Case law

AT & T Communications v. Board of Adjustment

216 N.J. Super. 340 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1986

As such, the board’s determination on this issue is not entitled to its usual presumption of validity. See Supermarkets Oil v. Zollinger, 126 N.J.Super. 505 (App.Div.1974); Trenkamp v. … of Chatham v.

Wyndham Construction Co. v. Board of Adjustment

1 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 1949

An appeal to the Board of Adjustment was denied. Plaintiff first attacks the ordinance as prohibiting it from making lawful use of its property. … Next it is said that the Board of Adjustment had no jurisdiction to deny a variance. This argument is wholly without merit as a reading of R.S. 40:55-39 clearly indicates.

Holscher v. Board of Commissioners of Camden

7 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 1950

The only distinction between the facts of this case and those in our decision in the case of Ostroff et al. v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Camden, 7 N. J. … Our decision in Ostroff et al. v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Camden is controlling here. The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed, with costs.

Donovan v. Bergen County Board of Chosen Freeholders

436 N.J. Super. 91 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 2012

Examining Shapiro v. … Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 541-42 , 683 A.2d 818 (1996).

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. County Executive

357 N.J. Super. 242 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 2003

Nieder v. Royal Indemnity Ins. Co., 62 N.J. 229 , 300 A.2d 142 (1973). … There is also persuasive judicial authority that the Board of Education is not a county board. In Bd. of Trustees Mercer County Community College v.

BOARD OF ED. OF BELVIDERE v. Bosco

138 N.J. Super. 368 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1975

Super. 368 (1975) 351 A.2d 36 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN OF BELVIDERE, NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. MARGARET E. … In the opinion of this court that power continues to be vested in the board. The board relies heavily upon Durgin v. Brown, 37 N.J. 189 (1962).

Resnick v. East Brunswick Township Board of Education

144 N.J. Super. 474 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1976

Mountain Hill, L.L.C. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

403 N.J. Super. 210 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 10, 2008

V. … Angel v.

General Bowling Corp. v. Board of Review

166 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 8, 1979

General Bowling Corporation, the employer, appeals from a decision of the Board of Beview which affirmed a determination by the Appeal Tribunal that it failed to file a timely appeal from a decision of the deputy in the local … The Board of Review affirmed.

Weymouth Township Board of Education v. Wolf

178 N.J. Super. 481 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 1981

Plaintiff alleges that it was defamed by reason of certain remarks published by defendants, the substance of which indicates that the board misused, lost or possibly embezzled substantial school board funds. … State v. Time, Inc., supra; Reilly v. Curtiss, 83 N.J.L. 77 (Sup.Ct.1912). It is the conclusion of the court, therefore, that the principles outlined in Chicago v.

Parking Authority v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

180 N.J. Super. 282 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 1981

See Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529, 544 (1960); but cf. Durgin v. … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545 (1949); Epstein v. Long, supra, 133 N.J.Super. at 599 .

Margate Civic Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners

132 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 1975

Local boards considering applications for such transfers are invested by our Legislature with wide discretion, and their principal guide in making a determination is the public interest. Id., 303; Lubliner v. … Fanwood v. Rocco, 33 N. J. 404, 414 (1960).

Brown Strober Building Supply Corp. v. Fannew Realty, Inc.

174 N.J. Super. 491 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1980

Id.; see Furlong v. … In Johnson v. Fred L.

Jeffrey M. Brown Associates, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.

414 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 2010

Zurich places heavy reliance upon County of Hudson v. … Co. v. Home Indem. Co., 535 F.2d 232, 235 (3d Cir.1976); Great W. Drywall, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co., 161 Cal.App.4th 1033 , 74 Cal.Rptr.3d 657, 664-65 (2008); Carriers Ins. Co. v. Am. Policyholders’ Ins.

Sullivan v. Burlington County Board of Chosen Freeholders

179 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 1981

Their contention as set forth in Sullivan’s brief on this appeal is that “a collective negotiation agreement under the Employer-Employee Relations Act is a legal obligation which cannot be altered by action of the county board … Freeholder Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Prosecutor, 172 N.J.Super. 411 (App.Div.1980); In re Bergen Cty. Freeholder Bd. v. Bergen Cty. Prosecutor, 172 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.1980).

Barrett v. Monmouth County Board of Elections

307 N.J. Super. 191 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1997

of Elections (Board). … Barrett v. Monmouth County Board of Elections, 307 N.J.Super. 403 , 704 A. 2d 1053 (Law Div.1997), and need not be detailed here.

Tung-Sol Electric Inc. v. Board of Review

35 N.J. Super. 397 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 23, 1955

Mee’s Bakery v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 162 Pa. Super. 183 , 56 A. 2d 386 (Super. Ct. 1948); Erie Resistor Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 172 Pa. Super. 430 , 94 A. 2d 367 (Super. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 148 Ohio St. 419 , 75 N. E. 2d 567 (Sup. Ct. 1947) (cf. Beall v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, 101 N. E. *401 2d 780 (Ohio App. 1951)) ; Shay v.

Town of Harrison Board of Education v. Netchert

439 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 2014

Plaintiff relies heavily on Botkin v. … State AFL-CIO v. Bergen Cnty. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 121 N.J. 255 , 579 A.2d 1231 (1990); Hackensack Bd. of Educ. v. Hackensack, 64 N.J.Super. 560 , 165 A.2d 33 (App.Div.1960); Bd. of Educ. of Union City v.

Ciccolello v. Middlesex County Board of Freeholders

214 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 5, 1986

This statute was considered in Holman v. … See Fidelity Deposit Co. of Md. v. Abagnale, 97 N.J.Super. 132, 148 (Law Div.1967). In Kyle v.

Stockton v. Board of Education of Trenton

210 N.J. Super. 150 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 16, 1986

Ass’n v. Bd. of Educ., supra. … In its brief, the Board erroneously states that the Supreme Court in Williams v.