was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, or ultra vires. Burbridge v. … A planning board’s decision on questions of law, however, are subject to de novo review. Mayflower Sec. v. Bureau of Sec., 64 N.J. 85, 93 , 312 A.2d 497 (1973); Grancagnola v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Boards of Education

    145 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 16, 1975

    The Board of Education of the Township of Little Egg Harbor appeals from a final decision of the State Board of Education which affirmed a decision of the Commissioner of Education. … . * *■ * [Thomas v. Morris Tp. Bd. of Ed., 89 N. J. Super. 327, 332 (App. Div. 1965), aff’d 46 N. J. 581 (1966)] See also, Quinlan v. North Bergen Tp. Bd. of Ed., 73 N. J. Super. 40, 46-47 (App. Div. 1962).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Naughton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    246 N.J. Super. 649 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D'Arrigo v. New Jersey State Board of Mediation

    228 N.J. Super. 189 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 1988

    Metromedia, Inc. v. Dir. Div. of Taxation, 97 N.J. 313, 327-328 (1984); Schuenemann v. Board of Review, 208 N.J.Super. 48, 51-52 (App.Div.1986). … Voca v.

    Reversed on other grounds by D'Arrigo v. New Jersey State Board of Mediation, 119 N.J. 74 (1990)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Schwartz v. Board of Aldermen of Paterson

    106 N.J. Super. 208 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1969

    The suit was bottomed on the “one-man one-vote” principle enunciated in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533 , 84 S. Ct. 1362 , 12 L. Ed. 2d 506 (1964), specifically made applicable to municipal governments in Avery v. … In that year legislation was enacted creating three boards; a board of finance, a board of public works, and a board of fire and police commissioners, with members appointed by the mayor. *210 Most of the governmental powers

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Greene v. Hudson County Board of Health

    19 N.J. Super. 453 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1952

    Fox v. Board of Education of Newark, 129 N.J.L. 349 ( Sup. Ct. 1943). … Grosso v. Erdman, 128 N.J.L. 223 ( Sup. Ct. 1942); Kessler v. Minard, 134 N.J.L. 583 ( Sup. Ct. 1946); Gallena v. Scott, 4 N.J. Super. 86 ( App. Div. 1949); Fox v. Board of Education of Newark, supra .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • PRB Enterprises, Inc. v. South Brunswick Planning Board

    205 N.J. Super. 225 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 8, 1985

    In Lionel’s Appliance Center, Inc. v. … . *231 In Urban Farms, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Costello v. Board of Review

    273 N.J. Super. 536 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1994

    We agree with the Board and affirm. … Brown v. City of Newark, 113 N.J. 565, 573 , 552 A. 2d 125 (1989).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Essex County Welfare Board

    151 N.J. Super. 280 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 1977

    In dismissing the complaint the trial judge ruled that the board’s action was supported by “[a] fair and reasonable ex-tention of the holding of Redding v. Burlington Cty. Welf. Bd., 65 N. … The case of Bradford v. Juras, 331 F. Supp. 167 (D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.