Case law

Yellow Duck Nursery, Inc. v. Department of Institutions & Agencies

155 N.J. Super. 56 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 1977

Guill v. Hoboken Mayor and Council, 21 N. J. 574, 582-583 (1956). … Mason v. Civil Service Comm’n, 51 N. J. 115, 128 (1968); Robson v. Rodriquez, 26 N. J. 517, 523 (1958).

Brierley v. Rode

396 N.J. Super. 52 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 2007

Warrington v. Bird, 204 N.J.Super. 611, 617-18 , 499 A.2d 1026 (App.Div.1985), certif. denied, 103 N.J. 473 , 511 A.2d 653 (1986); Mulraney v. … Although the planning board’s resolution did not require valet parking for those spaces, the tavern’s witnesses represented to the board that the area would be used exclusively by its valets.

In Re Petition of Fifteen Registered Voters, Cty. of Sussex

129 N.J. Super. 296 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 1974

Wright, an active candidate for the office, as the board of canvassers and county board of elections decided, or should be disregarded, as the judge below determined, because they were voted only for "Wright" or "Mr. … O'Brien v. Bayonne Board of Councilmen, 30 A. 430 (Sup. Ct. 1894; not officially reported); Weeks v. Kip, 64 N.J.L. 61 (Sup. Ct. 1899); Davis v. Bell, 27 N.J.L.J. 76 (Cir. Ct. 1904; not officially reported).

Kent v. Borough of Mendham

111 N.J. Super. 67 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 9, 1970

We find the rationale expressed in Lettieri v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 24 N.J. 199, 206 (1957), cited by plaintiffs, to be inapplicable here. … legislative policy which required planning board action as a prerequisite to the enactment of a zoning ordinance.

State v. Moriarty

133 N.J. Super. 563 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 1975

Brown, Vogelman & Ashley, attorneys). Mr. Horatius A. Greene, II, argued the cause for appellant Shirley Marie Watford ( Mr. William O. Perkins, Jr., attorney and on the brief). Mr. … State v. Washington, 57 N.J. 160 (1973); State v. Mulvihill, supra ; State v. Koonce, supra . The charge did not remove the intent issue from the jury's consideration.

Infocomp Corp. v. Somerset Trust Co.

165 N.J. Super. 382 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1979

Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N. J. 2 (1969). Plaintiff appealed from that judgment. … Evans-Aristocrat Industries, Inc. v. Newark, 140 N. J. Super. 226 (App. Div. 1976), aff’d 75 N. J. 84 (1977); Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. Garfield, 87 N. J. Super. 65, 75 (App. Div. *384 1965); Keenan v. Essex Cty.

Blazer Corp. v. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth.

195 N.J. Super. 542 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1984

In support, plaintiff cites: Cowenhoven v. Freeholders, 44 N.J.L. 232 (Sup. Ct. 1882); Mayor of Jersey City v. Sackett, 44 N.J.L. 428 (E. & A. 1882); McFarlan v. … The hospital sought as additional relief the removal of the Commissioner of Health and all members of the Health Care Administration Board, together with punitive damages from the Commissioner and the members of the Board

Mindel v. TP. COUNCIL OF TP. OF FRANKLIN

167 N.J. Super. 461 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1979

Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. Kearny, 70 N.J. 289, 298-299 (1976). Kozesnik v. … In Delawanna Iron and Metal Co. v.

Lyster v. Berberich

3 N.J. Super. 78 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 1949

Reid v. Brown, 24 N.J. Misc. 350 ( Dist. Ct. 1946); Spillner v. Guenther, 26 Id. 159 ( Sup. Ct. Circuit 1948). In Frayne v. Bahto, 137 N.J.L. 109 ( Sup. … However, the Appellate Division cited David v. Fayman, 78 N.Y.S.2d 188 ( App.

Poff v. Caro

228 N.J. Super. 370 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 1987

Crowe v. De Gioia, 90 N.J. at 132-134 . The Court must always consider and apply principles of justice, equity and morality. Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Service Electrical Cable TV, 198 N.J. … See also School Board of Nassau County, Fla. v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 , 107 S.Ct. 1123, 1128 , 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987). The complainants here do not have AIDS and therefore do not have a "handicap."

Chatham v. Donaldson

69 N.J. Super. 277 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 13, 1961

Zahn v. Newark Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J. Super. 516, 520 ( App. Div. 1957). In Lieberman v. Saddle River Twp., 37 N.J. Super. 62, 68 ( App. … Mountain Lakes v. Mola, 60 N.J. Super. 419 ( Cty. Ct. 1960); Wright v. Vogt, 7 N.J. 1 (1951). Use by a family of a home under our customs includes more than simple use of a house and grounds for food and shelter.

Nordstrom v. Lyon

424 N.J. Super. 80 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 2012

Urban Renewal Co. v. Capograsso, 383 N.J.Super. 470, 476 , 892 A.2d 711 (App.Div.2006) (citing Rova Farms, supra, 65 N.J. at 483-84 , 323 A.2d 495 ; Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. … Kirk v. French, 324 N.J.Super. 548, 552 , 736 A.2d 546 (Law Div.1998) (citing Wene v. Meyner, 13 N.J. 185,196 , 98 A.2d 573 (1953)).

801 AVENUE C, INC. v. City of Bayonne

127 N.J. Super. 128 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 1974

Instead, it proposed to administer the ordinance through the procedure of board of adjustment variances and planning board site plan approval on a case by case basis. … Wilson v. Mountainside, supra, 42 N.J. at 443-447; Rockhill v. Chesterfield Tp., 23 N.J. 117 (1957); Davidow v. South Brunswick Tp. Bd. of Adj., 123 N.J. Super. 162, 166 (App. Div. 1973); Kozesnik v.

Cammarata v. ESSEX COUNTY PARK COMMN.

46 N.J. Super. 262 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 3, 1957

Edwards v. Mayor & Council of Borough of Moonachie, 3 N.J. 17 (1949); Kirsch Holding Co. v. *270 Borough of Manasquan, 24 N.J. Super. 91 ( App. Div. 1952); Essex County v. Hindenlang, 35 N.J. Super. 479 ( App. … Eckelmann, Inc., v. Jones, 4 N.J. 207, 213 (1950).

State v. Robinson

139 N.J. Super. 475 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1976

State v. Gardner, 51 N. J. 444, 457-459 (1968); State v. Brown, 22 N. J. 405, 410-411 (1956). … Mullaney v. Wilbur, supra, 421 U. S. at 692 , 95 S. Ct. at 1885 , 44 L. Ed. 2d at 516 ; State v. Brown, supra, 22 N. J. at 410. But there is a vast difference between a permissible inference and a presumption of fact.

Oliveri v. CARLSTADT-E. RUTHERFORD BD. OF EDUC.

160 N.J. Super. 131 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 1978

We agree with Rice v. Union Cty. Reg. High School Bd. of Ed., 155 N.J. Super. 64 (App. … Preceding the nonpublic meeting of March 24 two public meetings were held by defendant board, one at 7:30 p.m. in the board conference room and the other at 8:00 p.m. in the high school library.

Jones v. Sportelli

166 N.J. Super. 383 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1979

See Harvey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 392 (1959). … Mullen v. Board of Ed., 81 N.J. Super. 151, 159 (App. Div. 1963).

State v. Irizarry

271 N.J. Super. 577 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1994

See State v. … See, Graham v.

Elting v. Frieman

89 N.J. Super. 433 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1965

Decided December 7, 1965. *434 Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN. Mr. Lewis M. Holland argued the cause for appellants Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland. Mr. Edward Pesin argued the cause for the defendants. … Jur., Attorneys at Law, § 280, p. 201 and Brauer v. Hotel Associates, Inc., 40 N.J. 415, 422 (1963).

IN RE PETITION FOR EQUITABLE MODIFICATION OF THE COST APPORTIONMENTS FOR THE RIVER DELL REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, BERGEN COUNTY (NEW JERSEY COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 21, 2018

. ______________________________ Argued April 5, 2017 – Decided June 21, 2018 Before Judges Fuentes, Simonelli and Gooden Brown. … See Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473 (1973).