Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.59s

  • Jersey City Medical Center v. Halstead

    169 N.J. Super. 22 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 12, 1979

    JCMC relies heavily on Lucy Webb Hayes Nat'l Training School v. Geoghegan, 281 F. … Supp. at 117 ; see McCullough v. Hartpence, 141 N.J. Eq. 499, 502-503 (Ch. 1948); Brown's Mills Land Co. v. Pemberton Tp., 135 N.J. Eq. 203, 207-208 (Ch. 1944).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • KINGSTON BITUMINOUS, ETC. v. NJ Turnpike Auth.

    80 N.J. Super. 25 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1963

    It was so recognized in Newark v. N.J. … Accordingly, Hillside Twp. v. Sternin and Armaniaco v. Cresskill , above, are not apposite.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Matter of Public Hearings

    142 N.J. Super. 136 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1976

    Wilson v. Long Branch, 27 N.J. 360, 386 (1958). … Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31 , 82 *157 S.Ct. 549, 7 L.Ed. 2d 512 (1962); Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249 , 73 S.Ct. 1031 , 97 L.Ed. 1586 (1953); and see, Edelstein v. Ferrell, 120 N.J.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Jersey City v. Dept. of Envir. Protection

    227 N.J. Super. 5 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 1988

    TICHENOR, AND JERSEY CITY PLANNING BOARD PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … Smith argued the cause for appellant Jersey City Planning Board.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • D'Ercole v. MAYOR & COUNCIL, ETC.

    198 N.J. Super. 531 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1984

    Browne argued the cause on behalf of respondent Norwood Fire Company No. 1 ( Breitenstein & Browne, attorneys; Allan P. Browne on the brief). Francis J. … Roe v. Kervick, 42 N.J. 191, 207 (1964).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Murdock Contracting Co., Inc. v. Verona

    47 N.J. Super. 102 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 1957

    Schwitzer v. Board of Education, 79 N.J.L. 342 ; 75 Atl. Rep. 447 ; Peluso v. Hoboken, 98 N.J.L. 706 ; 126 Atl. Rep. 623 ; Peter's Garage, Inc., v. Burlington, 121 N.J.L. 523, 527 ; 3 Atl. … The defendant board expressly and specifically reserved `the right to waive minor informalities' in any bid.

    Overruled in part by Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island Heights, 138 N.J. 307 (1994)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tamburelli Properties Ass'n v. Borough of Cresskill

    308 N.J. Super. 326 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1998

    Unaware of this circumstance, in Inganamort Bros. v. … N.J.S.A. 54:3-26, in pertinent part, provides: Where no request for review is taken to the Tax Court to review the action or determination of the county board involving real property the judgment of the county board shall

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Van Ness v. Borough of Deal

    139 N.J. Super. 83 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 9, 1975

    The board is further empowered to lease bathhouses and cabanas to individuals who become members of the club and their guests at such rates and upon such terms as the board establishes by resolution. … Jones v. MacDonald, 33 N.J. 132, 135 (1960); Stothers v. Martini, 6 N.J. 560, 563 (1951); Jersey City v. Martin, 126 N.J.L. 353, 361 (E. & A. 1941).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Vickers v. Gloucester Tp. Comm.

    68 N.J. Super. 263 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1961

    See Duffcon Concrete Products v. Borough of Cresskill, 1 N.J. 509 (1949) (exclusion of heavy industry from a primarily residential town); Pierro v. Baxendale, 20 N.J. *269 17 (1955) (exclusion of motels); Fanale v. … with respect to the extent of consideration given to the proposed amendment by such board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Danka Funding Co. v. Sky City Casino

    329 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 21, 1999

    Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. California State Board of Equalization, 757 F. 2d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir.1985). See generally Brian C. … Bylaws of Pueblo of Acoma Business Board, Art.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hilil Nickerson v. Brink's Incorporated

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 24, 2025

    Arafa v. … See Morgan v. Sanford Brown Inst., 225 N.J. 289, 309 (2016); see also Barr v. Bishop Rosen & Co., 442 N.J. Super. 599, 606 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Gatto Design & Development Corp. v. Township of Colts Neck

    316 N.J. Super. 110 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 10, 1998

    Stauhs v. Board of Review, 93 N.J.Super. 451, 457 , 226 A.2d 182 (App.Div.1967). … See also Slocum v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH CTY., INC. v. Cannizzaro

    204 N.J. Super. 531 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 2, 1985

    See, e.g., Brown v. Davis, 203 N.J. Super. 41 (Ch.Div. 1985). … In *542 Brown , the Court found no evidence that any prospective user of the subject property was offended or intimidated. Brown , at 904. The evidence presented here is quite to the contrary.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Parking Authority of Trenton

    27 N.J. Super. 284 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1953

    Super. 284 (1953) 99 A.2d 177 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, PLAINTIFF, v. THE PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, AND MARY G. … In all other respects, the Parking Authority of the City of Trenton is completely independent of the Board of Commissioners of the City of Trenton and the municipal corporation known as the City of Trenton."

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ji v. Palmer

    333 N.J. Super. 451 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 2000

    See New Jersey Bar Ass'n v. New Jersey Ass'n of Realtor Boards, 93 N.J. 470, 479-80 , 461 A. 2d 1112 (1983). … See Ji v. Atlantic City Zoning Board of Adjustment, A-4191-98T2 (App.Div. July 2000). [4] For a detailed description of the difference between a Certificate of Occupancy and a "zoning permit," see Township of Mahwah v.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Sheerr v. Evesham Tp.

    184 N.J. Super. 11 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 22, 1982

    Lines v. … The court upheld the ordinance, but did so without reaching the taking issue. (3) Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U.S. 325 , 47 S.Ct. 594 , 71 L.Ed. 1074 (1927).

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Towne Center at Haddon Urban Renewal, LLC v. planning/zoning Board of the Township of Haddon

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 2024

    Likewise, as to Nuckel v. … Transit Corp. v. Borough of Somerville, 139 N.J. 582, 591 (1995); Kingsley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In re Appeal of Adoption of Rules Regarding Property Disposition of a Casino Licensee

    224 N.J. Super. 316 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1988

    Corp. v. N.J. Casino Control Comm’n, 85 N.J. 325, 328 (1981). … SOURCE: ATLANTIC CITY BOARD OF ASSESSORS & ATLANTIC COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION PREPARED BY: ATLANTIC CITY CASINO ASSOCIATION [Atlantic City Casino Association: Fact Sheet 4 (Oct. 1987)].

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Edgewater Park v. Edgewater Park Housing Auth.

    187 N.J. Super. 588 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1982

    [at 247] See, also, Prezlak v. Padrone, supra ; Ross v. Miller, 115 N.J.L. 61, 64-66 (Sup.Ct. 1935); Manno v. Clifton, 14 N.J. Super. 100, 102 (App.Div. 1951). … DeMuro v. Martini, 1 N.J. 516, 522 (1949); Houman v. Pompton Lakes, 155 N.J. Super. 129, 160-161 (Law Div. 1977); Riddlestorffer v. Rahway, 82 N.J.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Schibell Mennie & Kentos LLC v. Allied World Insurance Company

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 2024

    L.A. v. N.J. Div. of Youth & Fam. Servs., 217 N.J. 311, 323 (2014) (citing Coyne v. N.J. … Voorhees v. Preferred Mut. Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.