Case law

Williams v. State

375 N.J. Super. 485 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 18, 2005

Brown v. Heymann, supra, 62 N.J. at 11 , 297 A. 2d 572 . [ Id. at 449-450, 617 A .2d 223 .] … As stated in Board of Educ. of Tp. of Neptune v. Neptune Tp. Educ.

GRANDAL ENT. v. Borough of Keansburg

292 N.J. Super. 529 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 25, 1996

If it wanted a further reduction it had to file an appeal with the county board of taxation and comply with the time limitations of N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.11 and -63.39. … City of Newark v. Fischer, 8 N.J. at 199 , 84 A. 2d 547 ; see also Boys' Club of Clifton v. Township of Jefferson, 72 N.J. 389, 405 , 371 A. 2d 22 (1977); County of Essex v. City of East Orange, 214 N.J.

Beirne v. Gangemi

69 N.J. Super. 220 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 21, 1961

In the case of Daly v. … However, in Dodsworth v.

State v. Riley

412 N.J. Super. 162 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 2009

Brown and Arana were assigned to defendant's squad at the time, and subject to his general supervision. Brown assisted Currier with the motor vehicle stop. … Rev. at 835-36, 839 n. 123 (describing Congressional concerns over the years with hackers, pirate bulletin boards, stolen passwords, worms and viruses, and terrorists).

Ronade Associates, Inc. v. Department of Conservation & Economic Development

7 N.J. Super. 132 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1950

S. 58 :1-26, the Court of Errors and Appeals in Jersey City v. … Nebbia v. New York, 54 S. Ct. 505 , 291 U. S. 502 , 78 L. Ed. 940 . Cf. Brandon v. Montclair, 124 N. J. L. 135 (Sup. Ct. 1940); affirmed, 125 N. J. L. 367 (E. & A. 1940). Mr. Justice Roberts; in Nebbia v.

In Re Reorganization of Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange of New Jersey

328 N.J. Super. 344 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 2000

In October 1997, MIIX's Board of Governors (Board) sought approval from the Commissioner to convert to a stock insurance company. … Department of Ins. v. Universal Brokerage Corp., 303 N.J.Super. 405, 409 , 697 A. 2d 142 (App.Div.1997) (quoting Dennery v. *31 Board of Educ., 131 N.J. 626, 641 , 622 A. 2d 858 (1993)).

Sheehan v. Sheehan

51 N.J. Super. 276 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 14, 1958

All expenses of tuition, clothing, board and maintenance and all other charges of said boarding school or college (the said children shall have the right to suggest to the Court the college which they wish to attend) while … All expenses of tuition, clothing, board and maintenance and all other charges of boarding school or college for said children are to be paid by defendant. III. Plaintiff is to have certain rights of visitation. IV.

Costanzo v. NJ RACING COMM.

126 N.J. Super. 187 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1974

of Stewards." [2] See Martin v. … Compare Martin v. Monmouth Park Jockey Club, 145 F.

CARROLL EX REL. CARROLL v. Boyce

272 N.J. Super. 384 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 12, 1994

Property Liability Guaranty Assoc. v. Brown, 174 N.J. … Co. v. Tilley, 280 F.

Hrycak v. Kiernan

367 N.J. Super. 237 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 2004

Cohen v. Radio-Elecs. Officers Union, 146 N.J. 140, 155 , 679 A.2d 1188 (1996); Gruhin & Gruhin, P.A v. Brown, 338 N.J.Super. 276, 280 , 768 A.2d 822 (App.Div.2001). … See Gruber & Colabella, P.A. v.

Prickett v. Prickett's Administrators

20 N.J. Eq. 478 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1869

payment for such services, and no circumstances are shown from *480 which, such understanding can he fairly inferred, the child cannot recover compensation for such services; nor, on the other hand, can the parent recover for board … Ridgway’s Ex’r v. English, 2 Zab. 409; Updike v. Titus, 2 Beas. 151; Updike v. Tenbroeck, 3 Vroom 105 .

Windmill Estates, Inc. v. ZONING BD. OF ADJ., TOTOWA

147 N.J. Super. 65 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 1976

In Nigito v. … Co. v. Wenonah Zoning Board of Adj., supra. Neither Closter, Wenonah or Totowa are sprawling townships of sizeable land area, as was Mount Laurel with 22 square miles, or 14,000 acres.

Levine v. Mayor of Passaic

233 N.J. Super. 559 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1988

[State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415 (1956); emphasis supplied]. If the language is clear, the court may not ignore it in its construction process. Bravand v. Neeld, 35 N.J.Super. 42 (App.Div.1955). … Inganamort v.

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. State

246 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 1991

Tea Co. v. … Board of Review, 8 N.J.Super. 71 , 73 A.2d 262 (App.Div.1950) and Gerber v.

G. v. C.

172 N.J. Super. 123 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 12, 1978

N.J.S.A. 9:17-20 permits “any person charged as the reputed father ... or the *127 State Board of Child Welfare or the county welfare board or any municipality aggrieved to appeal an adverse determination. … See Montclair v. Stanoyevich, 6 N.J. 479, 484 (1951); Steiner v. Stein, 2 N.J. 367 , 378 379 (1949); Peterson v. Albano, 158 N.J.Super. 503 (App.Div.1978).

State v. Bonano

113 N.J. Super. 210 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1971

In State v. Brown, 22 N. … Brown v. United States, 256 U. S. 335, 343 , 41 S. Ct. 501, 502 , 65 L. Ed. 961, 963 (1921).

Bogert v. Washington Twp.

45 N.J. Super. 13 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 1957

Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment, supra [ 9 N.J. 405 ]; Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N.J. 200 (1949). … Guaclides v. Borough of Englewood Cliffs, 11 N.J. Super. 405, 415 ( App. Div. 1951); Board of County Commissioners, etc. v. Snyder, 186 Md. 342 , 46 A. 2 d 689 ( Ct. App. 1946).

Higher Breed Nj LLC v. the City of Burlington Common Council

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 3, 2026

"To accomplish that goal, the MLUL delegates power to three municipal agencies—the governing body, the planning board, and the zoning board of adjustment . . . that work to develop, enforce, and grant relief from the municipality … Div. 2000) (remanding because "the resolution adopted by the Zoning Board [was] woefully inadequate"); see also New N.Y. SMSA, Ltd. P'ship v. Bd. of Adjustment of Weehawken, 370 N.J. Super. 319, 335 (App.

Catalane v. Gilian Instrument

271 N.J. Super. 476 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1994

Plaintiff went on a business trip and when he returned, Ohlhoff and Browne had selected two candidates, a male and a female, for him to interview. … Plaintiff hired the female candidate, after Lalin, Ohlhoff, and Browne also agreed.

Moore v. Conover

123 N.J. Eq. 61 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 21, 1937

Story v. Jersey City and Bergen Plank Road Co., 1 C.E. Gr. 14; The State, Warren Railroad Co., pros. , v. Person, 3 Vr. 134 , 566; Tomlinson v. Jessup, 15 Wall. 454; Miller v. The State, 15 Wall. 478 ." … In Union Pacific Railroad Co. v.