Case law

Emerick v. Teaneck Board of Education

221 N.J. Super. 456 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 9, 1987

Defendant appeals from a decision of Judge Huot in the Chancery Division directing defendant Teaneck Board of Education (Board) to comply with a settlement agreement and pay plaintiff the full agreed amount of $38,350, without … Knuckles v. C.I.R., 349 F.2d 610, 612-613 (10th Cir.1965); Agar v. C.I.R., 290 F.2d 283, 284 (2d Cir.1961); Villaume v. United States, 616 F.Supp. 185, 187-188 (D.Minn.1985).

Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning Board

405 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 2009

Shapiro v. … See Kruvant v.

Board of Educ. v. Education Ass'n

270 N.J. Super. 444 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1994

Ass'n v. Ridgefield Park Bd. of Educ., 78 N.J. 144, 154 , 393 A. 2d 278 (1978); Harsen v. Board of Educ., 132 N.J. Super. 365, 371 , 333 A. 2d 580 (Law Div. 1975); Communications Workers v. … In the seminal case of Board of Educ. v. Bernards Tp. Educ.

Jenkins v. Newark Board of Education

166 N.J. Super. 300 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1979

Palitto v. Board of Review

312 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 1998

Claimant Karen Palitto appeals from a determination of the Appeal Tribunal, affirmed by the Board of Review, denying her application for disability benefits on the ground that since she was employed by her husband, her employment … The Appeal Tribunal and Board of Review construed that exclusion as absolute and unconditional. It is neither.

Puntasecca v. Violent Crimes Compensation Board

214 N.J. Super. 368 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 1986

See White v. Violent Crimes Compensation Board, 76 N.J. 368, 386 (n. 5) (1978). … Berko v.

Board of Education v. Board of Education of Greater Egg Harbor Regional High School District

188 N.J. Super. 92 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 1982

Two Guys from Harrison, Inc. v. Furman, 32 N.J. 199, 205 (1960). … Humble Oil and Refining Co. v. Wojtycha, 48 N.J. 562 (1967). Affirmed.

Shanahan v. State Board of Education

133 N.J. Super. 34 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 1975

Shanahan appealed the decision to the State Board of Education insofar as it overruled the 1972 Watchung holding. The State Board affirmed. It concluded that since, pursuant to N. J. S. … Shanahan v. N. J. State Bd. of Education, 118 N. J. Super. 212 (App. Div. 1972). We do not read our opinion in Shanahan to suggest that the provisions of N. J. S.

Karam v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

102 N.J. Super. 291 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 1968

Presbyterian Church, etc. v. Div. of Alcoholic Bev. Con., 53 N. J. Super. 271, 279 (App. … However, the West Orange Board did not view the matter as quite that simple.

Maggio v. Sussex County Welfare Board

29 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1953

The County Court held that the board’s judgment should be first satisfied from the proceeds of the sale. … They cite Camden County Welfare Board v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 1 N. J. Super. 532 (Ch. Div. 1948).

Jenkins v. Newark Board of Education

166 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 12, 1979

In Polillo v. … Regional High School Bd. of Ed., supra ; Dunn v. Laurel Springs, supra; Oliveri v. Carlstadt East Rutherford Bd. of Ed., 160 N.J. Super. 131 (App. Div. 1978); see Accardi v. North Wildwood, supra . Cf.

Kimberline v. Planning Board of Camden

73 N.J. Super. 80 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1962

An examination of the record of the proceedings before the planning board shows a compliance with the statutory requirements as set forth in Wilson v. … In Wilson v.

Trauma Nurses, Inc. v. Board of Review

242 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1990

See Provident Inst. for Sav. in Jersey City v. Div. of Employ. Sec., 32 N.J. 585, 590 , 161 A. 2d 497 (1960); Bogue Electric Co. v. Board of Review, 21 N.J. 431, 435 , 122 A. 2d 615 (1956); Gilchrist v. … Co. v.

Dilts v. Franklin Township Planning Board

272 N.J. Super. 253 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1993

Plaintiffs have overcome the presumption of validity accorded to local Boards in the decision-making process as set forth in Kramer v. Bd. of Adjustment of Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 286 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965); Ardolino v. … Florham Park Bd. of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 105 , 130 A.2d 847 (1957); and Kessler v. Bowker, 174 N.J.Super. 478, 486 , 417 A.2d 34 (App.Div.1979).

Van Allen v. Board of Commissioners

197 N.J. Super. 443 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 31, 1984

Fredericks v. Board of Health, 82 N.J.L. 200 (Sup.Ct.1912). … West Milford Planning Board v. West Milford, 123 N.J.Super. 135 (Law Div.1973). It may have concluded that good tax collectors may be found more readily if they have the right to regulate their own hours.

Booker v. New Jersey State Parole Board

265 N.J. Super. 191 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1993

In Booker v. New Jersey State Parole Board, A-3724-91T3, and in Fitzpatrick v. New Jersey State Parole Board, A-4982-91T3, the determinations of the New Jersey State Parole Board are affirmed. In Nelson v. … Evans v. New Jersey State Parole Board, A- *197 1940-92T2; Secor v. New Jersey State Parole Board, A-4810-90T4 (which may be moot due to the petitioner's release on parole), and Amiditis v.

Jason Corp. v. Board of Adjustment

16 N.J. Super. 463 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 29, 1951

On March 16, 1951, plaintiff appealed to the board of adjustment and, after a public hearing, the board sustained the action of the building inspector. *465 The building inspector and the board of adjustment were of the opinion … See Guttman v. Borough of Bradley Beach, 15 N. J. Super. 409 (App. Div. 1951).

Burcam Corp. v. Planning Board of Medford

160 N.J. Super. 258 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 26, 1978

Skulski v. Nolan, 68 N. J. 179, 202 (1975). There is no expressed intention here. Accordingly, I hold that the 45-day periods provided in the statute are to run consecutively and not concurrently. … Roselle v. Wright, 37 N. J. Super. 507 (Law Div. 1955), aff’d 31 N. J. 400 (1956).

Chrinko v. South Brunswick Township Planning Board

77 N.J. Super. 594 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1963

Judicial decisions striking down zoning ordinances because they constitute spot zoning and by-pass the board of adjustment deal with single parcels or limited areas. Conlon v. Bd. of Public Works, Paterson, 11 N. … Pull consideration by the planning board within less than 30 days suffices to meet the statute. Wollen v. Ft. Lee, 27 N. J. 408, 417 (1958); Vickers Tp. v. Gloucester Tp., 37 N. J. 232, 252 (1962).

J.H. v. Warren Hills Board of Education

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 28, 2025

Musker v. Suuchi, Inc., 260 N.J. 178, 185 (2025); Allstate N.J. Ins. Co. v. Lajara, 222 N.J. 129, 139 (2015). … Adm'rs v.