Case law

State v. Parking Authority of Trenton

27 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1953

Super. 284 (1953) 99 A.2d 177 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, PLAINTIFF, v. THE PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, AND MARY G. … In all other respects, the Parking Authority of the City of Trenton is completely independent of the Board of Commissioners of the City of Trenton and the municipal corporation known as the City of Trenton."

Edgewater Park v. Edgewater Park Housing Auth.

187 N.J. Super. 588 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1982

[at 247] See, also, Prezlak v. Padrone, supra ; Ross v. Miller, 115 N.J.L. 61, 64-66 (Sup.Ct. 1935); Manno v. Clifton, 14 N.J. Super. 100, 102 (App.Div. 1951). … DeMuro v. Martini, 1 N.J. 516, 522 (1949); Houman v. Pompton Lakes, 155 N.J. Super. 129, 160-161 (Law Div. 1977); Riddlestorffer v. Rahway, 82 N.J.

Johnson v. Kolibas

75 N.J. Super. 56 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1962

He conceded that defendants operated "a clean boarding house" and that the fire probably originated from a lighted cigarette in Derczo's room. … Rappaport v. Nichols, 31 N.J. 188, 203 , 75 A.L.R. 2 d 821 (1959). Cf. Bernucci v.

New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency

448 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 2016

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOODEN BROWN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned). Defendant S.G. … Cesare v. Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 411-12 (1998).

Matthews v. City of Atlantic City

196 N.J. Super. 338 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 10, 1984

Compare Barnert v. Paterson, 48 N.J.L. 395 (Sup.Ct.1886) with Markham v. State, Dept. of *340 Revenue, 298 So.2d 210 (Fla.App.1974). See McQuillin Municipal Corporations (3d Ed 1968) § 12.137. … Moreover, the existence of statutes providing indemnity to a police officer, N.J.S.A. 40A:14-155, or a board of education member, N.J.S.A. 18A.-12-20, for defense of an action connected with the performance of his duties

Lyster v. Berberich

3 N.J. Super. 78 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 1949

Reid v. Brown, 24 N.J. Misc. 350 ( Dist. Ct. 1946); Spillner v. Guenther, 26 Id. 159 ( Sup. Ct. Circuit 1948). In Frayne v. Bahto, 137 N.J.L. 109 ( Sup. … However, the Appellate Division cited David v. Fayman, 78 N.Y.S.2d 188 ( App.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HAKUM BROWN STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RODNEY BROWN (16-06-1846, ESSEX COUNTY 15-06-0776, 15-10-1246, 16-06-0974, 16-06-0975, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 31, 2019

HAKUM BROWN, a/k/a HAKEEM BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … State v. Perez, 220 N.J. 423, 437 (2015). Sex offenders "subject to CSL are supervised by the Parole Board and face a variety of conditions beyond those imposed on non-sex-offender parolees." Ibid.

Coalition for Quality Health Care v. DEPT. OF BANKING & INS.

348 N.J. Super. 272 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 2002

New Jersey Carpenters v. Borough of Kenilworth, 147 N.J. 171, 179-80 , 685 A. 2d 1309 (1996)(quoting State v. … N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.7; N.J.A.C. 13:30-8.22 (State Board of Dentistry); N.J.A.C. 13:35-2.6 (State Board of Medical Examiners); N.J.A.C. 13:39A-2.1 (State Board of Physical Therapy); and N.J.A.C. 13:44E-3 (State Board of Chiropractic

Kent v. Borough of Mendham

111 N.J. Super. 67 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 9, 1970

We find the rationale expressed in Lettieri v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 24 N.J. 199, 206 (1957), cited by plaintiffs, to be inapplicable here. … legislative policy which required planning board action as a prerequisite to the enactment of a zoning ordinance.

Rosa v. Transport Operators Co.

45 N.J. Super. 438 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 1957

Carhal Factors, Inc., v. Salkind, 5 N.J. 485, 489 (1950); Hoffman v. Westlecraft, 85 N.J.L. 484, 486 ( Sup. Ct. 1914); Lee's Ex'x. v. Dolan's Adm'x., 39 N.J. Eq. 193, 195 ( Ch. 1884); Rogers v. … Wegiel v. Hogan, 28 N.J. Super. 144, 152 ( App.

THOMAS MULCAHEY VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 2019

, Fasciale and Gooden Brown. … The distinction urged by the Board compels an absurd result under those circumstances. See, e.g., Kocanowski v. Township of Bridgewater, 237 N.J. 3, 10 (2019) (quoting State v.

Michael v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

398 N.J. Super. 159 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 2008

Mandel v. UBS/PaineWebber, 373 N.J.Super. 55, 83-84 , 860 A.2d 945 (App.Div.2004). That a claim may turn out in the end to be groundless is not the necessary equivalent to it having been commenced in bad faith. Brown v. … Brown v.

KATHLEEN CHERRY VS. ZIAD HADAYA (C-000042-17, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 2021

In 2008, the Board approved the application. … Weinstein v. Swartz, 3 N.J. 80, 85-86 (1949) (quoting Humphreys v. Ibach, 110 N.J. Eq. 647, 652 (1932)).

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State

19 N.J. Tax 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 10, 2001

Conrail also appealed Kearny’s local assessment to the Essex County Board of Taxation. The Board affirmed Kearny’s assessment. … Corp. v. Hardyston Tp., supra, 8 N.J.

In re Estate of Harvey

2 N.J. Misc. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 1924

In view of Carter v. Bugbee, 91 N. J. Law 438; Id., 92 N. J. Law 390, and American Board, &c., v. Bugbee, 118 Atl. Rep. 700 , that question cannot be considered as open for determination b3r this court.

Blazer Corp. v. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth.

195 N.J. Super. 542 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1984

In support, plaintiff cites: Cowenhoven v. Freeholders, 44 N.J.L. 232 (Sup. Ct. 1882); Mayor of Jersey City v. Sackett, 44 N.J.L. 428 (E. & A. 1882); McFarlan v. … The hospital sought as additional relief the removal of the Commissioner of Health and all members of the Health Care Administration Board, together with punitive damages from the Commissioner and the members of the Board

St. Barnabas Med. Ctr. v. Essex Cty.

211 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 24, 1986

In Revere v. … As stated in Cohn v. Fisher, 118 N.J.

53-55 E. Kinney, LLC, Chesslete's Property LLC v. the City of Newark Central Planning Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 26, 2023

party pursuant to Stokes v. … (quoting Borough of Princeton v.

H. CHRISTINA CHEN-OSTER VS. THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TWP. OF MIDDLETOWN (L-0003-17, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 11, 2019

We have applied the doctrine to decisions made by zoning boards of adjustment. See, e.g., Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment for Chatham Twp., 202 N.J. Super. 312, 327 (App. Div. 1985). … In Stop & Shop Supermarket Company v.

Chatham v. Donaldson

69 N.J. Super. 277 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 13, 1961

Zahn v. Newark Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J. Super. 516, 520 ( App. Div. 1957). In Lieberman v. Saddle River Twp., 37 N.J. Super. 62, 68 ( App. … Mountain Lakes v. Mola, 60 N.J. Super. 419 ( Cty. Ct. 1960); Wright v. Vogt, 7 N.J. 1 (1951). Use by a family of a home under our customs includes more than simple use of a house and grounds for food and shelter.