Case law

Burns v. Hoboken Rent Leveling & Stabilization Board

429 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 2013

See Arena v. … See Biddle v.

Urso & Brown, Inc. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAX.

353 N.J. Super. 248 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 2002

Super. 248 URSO & BROWN, INC., Predecessor to Al Gar/The Display Connection, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant-Respondent. … The Tax Court, in a published opinion, Urso & Brown, Inc. v.

Di Miceli v. State Parole Board

29 N.J. Super. 80 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 1953

Super. 80 (1953) 101 A.2d 580 ROSARIO DI MICELI, APPELLANT, v. STATE PAROLE BOARD, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted December 14, 1953. … Zink v. Lear, 28 N.J. Super. 515 ( App. Div. 1953); White v. Parole Board, 17 N.J. Super. 580 ( App. Div. 1952).

Thomas v. Teaneck Board of Education

184 N.J. Super. 443 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 1982

Bishop v. City of San Jose, 1 Cal.3d 56 , 460 P.2d 137 , 81 Cal.Rptr. 465 (Sup.Ct.1969); City of Joplin v. Industrial Comm’n of Missouri, 329 S.W.2d 687 (Mo.Sup.Ct. 1959); Bradley v. … Casey, 415 Ill. 576 , 114 N.E.2d 681 (Sup.Ct. 1953); see, also, City of Monmouth v. Lorenz, 30 Ill.2A 60, 195 N.E.2d 661 (Sup.Ct.1964).

East Orange Board of Educ. v. Scc

405 N.J. Super. 132 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 2009

Super. 132 EAST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY SCHOOLS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and The New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Defendants-Respondents. No. … Promissory Estoppel The Board also argues that it should prevail under the doctrine of promissory *875 estoppel, relying on Lobiondo v.

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

146 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 1977

Amato v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

240 N.J. Super. 313 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 23, 1990

See Blasi v. … See State v. Gill, 47 N.J. 441, 444 , 221 A.2d 521 (1966); Galanter v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Howell, 211 N.J.Super. 218, 221 , 511 A.2d 702 (App.Div.1986).

J.I. v. New Jersey State Parole Board

441 N.J. Super. 564 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 11, 2015

In contrast, in State v. … V. J.I. contends that the Board violated his right to due process by denying him discovery and a hearing.

Cohen v. Emerson Board of Education

225 N.J. Super. 324 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1988

See Hill v. Bd. of Ed., West Orange, 1985 S.L.D.-(Commissioner, January 16, 1985), aff’d by St. Bd. of Ed., 1985 S.L.D.-(May 1,1985), aff’d App.Div. 1986 (A-4355-84T1), certif. den. 104 N.J. 443 (1986); contra Felper v. … Gibbons v. Gibbons, 86 N.J. 515, 521-523 (1981) (as to statutes); Essex Cty. Welfare Bd. v. Klein, 149 N.J.Super. 241, 247 (App.Div. 1977) (equating administrative regulations with statutes for construction purposes).

Cumberland County Welfare Board v. Roberts

148 N.J. Super. 456 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1977

McGee v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST AMWELL

416 N.J. Super. 602 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 2010

Citing Cummings v. … See, e.g., Wilson v. Brown, 404 N.J.Super. 557, 563 , 962 A. 2d 1122 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 198 N.J. 473 , 968 A. 2d 1189 (2009) (considering an OPRA request for e-mails); Fisher v.

Jenkins v. Newark Board of Education

166 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 12, 1979

In Polillo v. … Regional High School Bd. of Ed., supra ; Dunn v. Laurel Springs, supra; Oliveri v. Carlstadt East Rutherford Bd. of Ed., 160 N.J. Super. 131 (App. Div. 1978); see Accardi v. North Wildwood, supra . Cf.

Kimberline v. Planning Board of Camden

73 N.J. Super. 80 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1962

An examination of the record of the proceedings before the planning board shows a compliance with the statutory requirements as set forth in Wilson v. … In Wilson v.

Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board

296 N.J. Super. 437 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 1997

State Parole Bd. v. … Jenkins v. Fauver, supra; Dominique v. Weld, 73 F.3d 1156 (1st Cir.1996); O’Neal v.

Fisher v. New Jersey State Parole Board

303 N.J. Super. 229 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1997

Smith v. Angelone, 111 F.3d 1126, 1131 (4th Cir.1997); Anderson v. Singletary, 111 F.3d 801, 806 (11th Cir.1997); United States v. Simmonds, 111 F.3d 737, 744 (10th Cir.1997); Naddi v. … VI, sec. 5, para. 4 (1947)) the Board’s actions are *239 always judicially reviewable for arbitrariness.” Monks v. N.J.

Dilts v. Franklin Township Planning Board

272 N.J. Super. 253 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1993

Plaintiffs have overcome the presumption of validity accorded to local Boards in the decision-making process as set forth in Kramer v. Bd. of Adjustment of Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 286 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965); Ardolino v. … Florham Park Bd. of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 105 , 130 A.2d 847 (1957); and Kessler v. Bowker, 174 N.J.Super. 478, 486 , 417 A.2d 34 (App.Div.1979).

Van Allen v. Board of Commissioners

197 N.J. Super. 443 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 31, 1984

Fredericks v. Board of Health, 82 N.J.L. 200 (Sup.Ct.1912). … West Milford Planning Board v. West Milford, 123 N.J.Super. 135 (Law Div.1973). It may have concluded that good tax collectors may be found more readily if they have the right to regulate their own hours.

Concord Garden Apartments v. Board of Adjustment

1 N.J. Super. 301 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 1949

Taylor v. Hackensack, 137 N.J.L. 139 (Sup.Ct. 1948 ); Appley v. Bernards Township, *Page 305 128 N.J.L. 195 (Sup.Ct. 1942); affirmed, 129 N.J.L. 73 (E. A. 1942). … Rohrs v. Zabriskie, 102 N.J.L. 473 (Sup.Ct. 1926 ); Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N.J. Misc. 489 (Sup.Ct. 1928). As Mr. Justice Perskie pertinently stated in the case of Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc., v. Mt.

Cirangle v. Maywood Board of Education

164 N.J. Super. 595 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 2, 1979

Super. 595 (1979) 397 A.2d 400 LOUIS CIRANGLE, PLAINTIFF, v. MAYWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-COUNTERCLAIMANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided January 2, 1979. *597 Mr. William F. … Since Cirangle waived this statutory right, the board was required to consider the charges against him in public. See Rice v. Union City Reg'l High School Bd. of Ed., 155 N.J. Super. 64 (App.

Clark v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

125 N.J. Super. 340 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1973

A. 30 :8-19, which vests in the Board “the custody, rule, keeping and charge of the county jails.” The Board argues that authority for the action taken by it is to be found in Caldaro v. Ferber, 39 N. J. 314 (1963). … We have no occasion to resolve, since the issue is not before us, whether Civil Service Rule 53 (1), as construed in Caldaro v.