Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.79s

  • Pasetti v. Board of Review

    156 N.J. Super. 296 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 17, 1978

    The Board of Beview noted: *298 In the opinion of- the psychiatrist [who examined claimant shortly after the injury], the, claimant’s “attempt to end his life was an impulsive act.” … Provident Inst. for Sav. in Jersey City v. Div. of Employm. Security, 32 N. J. 585, 590 (1960).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marcello v. Board of Review

    90 N.J. Super. 332 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1966

    —deemed a de facto corporation and a covered employer by the Board —but not for a full 17 weeks before she became disabled and had to leave her job. … See Fenwick v. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n, 133 N. J. L. 295 (E. & A. 1945), reversing 132 N. J. L. 185 (Sup. Ct. 1944).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCarthy v. Board of Trustees

    85 N.J. Super. 502 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1964

    The Board of Trastees of the Public Employees’ Betirement System (hereafter Board) refused to pay to Austin L. … Woehr v. Travelers Insurance Co., 134 N. J. Eq. 38, 45 (Ch. 1943); Spina v. Consolidated Police, etc., Pension Fund Com., 41 N. J. 391 (1964). The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • De Rose v. Board of Review

    6 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 1950

    DE ROSE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 9, 1950. Decided January 16, 1950. *165 Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW. Mr. Frank G. … Valenti v. Board of Review, 4 N.J. Super. 162 ( App. Div. 1949). Affirmed with costs.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Goldstein v. Lincoln Park Planning Board

    52 N.J. Super. 44 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 16, 1958

    Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 103 (1957). … Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, supra, 24 N.J. at page 103 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pappas v. Board of Adjustment

    254 N.J. Super. 52 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1992

    Hughes v. Washington, 389 U.S. 290, 298 , 88 S.Ct. 438, 443 , 19 L.Ed.2d 530, 536 (1967) (Stewart, J., concurring). In Sheerr v. … In Morris County Land v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Welch v. Board of Education

    159 N.J. Super. 29 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1978

    But school boards are not identical to municipalities, and are not subject to the same constraints. Atlantic Comm. College v. Civil Service Common, 59 N. J. 102, 110 (1971); Gulano v. Elizabeth School Dist. … Mayflower Securities v. Bureau of Securities, 64 N. J. 85, 93 (1973); Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Ed., 139 N. J. Super. 175, 177 (App. Div. 1976), aff’d o. b. 73 N. J. 37 (1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patuto v. Board of Review

    82 N.J. Super. 154 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 24, 1964

    Particular reliance is placed on Hancock v. Board of Review, 46 N. J. Super. 418, 421 (App. … Alexander Hamilton Hotel Corp. v. Board of Review, 127 N. J. L. 184 (Sup. Ct. 1941). The court’s duty is to construe a statute and not to write into it conditions or qualifications. That is a legislative function.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Conroy v. Hudson County Board

    37 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 1955

    Tally v. Board of Education, Hoboken, 10 N. … De Vita v. Housing Authority of City of *235 Paterson, 17 N. J. 350, 355 (1955); Davaillon v. Elizabeth, 121 N. J. L. 380, 386 (Sup. Ct. 1938); Browne v. Hagen, 91 N. J. L. 544 (E. & A. 1918).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Health v. Pinto

    108 N.J. Super. 349 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1970

    Earruso v. Board of Health, E. Hanover Tp., 120 N. J. L. 463, 469 (Sup. Ct. 1938). In that case a board of health ordinance regulating the dumping of garbage was upheld as valid. … Ct. 1906), upholding a city ordinance limiting the use of public streets for collection of garbage, with Board of Health, Weehawken Tp. v. New York Central R. Co., 4 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schultz v. Board of Education

    105 N.J. Super. 165 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 1969

    In the latter part of 1966 petitioner applied to respondent board of education of Wanaque (hereinafter local board) to have the Bulletin exclusively used in the publication of notices of the local board. … Mont esano v. Liberty Warehouse Co., 121 N. J. L. 124, 125 (E. & A. 1938). See also Wildwood, etc., Pub. Co. v. Wildwood, 35 N. J. Super. 543, 547 (Law Div. 1955).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Board of Education

    35 N.J. Super. 82 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1955

    Judson v. Peoples Bank and Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N. J. 67 (1954). … The appellants’ argument that the failure to make full disclosure to the public of all facts within the knowledge of the local board of education voids the referendum is based upon the ruling in Driscoll v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McLaughlin v. Board of Review

    7 N.J. Super. 12 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1950

    This is an appeal from the decision of iho Board of Eeview of the Unemployment Compensation Commission. Claimant testified that he was a night club entertainer. … Thereupon, claimant appealed to the Board of Review, which affirmed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal. This appeal followed. R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scarpa v. Board of Review

    4 N.J. Super. 336 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 1949

    Plaintiff appealed this decision to the Board of Review, which affirmed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal on the record before such body and for the reasons given by it for its determination.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Probst v. Board of Education

    249 N.J. Super. 222 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 21, 1991

    Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 561 , 362 A.2d 13 (1976). … Ass’n v. Bd. of Educ., 96 N.J. 587, 595 , 476 A.2d 1245 (1984); Cordasco v. Bd. of Educ. of City of East Orange, 205 N.J.Super. 407, *230 411 , 501 A.2d 171 (App.Div.1985).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wagner v. Board of Trustees

    290 N.J. Super. 146 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 9, 1996

    Charlotte Wagner (Wagner) appeals from the final determination of the Board of Trustees of the Teachers’ Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) denying her request for retired status death benefits related to the death of her sister … In support of his decision, the ALJ determined that the provisions of N.J.S.A 18A:66-47 requiring that an applicant survive for 30 days beyond the effective retirement date or Board approval of that retirement, whichever

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • JOSE SERRANO VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 14, 2020

    A-0191-18T1 JOSE SERRANO, Appellant, v. … Trantino v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 166 N.J. 113, 173 (2001) (quoting Beckworth v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 359 (1973)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Jamison v. Board of Education

    171 N.J. Super. 549 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 1979

    In both its answer and its motion the Board cited Hinfey v. Matawan Bd. of Ed., 77 N.J. 514 (1978), as authority for its request to transfer. … The Board’s definition of the issue is spurious. Qualifications certainly would be relevant to the issue of race discrimination, but that is not the issue itself. Cf. Peper v. Princeton Univ.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Farkas v. Middlesex Board of Freeholders

    49 N.J. Super. 363 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 24, 1958

    Super. 363 (1958) 139 A.2d 779 JOSEPH FARKAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Essex Public Road Board, 39 N.J.L. 291 ( E. & A. 1877), where the road board was held to be without "shadow of authority" to do what it did, viz., substitute in lieu of payment the erection of a new dam in place of the plaintiff's

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Handelson v. Board of Trustees

    193 N.J. Super. 223 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1984

    She found that petitioner had not received it and that the Division most likely had sent the materials to the board. … Davis v. Heil, 132 N.J.Super. 283, 293 (App.Div. 1975), aff’d 68 N.J. 423 (1975). We find support for our conclusion in Zigmont v. Teachers’ Pension, Etc., Fund Trustees, 91 N.J. 580 (1983).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.