Case law

J.B. v. New Jersey State Parole Board

433 N.J. Super. 327 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 26, 2013

NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. _______________________________ B.M., Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. _______________________________ L.A., Appellant, v. … NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. _______________________________ W.M., Appellant, v.

Oughton v. Board of Fire Commissioners

178 N.J. Super. 565 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1981

Judge Haines was persuaded that the philosophy expressed by the court in Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk, 33 N.J. 162 (1960) and Sarner v. … Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk, supra, at 168. That underscores the limitation on our authority to award counsel fees.

Green v. Simpson & Brown Const. Co.

24 N.J. Super. 422 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 1953

Super. 422 (1953) 94 A.2d 693 ANNIE GREEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SIMPSON & BROWN CONSTRUCTION CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLEE. Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division. … Applying the tests given in the Hardt v.

Board of Education v. Township Committee

187 N.J. Super. 540 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1983

It is clear that a board has an obligation to account for surplus funds and investment income in planning its budget for the ensuing year. Cf. Fair Lawn Bd. of Ed. v. … Its action is, of course, subject to review by the Commissioner and by the State Board for “procedural or substantive arbitrariness.’’ East Brunswick Tp. Bd. of Ed. v.

Ferraro v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

228 N.J. Super. 33 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1988

Plaintiffs obviously assumed that Holmdel had retained the power to zone and therefore applied for a variance before the Holmdel Board of Adjustment. … Therefore, under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70, a variance would be heard by the board of adjustment of the supervising municipality, rather than that of the municipality where the property was located.

J.B. v. New Jersey State Parole Board

444 N.J. Super. 115 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 2016

Doe v. … Clowes v.

Moresh v. Bayonne Board of Education

52 N.J. Super. 105 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1958

SINGER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … As held in Lascari v. Board of Education of Lodi, 36 N.J. Super. 426 ( App. Div. 1955), and Lange v. Board of Education of Audubon, 26 N.J. Super. 83 ( App.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State

311 N.J. Super. 587 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 1998

Von Ouhl v. Board of Review

254 N.J. Super. 147 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1992

N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(l); see Lowden v. Board of Review, 78 N.J.Super. 467 , 189 A. 2d 224 (App.Div.1963). … jurisdiction upon the Board to review any other part. 11 N.J.Super. at 328 , 78 A.2d 306 ; compare Ludwigsen v.

Egeland v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

405 N.J. Super. 329 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 2009

Wilson v. Brick Twp. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 405 N.J.Super. 189, 197 , 963 A.2d 1208 (App.Div.2009) (citing Wyzykowski v. Rizas, 132 N.J. 509, 518-520 , 626 A.2d 406 (1993)). … In Metzdorf v. Borough of Rumson, 67 N.

Oughton v. Board of Fire Commissioners

178 N.J. Super. 633 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 22, 1980

That decision, reported in Oughton v. Board of Fire Comm’rs, 168 N. J.Super. 434 (Law Div.1979), was appealed. … The statement accompanying the initial amendatory bill expressly set forth its intention “to nullify the primary effects” of Oughton v. Board of Fire Comm’rs.

Waskevitz v. Clifton Paper Board Co.

7 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1950

PALLITTO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. CLIFTON PAPER BOARD COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 20, 1950. … See Wettstein v. Whitall-Tatum Co., supra; Elliott v. Industrial Accident Commission, supra ; Capital Transit Co. v. Hoage, 84 F. 2d 235, 236 ( Cir. D.C. 1936). The judgment of the County Court is affirmed.

Ehehalt v. Livingston Board of Education

147 N.J. Super. 511 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 17, 1977

Super. 511 (1977) 371 A.2d 752 CALVIN EHEHALT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. LIVINGSTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted February 8, 1977. … His separate calling is not an integral part of respondent's regular function as a school board.

Davis v. Violent Crimes Compensation Board

145 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 1976

Appellant contends that the Board misapplied the law to the evidence in the case. … However, we find that the decision of the Board is supported by the evidence in the record and was within the discretion accorded by statute to the Board. See N. J. S. A. *340 52:4B-10. N. J. S.

K.L. v. Evesham Township Board of Education

423 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 2011

Accord Roe v. … Its provisions are not applicable to the Board’s actions in this case. See Cruz v.

Garner v. Mountainside Board of Adjustment

212 N.J. Super. 417 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1986

In Coles v. … In Alamo Heights v.

Fusco v. Board of Educ. of Newark

349 N.J. Super. 455 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 2002

Super. 455 Lester FUSCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, Defendant-Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 13, 2002. … See Cummings, supra, 295 N.J.Super. at 388 , 685 A. 2d 60 ; see also Morey v.

Redding v. Burlington County Welfare Board

123 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1973

Thus, in King v. Smith, 392 U. S. 309 , 88 S. Ct. 2128 , 20 L. … In Woolfolk v.

Van Sickle v. Board of Review

372 N.J. Super. 460 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 2004

Finally, in Horn v. … On this latter point, subsequent United States Supreme Court decisions in Board of County Comm’rs, Wabaunsee County v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668 , 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996), and O'Hare Truck Serv., Inc. v.

Brown v. Port Authority Police Superior Officers Ass'n

283 N.J. Super. 122 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 1995

Plaintiffs Donald Brown and Joseph Smith 1 are retired former employees of defendant Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. … Auth. v.