Case law

Borough of Belmar v. 201 16th Ave., Belmar

309 N.J. Super. 663 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 14, 1997

Parrillo’s Inc., 83 N.J. 309 , 416 A.2d 388 (1980) and Camara v. Board of Adjustment, 239 N.J.Super. 51 , 570 A.2d 1012 (App.Div. 1990). Belleville v. … Villari v.

AMG Associates v. Township of Springfield

123 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1973

The trial court, Grate v. Township of Springfield, 117 N. J. … Visco v. Plainfield, 136 N. J. L. 659 (Sup. Ct. 1948).

Home Properties of New York v. Ocino, Inc.

341 N.J. Super. 604 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 2001

See Paradiso v. Mazejy, 3 N.J. 110 , 69 A.2d 15 (1949); Finn v. Glick, 42 N.J.Super. 514 , 127 A.2d 204 (App.Div.1956). That was the situation here. The contract had not made time of the essence for closing. … Appeals, however, are from decisions of a trial court and not from opinions of a trial court, Glaser v.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. QUIASIA N. CARROLL (W-2018-005075-0408, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 8, 2018

prosecution witness at Brown's trial. … Id. at 213-14 (quoting Gibson, 218 N.J. at 292; then quoting State v. Brown, 205 N.J. 133, 144 (2011)).

Kinnan v. Wight

39 N.J. Eq. 501 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1885

Dolman v. Cook, 1 McCart. 56. Nor is there any reported case in this state holding the contrary doctrine.. Middleton v. Middleton, 8 Stew. Eq. 115, was not a case of retainer. … Gray v.

Bowen v. Olesky

37 N.J. Super. 19 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 23, 1955

Green v. Simpson & Brown Construction Co., 14 N.J. 66 (1953); Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Twp., 135 N.J.L. 555 ( E. & A. 1947). … Smith v. Mayor and Common Council of Newark, 33 N.J. Eq. 545, 552 ( E. & A. 1881); Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc., 10 N.J. Super. 258, 262 ( App. Div. 1950); McGowan v. Peter *26 Doelger Brewing Co., 10 N.J.

Thorpe v. Cohen

258 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 1992

See also Brown v. Puente, 257 N.J. … See Oswin v. Shaw, supra ; cf. Brown v. Puente, 257 N.J. Super. at 212-13 , 608 A. 2d 377 , supra. See also LaBarrie v. Housing Auth. of Jersey City, 143 N.J.

Bodies by Lembo v. Middlesex Cty.

286 N.J. Super. 298 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1996

Pucillo & Sons v. … In Poling v. Roman, 86 N.J.

Mutschler v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

337 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 2001

Pascucci v. … Courts extend substantial deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, DiMaria v. Board of Trs. of Pub. Employees’ Ret.

Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fd. Bd. v. Clifton

117 N.J. Super. 5 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 3, 1971

Super. 5 (1971) 283 A.2d 350 THE UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD AND JOSEPH POLAND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … LeFelt v. Nasarow, 71 N.J. Super. 538 (Law Div. 1962), aff'd p.c. 76 N.J. Super. 576 (App. Div. 1962); cert. den. LeFelt v. Aetna Ins. Co., 39 N.J. 86 (1963); Providence Wash. Ins. Co. v. Glens Falls Ins. Co., 114 N.J.

State v. Irizarry

271 N.J. Super. 577 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1994

See State v. … See, Graham v.

Sielski v. Sielski

254 N.J. Super. 686 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 1992

The order may require the defendant to pay the victim directly, to reimburse the Violent Crimes Compensation Board for any and all compensation paid by the Violent Crime Compensation Board directly to or on behalf of the … In Berg v.

Davidson v. Burstein

10 N.J. Super. 91 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1950

The tenant then applied to the Local Rent Advisory Board to review the propriety of the issuance of the certificate relating to eviction. … Opalach v. Cebulah, 2 N.J. Super. 139 , 65 A. 2d 67 ( App. Div. 1949). Vide, Hertzberg v. Siegel, 8 N.J. Super. 226 , 73 A. 2d 840 ( App. Div. 1950).

State v. Bradley

291 N.J. Super. 501 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 1996

In the detaining office at the time was a brown leather case belonging to defendant. The case was not in defendant's possession during his detention. … United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 822-23 , 102 S.Ct. 2157, 2171-72 , 72 L.Ed. 2d 572, 592 (1982). See also Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 502 (1983); Arkansas v.

In re the Adoption of Amendments to N.J.A.C. 6:11-8.4 & N.J.A.C. 6:11-8.5

249 N.J. Super. 52 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 1991

In early 1986 the State Board voted to review the bilingual test certification requirements. … New Jersey Pharmaceutical Association v. Klein, 140 N.J.Super. 16, 23 , 354 A.2d 707 (App.Div.1976). See also N.Y.T. Cable TV v.

Trenta v. Gay

191 N.J. Super. 617 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 19, 1983

Bar Ass'n v. N.J. Ass'n of Realtor Boards, 186 N.J. Super. 391 (Ch.Div. 1982), aff'd 93 N.J. 470 (1983); State v. Bander, 56 N.J. 196 (1970); N.J. Bar Ass'n v. Northern N.J. … Bar Ass'n v. N.J. Ass'n of Realtor Boards, supra 186 N.J. Super. at 391 .

Matter of Certain Amendments

258 N.J. Super. 290 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1992

Mastrangelo, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Dept. of Envtl. … Mastrangelo, Inc. v. Commissioner of Dep't of Envtl. Protection, supra, 90 N.J. at 686 , 449 A. 2d 516 .

Ranier v. Frieman

294 N.J. Super. 182 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 1996

Frieman, a board certified ophthalmologist. Dr. … Rosenblum v.

State v. Grissom

347 N.J. Super. 469 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 2002

Posner argued the cause for appellant, (Brown and Brown, attorneys; Raymond A. Brown and Alan Dexter Bowman, of counsel and on the brief). H. … In State v.

Bevacqua v. Renna

213 N.J. Super. 554 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 13, 1986

See, e.g., Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529, 540-543 (1960); State v. Goodman, 9 N.J. 569, 583-584 (1952); see also Glasser, A New Jersey Municipal Law Mystery: What is a *561 " Public Office? … The determination by the board consisted of a revocation for misconduct, a standard which does not depend upon a criminal conviction.