Case law

Hillas v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

120 N.J. Super. 105 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 13, 1972

What this means is simply that as a button on the control board or hallway panel is pushed, it registers on the board. The solenoid is a magnet which is activated by the selector on the control board. … As observed in Vespe v.

TP. OF TEANECK v. Lutheran Bible Institute

34 N.J. Super. 418 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1955

N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6 The State Division of Tax Appeals held the buildings exempt, affirming the decision of the County Board. Teaneck appeals. … City of Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N.J.L. 105, 106 ( Sup. Ct. 1941), affirmed City of Trenton v. Rider College, 128 N.J.L. 320 ( E. & A. 1942); cf. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v.

United Public Workers of America v. Fennimore

6 N.J. Super. 589 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 3, 1950

In the Court of Chancery in Fidelity, etc., Co. v. … Local No. 2508, Lumber and Sawmill Workers v. Cairns, 197 Wash. 476 , 85 P. 2d 1109 (1938); Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union No. 2623 v.

Magro v. City of Vineland

148 N.J. Super. 34 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1977

See State v. Fearick, 69 N.J. 32, 37-38 (1976); Dacunzo v. Edgye, 19 N.J. 443, 450-452 (1955); Petrangeli v. Barrett, 33 N.J. Super. 378, 386 (1954). … Div. 1974), aff'd o.b. 67 N.J. 69 (1975) (involving N.J.S.A. 18A:20-35 applicable to boards of education); Caltavuturo v. Passaic, 124 N.J. Super. 361 (App. Div.), certif. den. 63 N.J. 583 (1973).

Silco Auto. Vending Co. v. Puma

105 N.J. Super. 72 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1969

Meehan v. Board of Excise Com'rs, 29 N.J.L.J. 370 [73 N.J. Law, 382], 64 Atl. Rep. 689 . See, also, Hagan v. Town of Boonton, 62 N.J.L. 150 . … Olan Mills Inc. of Ohio v. Board of Commissioners, of City of Trenton, 40 N.J.

State v. Thompson

65 N.J. Super. 189 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1961

Frank Brown? THE WITNESS: Frank Brown and James Willis. THE COURT: And, two, James who? THE WITNESS: James Willis. THE COURT: James Willis. Now you want to have the benefit of the best two that you can think of. Mr. … State v. Smith, 32 N.J. 501 (1960).

State v. Lewis

93 N.J. Super. 212 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1966

. *213 Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN. Mr. Charles A. McGeary, assigned counsel, argued the cause for the appellant. Mr. Rudolph J. Rossetti, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. … See United States v. Romano, 328 U.S. 136 , 86 S.Ct. 279 , 15 L.Ed. 210 (1965); Tot v. United States, 319 U.S. 463 , 63 S.Ct. 1241 , 87 L.Ed. 1519 (1943); United States ex. rel . Murphy v.

Wadsworth v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BEDMINSTER TP.

11 N.J. Super. 502 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1951

WADSWORTH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BEDMINSTER, IN THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND LESLIE M.

Thomas v. Toys" R" US, Inc.

282 N.J. Super. 569 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1995

See Gaido v. Weiser, 227 N.J. … .); Brown v. Mortimer, 100 N.J. Super. 395 , 242 A. 2d 36 (App.Div. 1968) (Witness permitted to testify whose name had not been supplied by filing of timely amendment to interrogatory.)

In Re Fair Hearing

138 N.J. Super. 417 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1976

Sinai Hospital v. Kornegay, 75 Misc. 2d 302 , 347 N.Y.S. 2d 807 (Civ. Ct. 1973); Brooklyn Hospital v. Criss, 76 Misc. 2d 119, 122 , 349 N.Y.S. 2d 488, 491 (Civ. Ct. 1973). … Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N.J. 589, 599 (1965); Mayflower Securities v. Bureau of Securities, 64 N.J. 85, 93 (1973). I vote to affirm.

Karatz v. Scheidemantel

226 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 27, 1988

In case of any flagrant misconduct the board of managers may declare a forfeiture of the time previously remitted, either in whole or in part, as to them shall seem just. … with their health, strength and mental capacity and shall receive such compensation therefor as the State Board shall determine.

Kulish v. HILLSIDE POLICEMEN'S BENEV. ASSOC.

124 N.J. Super. 263 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 1973

Board of Education, Union Beach v. New Jersey Education Assn, 53 N.J. 29, 36 (1968). Peaceful picketing in furtherance of an unlawful purpose is not permissible and will be restrained. … Board of Education, Union Beach, supra, 53 N.J. at 40 .

Mautz v. J.P. Patti Co.

298 N.J. Super. 13 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1997

[Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries, 103 N.J. 177, 192-92 , 510 A.2d 1152 (1986).] … Implied indemnity is obviously disfavored in this context, see Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries, 103 N.J. at 189 , 510 A.2d 1152 , and only express indemnity agreements are deemed efficacious.

State v. DeChristino

235 N.J. Super. 291 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 26, 1989

See State v. Gibson, 156 N.J. … State v.

Beirne v. Gangemi

69 N.J. Super. 220 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 21, 1961

In the case of Daly v. … However, in Dodsworth v.

Mobile Home Village, Inc. v. Mayor of Jackson

269 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 20, 1993

The Township and the Board moved to dismiss plaintiffs appeal after the case of Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 1522 , 118 L.Ed.2d 153 (1992), was decided contrary to the position asserted by plaintiff. … The first, Hall v.

State, in Interest of Jm

103 N.J. Super. 88 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 1968

App. 1967); Marsden v. Commonwealth, 227 N.E. 2 d 1. ( Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct., 1967); State ex rel. LaFollette v. Circuit Court of Brown County, 37 Wis. 2 d 329, 155 N.W. 2 d 141 ( Sup. Ct. 1967). … La Follette v. Circuit Court of Brown County, supra.

Plata v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control

360 N.J. Super. 92 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 6, 2003

The secretary of the municipal Board accepted the application on behalf of the State ABC director. … Cornblatt, P.A. v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218, 231 , 708 A.2d 401 (1998); State, Dep’t of Law & Pub. Safety v. *98 Gonzalez, 142 N.J. 618, 627 , 667 A.2d 684 (1995); Young v.

Windmill Estates, Inc. v. ZONING BD. OF ADJ., TOTOWA

147 N.J. Super. 65 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 1976

In Nigito v. … Co. v. Wenonah Zoning Board of Adj., supra. Neither Closter, Wenonah or Totowa are sprawling townships of sizeable land area, as was Mount Laurel with 22 square miles, or 14,000 acres.

Long v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, CTY. OF HUDSON

16 N.J. Super. 448 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1951

LONG, DECEASED, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 13, 1951. … See Conover v. Stillwell, 34 N.J.L. 54 ( Sup. Ct. 1869); Westmont National Bank v. Payne, 108 N.J.L. 133 ( E. & A. 1931); Levine v. Blumenthal, supra .