Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.26s

  • Ocean County Utilities Authority v. Planning Board

    221 N.J. Super. 621 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1987

    Chester Tp. v. … In Ringlieb v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Maxfield v. Board of Education of Ridgewood

    217 N.J. Super. 267 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 5, 1986

    We held in Maxfield v. Board of Education of the Township of Ridgewood, Docket No. … Isserman v. Isserman, 2 N.J. 1 (1949); Oswald v. Seidler, 138 N.J.Eq. 440 (E. & A.1944); Wemple v. B.F. Goodrich Co., 127 N.J.Eq. 333 (E. & A.1940); Briggs v. Pennsylvania R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown Boveri, Inc. v. Township Committee of North Brunswick

    160 N.J. Super. 179 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 1, 1978

    See Tullo v. … See Moriarty v. Pozner, supra, 21 N. J. at 210; Value Oil Co. v. Irvington, 152 N. J. Super. 354, 366-367 (Law Div. 1977); Abramson v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 143 Conn. 211 , 120 A. 2d 827, 828-829 (Sup. Ct.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bound Brook Board of Education v. Glenn Ciripompa

    442 N.J. Super. 515 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 2015

    A-2198-14T1 BOUND BROOK BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, October 29, 2015 v. … board.

    Reversed by Bound Brook Board of Education v. Glenn Ciripompa (076905), 228 N.J. 4 (2017)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mulcahy v. Bergen County Board of Elections

    156 N.J. Super. 429 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1978

    Super. 429 (1978) 383 A.2d 1214 JAMES MULCAHY, PLAINTIFF, v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, MIMI SARTHOU, SUPERINTENDENT OF ELECTIONS OF BERGEN COUNTY, CARL R. … Consequently, the Bergen County Board of Elections was unable to and did not certify a winner.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Toll Bros., Inc. v. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS

    388 N.J. Super. 103 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 18, 2006

    Twp. of Dover v. … In short, plaintiff's claim against the Board lacks sufficient merit to warrant any further discussion, and summary judgment was properly granted to the Board. V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ml, Inc. v. Edison Township Board of Education

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 2025

    A-0179-25 16 See D'Agostino v. Maldonado, 216 N.J. 168, 182-83 (2013) (citing Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. … The Board therefore did not act arbitrarily or unreasonably given the sequence of events and circumstances.5 V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hagaman v. Board of Education of Woodbridge

    117 N.J. Super. 446 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 14, 1971

    Eq. 397, 401 (Ch. 1944); Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cumberland County v. Buck, 79 N. J. … Shuster v. Board of Education, Hardwick Tp., supra, 17 N. J. Super. at 359; Board of Education, West Paterson v. Brophy, supra, 90 N. J. Eq. at 62; Sunshine Park, Inc. v. Gulvin, 21 N. J.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lourdes Medical Center v. Board of Review

    394 N.J. Super. 446 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 2007

    Admin, v. … Dep’t of Employment & Training, 147 Vt. 525 , 520 A.2d 602, 604 (1986); Browning-Ferris, Inc., supra, 438 A.2d at 1364-65 ; Hertz Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • La Fronz v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION

    164 N.J. Super. 5 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1978

    Super. 5 (1978) 395 A.2d 538 THOMAS LA FRONZ AND WEEHAWKEN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Crifasi v. Oakland Governing Body, 156 N.J. Super. 182 (App. Div. 1978).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Suruda v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

    167 N.J. Super. 331 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1979

    Super. 331 (1979) 400 A.2d 860 WILLIAM SURUDA, BEATRICE BAILEY AND DOMINICK PUGLIESE, PLAINTIFFS, v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided March 9, 1979. *332 Mr. … It is established that legal fees in connection with the defense of a challenge to board membership are within the *334 ambit of N.J.S.A. 18A:12-20. Jones v. Kolbeck, 119 N.J. Super. 299 (App.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Township of Dover v. Board of Adjustment

    149 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 1977

    Garrou v. Teaneck Tryon Co., 11 N. J. 294 (1953); Walker v. Stanhope, 23 N. J. 657 (1957). … In Ferry v. Williams, 41 N. J. L. 332 (Sup.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fallone Properties, L.L.C. v. Bethlehem Township Planning Board

    369 N.J. Super. 552 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 2004

    Fred McDowell, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Township of Wall, 334 N.J.Super. 201, 212 , 757 A.2d 822, 828 (App.Div.2000), certif. denied, 167 N.J. 88 , 769 A.2d 1051 (2001); Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. … Fallone Properties, L.L.C. v. Township of Bethlehem and Bethlehem Township Planning Board, Docket No.: HNT-L-310-79 (the Ordinance Case).

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Donnelly v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    91 N.J. Super. 302 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1966

    Super. 302 (1966) 220 A.2d 117 EUGENE DONNELLY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted May 23, 1966. … The decision of the State Parole Board is affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Glover v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    271 N.J. Super. 420 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 24, 1994

    See, e.g., State v. Jurcsek, 247 N.J.Super. 102 , 588 A.2d 875 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 126 N.J. 333 , 598 A.2d 891 (1991). … The administrative determination of the Parole Board here appealed from is reversed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vedutis v. South Plainfield Board of Education

    142 N.J. Super. 492 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1976

    The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Demos, which was approved in Rost v. Fair Lawn Bd. of Ed., 137 N. J. Super. 76 (App. Div. 1975).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sayreville Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

    193 N.J. Super. 424 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 12, 1984

    relied on Biancardi v. … In Spiewak v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • E.S., ETC. VS. BRUNSWICK INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (L-0727-17, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 27, 2021

    See Hayes v. … In Aguas v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DiMattia v. New Jersey Merit System Board

    325 N.J. Super. 368 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 4, 1999

    Cannuscio v. … See State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barrett v. Monmouth County Board of Elections

    307 N.J. Super. 403 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 1997

    It is urged that the decision in Gramlich v. Cottrell, 204 N.J.Super. 490 , 499 A.2d 275 (Law Div.1985) mandates the 27 votes not be counted; the court does not agree. In Gramlich v. … In Sharrock v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.