Case law

Joye v. HUNTERDON CENT. BD. OF ED.

353 N.J. Super. 600 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 12, 2002

The majority believes that it is bound by Board of Education, Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2559 , 153 L. … See Odenheim v.

State v. Freudenberger

358 N.J. Super. 162 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 10, 2003

The Board is given the authority "to revoke the person's release status and return the person to custody for the remainder of the term...." Ibid. … It was amended to transfer the responsibility to the State Parole Board by L. 2001, c. 79, § 6.

DONNA B. ESSICK v. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT) (CONSOLIDATED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 11, 2022

ESSICK, Appellant, v. … Welfare Bd. v. N.J. Civ. Serv. Comm'n, 93 N.J. 384, 390-91 (1983) (citing City of Newark v. Nat. Res. Council, 82 N.J. 830, 839 (1980)). Accordingly, we exercise limited review of the Board's decision. See Brady v.

State v. Louf

126 N.J. Super. 321 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 1973

All were processed through one Brown who was the common and key figure, as was Zicarelli here. Brown acted as broker in placing the loans, presumably for modernization and renovation of the home involved. … None of the applicants had any connection with one another though all dealt through Brown as their agent.

Tri-State Ship Repair & Dry Dock Co. v. City of Perth Amboy

349 N.J. Super. 418 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 2002

Group v. Wall Township, 310 N.J.Super. 548, 556 , 709 A. 2d 226 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 156 N.J. 384 , 718 A. 2d 1213 (1998). … We note at the outset that plaintiff agreed before the trial court that the borders of the redevelopment area were drawn by the Planning Board, not the governing body.

In re the Probate of the Will of Hebden

20 N.J. Eq. 473 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1869

Bennett v. Jackson, 2 Phil. 190 ; Parsons v. Miller, Ibid. 194. In Lemann v. … And calling upon witnesses by the testator himself, was held essential to the validity of a nuncupative will, in Winn v. Bob, 3 Leigh 140 ; Brown v. Brown, 2 Murphy 350; Gwin v. Wright, 8 Humphreys 639; Ridley v.

Township Committee of Hazlet v. Morales

119 N.J. Super. 29 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 24, 1972

See generally, Annotation, “Member of governmental board voting on measure involving his personal interest,” 133 A. L. R. 1257 (1941). … Thus remaining in office by the sufferance of the appointing board will not cure such a disability.’

Roe v. NJ Transit Rail Operations

317 N.J. Super. 72 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 1998

See Levin v. … (Ivy Hill) was assaulted on a vacant lot owned by the Newark Board of Education (Board). The lot was located between the apartment complex and a grocery store.

Rafferty v. Schatzman

81 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 11, 1963

with law, for the election in Middlesex County, indicated that the offices to be voted upon in the November general election would be for member of the State Senate, four members of the General Assembly, two members of the Board

MIDDLESEX CTY. HEALTH DEPT. v. Importico

315 N.J. Super. 397 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 17, 1998

Atlantic Coast Demolition & Recycling, Inc. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 112 F. 3d 652 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Essex County Utils. Auth. v. … State v. Brown, 99 N.J.Super. 22, 28 , 238 A. 2d 482 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 51 N.J. 468 , 242 A. 2d 16 (1968).

State v. Kropke

123 N.J. Super. 413 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1973

United States v. Eagleston 417 F. 2d 11 (10 Cir. 1969); Metheany v. United States, 365 F. 2d 90 (9 Cir. 1966) ; Ward v. United States, 110 U. S. App. D. C. 136, 289 F. 2d 877 (1961); King v. … There was proof that each group had independently conspired with Brown to falsely obtain F. H. A. backing, but there was no proof that any of the groups acted in concert with each other.

Zander v. Martine

66 N.J. Super. 310 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 1961

In Hess v. … In Wuchter v.

In Re Herrmann

130 N.J. Eq. 273 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 5, 1941

What was said in the case of Mount, 185 N.Y. 162 , cited in Herrmann v. … See, also, Meirs v. Persons, 92 N.J. Eq. 17 ; 111 Atl. Rep. 638 . Grace C.

De Vitis v. New Jersey Racing Com'n

202 N.J. Super. 484 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 1985

Virag initially served as presiding judge of the Freehold Board of Judges. The Board of Judges at a harness racing meeting has authority to "impose fines and penalties as prescribed by the Commission." … The State Steward affirmed the Board of Judges' decision following a second de novo proceeding over which he presided. See N.J.A.C. 13:71-3.8.

Schultz v. Waldons

60 N.J. Eq. 71 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1901

Brown (§ 261c) , do not, when carefully examined, support the complainant's case. … Brown in his treatise on the Statute of Frauds § 261, et. seq.; and by Mr. Reed in his treatise, volume 2, section 727, et seq.

Amatrudi v. Watson

19 N.J. Super. 67 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 17, 1952

Super. 67 (1952) 88 A.2d 7 SAMUEL AMATRUDI AND ANOTHER, ETC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WILLIAM WATSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 24, 1952. … Noice v. Brown, 39 N.J.L. 569 ( Sup. Ct. 1877). But unless the defendant has knowledge or notice of the relation of master and servant, he is guilty of no actionable wrong. Clark v. Clark, 63 N.J.L. 1 ( Sup. Ct. 1899).

In re the accounting of Green

37 N.J. Eq. 254 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 1883

Arnold, 60 Ga. 316 ; Lafont v. Ricard, Bail. Eq. 487; Mickle v. Brown, 4 Baxt. 468 ; Matthews v. Downs, 1 Jones Eq. 331 ; Latimer v. Hanson, 1 Bland 51 . … Div.) 598; but see Brown v. French, 125 Mass. 410; McDonald’s Case, 4 Redf. 321 ; Clark v. Anderson, 13 Bush 111 .

Vickers v. Gloucester Tp. Comm.

68 N.J. Super. 263 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1961

See Duffcon Concrete Products v. Borough of Cresskill, 1 N.J. 509 (1949) (exclusion of heavy industry from a primarily residential town); Pierro v. Baxendale, 20 N.J. *269 17 (1955) (exclusion of motels); Fanale v. … with respect to the extent of consideration given to the proposed amendment by such board.

State v. Clayton

19 N.J. Super. 556 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 26, 1952

The term may be terminated by the board of managers in accordance with its rules and regulations formally adopted.” … The term may be terminated by the board of managers in accordance with its rules and regulations formally adopted.”

State v. McCague

314 N.J. Super. 254 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 1998

She handed Green the warning letter and a short time later went to the van and obtained a brown paper bag from defendant Scozzare. … As stated in Morss v.