Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.18s

  • Tamburelli Properties Ass'n v. Borough of Cresskill

    308 N.J. Super. 326 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1998

    Unaware of this circumstance, in Inganamort Bros. v. … N.J.S.A. 54:3-26, in pertinent part, provides: Where no request for review is taken to the Tax Court to review the action or determination of the county board involving real property the judgment of the county board shall

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH CTY., INC. v. Cannizzaro

    204 N.J. Super. 531 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 2, 1985

    See, e.g., Brown v. Davis, 203 N.J. Super. 41 (Ch.Div. 1985). … In *542 Brown , the Court found no evidence that any prospective user of the subject property was offended or intimidated. Brown , at 904. The evidence presented here is quite to the contrary.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Matter of Public Hearings

    142 N.J. Super. 136 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1976

    Wilson v. Long Branch, 27 N.J. 360, 386 (1958). … Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31 , 82 *157 S.Ct. 549, 7 L.Ed. 2d 512 (1962); Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249 , 73 S.Ct. 1031 , 97 L.Ed. 1586 (1953); and see, Edelstein v. Ferrell, 120 N.J.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Jersey City v. Dept. of Envir. Protection

    227 N.J. Super. 5 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 1988

    TICHENOR, AND JERSEY CITY PLANNING BOARD PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … Smith argued the cause for appellant Jersey City Planning Board.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Andover Tp. v. Lake

    89 N.J. Super. 313 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 15, 1965

    Good Humor, Inc. v. Board of Com'rs etc., Bradley Beach, 124 N.J.L. 162, 170-171 ( E. & A. 1940) (peddling). This rule has been applied to junk yards. 47 Am. Jur. "Secondhand Dealers," § 6, pp. 556-557. … Vassallo v. Board of Com'rs etc., Orange, 125 N.J.L. 419, 421-422 ( E. & A. 1940) (licensing ordinance); Pfister v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Carpenters Apprentice Training & Education Fund v. Borough of Kenilworth

    284 N.J. Super. 521 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1995

    [Carteret Academy v. State Board, 102 N.J.L. 525, 528-629 , 133 A. 886 (Sup.Ct.1926), aff 'd o.b. 104 N.J.L. 165 , 138 A. 919 (E. & A.1927).] … The Institute was governed by a board of trustees who were elected solely by the member companies.

    Reversed by New Jersey Carpenters Apprentice Training & Education Fund v. Borough of Kenilworth, 147 N.J. 171 (1996)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 534 Hawthorne Ave. Corp. v. Barnes

    204 N.J. Super. 144 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1985

    Both sides rely upon the following passage in Scugoza v. Stockton, 166 N.J. … State v. Gill, 47 N.J. 441, 444 (1966).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Parking Authority of Trenton

    27 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1953

    Super. 284 (1953) 99 A.2d 177 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, PLAINTIFF, v. THE PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, AND MARY G. … In all other respects, the Parking Authority of the City of Trenton is completely independent of the Board of Commissioners of the City of Trenton and the municipal corporation known as the City of Trenton."

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Trenton Psychiatric Hosp.

    331 N.J. Super. 31 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 2000

    In Carroll v. … Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 560 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1380 , 12 L.Ed. 2d 506, 526 (1964); Gangemi v. Rosengard, 44 N.J. 166, 170 , 207 A. 2d 665 (1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ji v. Palmer

    333 N.J. Super. 451 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 2000

    See New Jersey Bar Ass'n v. New Jersey Ass'n of Realtor Boards, 93 N.J. 470, 479-80 , 461 A. 2d 1112 (1983). … See Ji v. Atlantic City Zoning Board of Adjustment, A-4191-98T2 (App.Div. July 2000). [4] For a detailed description of the difference between a Certificate of Occupancy and a "zoning permit," see Township of Mahwah v.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • State v. Perwin

    131 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 13, 1974

    It is our opinion that the instant proceeding has been instituted in the wrong court and without the joinder of the board of chosen freeholders, a necessary party. … Reese v. Caldwell, 410 F. 2d 1125 (6 Cir. 1969); United States ex rel. Rush v. Ziegele, 335 F. Supp. 434, 436 (D. N. J. 1971), aff’d 474 F. 2d 1356 (3 Cir. 1973). Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Towne Center at Haddon Urban Renewal, LLC v. planning/zoning Board of the Township of Haddon

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 2024

    Likewise, as to Nuckel v. … Transit Corp. v. Borough of Somerville, 139 N.J. 582, 591 (1995); Kingsley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In re Appeal of Adoption of Rules Regarding Property Disposition of a Casino Licensee

    224 N.J. Super. 316 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1988

    Corp. v. N.J. Casino Control Comm’n, 85 N.J. 325, 328 (1981). … SOURCE: ATLANTIC CITY BOARD OF ASSESSORS & ATLANTIC COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION PREPARED BY: ATLANTIC CITY CASINO ASSOCIATION [Atlantic City Casino Association: Fact Sheet 4 (Oct. 1987)].

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Kobrin Securities, Inc.

    213 N.J. Super. 161 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 1986

    See Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 , 84 S.Ct. 1489 , 12 L.Ed.2d 653 (1964); N.J. Rules of Evidence Anno. 1986, Comments 1 and 6 to Evid. R. 25, and Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biorganic Laboratories, Inc., 87 N.J.Super. 23 (Ch. … Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148 , 78 S.Ct. 622 , 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958), gives us additional thoughts on the subject.

    Reversed on other grounds by State v. Kobrin Securities, Inc., 111 N.J. 307 (1988)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Edgewater Park v. Edgewater Park Housing Auth.

    187 N.J. Super. 588 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1982

    [at 247] See, also, Prezlak v. Padrone, supra ; Ross v. Miller, 115 N.J.L. 61, 64-66 (Sup.Ct. 1935); Manno v. Clifton, 14 N.J. Super. 100, 102 (App.Div. 1951). … DeMuro v. Martini, 1 N.J. 516, 522 (1949); Houman v. Pompton Lakes, 155 N.J. Super. 129, 160-161 (Law Div. 1977); Riddlestorffer v. Rahway, 82 N.J.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Schibell Mennie & Kentos LLC v. Allied World Insurance Company

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 2024

    L.A. v. N.J. Div. of Youth & Fam. Servs., 217 N.J. 311, 323 (2014) (citing Coyne v. N.J. … Voorhees v. Preferred Mut. Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Pba 208 v. Camden Cty. Bd. Freeholders

    124 N.J. Super. 119 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 1973

    Super. 119 (1973) 304 A.2d 784 PATROLMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL #208, PLAINTIFF, v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS AND ARNOLD CREAM, SHERIFF OF CAMDEN COUNTY, DEFENDANTS. … Additionally, it was held in Burlington County Evergreen Park Mental Hospital v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Azurak v. Corporate Prop. Investors

    347 N.J. Super. 516 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 2002

    Id. at 272-73 , 770 A. 2d 1144 (quoting Ramos v. Browning Ferris Indus. of S. … Browning Ferris Indus. of S. Jersey, Inc., 103 N.J. 177, 191 , 510 A. 2d 1152 (1986) (emphasis added) (citations omitted).] We have construed Ramos as a modification of Doloughty and in Gulf Oil Corp. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. DeMott

    128 N.J. Super. 395 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 17, 1974

    State v. … Palko v.

    Overruled in part by New Jersey State Parole Bd. v. Gray, 200 N.J. Super. 343 (1985)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Camden Trust Co. v. Handle

    130 N.J. Eq. 125 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 31, 1941

    Newbold v. Brown, 44 N.J. Law 266 ; Snider v. Freehold Theatre Co., supra; Calhoun v. Clark, 9 N.J. Mis. R. 490; Schulting v. Schulting, 41 N.J. Eq. 130 ; Woolston v. Pullen, 88 N.J. Eq. 35 ; Haulenbeck v. … In Newman v. Sanders, 89 N.J. Law 120 , it was held that an action for permissive waste will lie under our statute of waste. And see Newbold v. Brown, supra; Freeman v. Headley, 33 N.J. Law 523 ; Haulenbeck v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.