Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.97s
216 N.J. Super. 403 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 1987
CONNELL, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 23, 1987. … In sum, we find the action of the board to be supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and in keeping with the applicable statutes and legislative policies. See Campbell v.
Cited 2 timesPublished239 N.J. Super. 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1989
In reviewing the action of the board, the court is limited to an examination of the record below. Kempner v. Edison Tp. 54 N.J.Super. 408 , 149 A.2d 251 (App.Div.1959); Green Acres of Verona, Inc. v. … In this reexamination the court ought not to substitute its discretion for that of the board, nor does it have the power to do so. Kramer v. Sea Girt Bd. of Adj., 45 N.J. 268 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965); Ward v.
Cited 3 timesPublished49 N.J. Super. 74 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1958
Claimant appeals from a decision of the Board of Beview, raising a question involving the construction of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Claimant was laid off by his employer on September 29, 1956. … Lane v. Holderman, 23 N. J. 304, 322 (1957); Walsh v. Dept. of Civil Service, 32 N. J. Super. 39, 48 (App. Div. 1954).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCastellano v. Linden Board of Education
158 N.J. Super. 350 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 1978
A sensible rejoinder to the board's otherwise legitimate need for advance planning is found in Green v. … Co. v. Board of Review, 78 N.J. Super. 144 (App. Div. 1963), aff'd 41 N.J. 64 (1963).
Modified on other grounds by Castellano v. Linden Board of Education, 79 N.J. 407 (1979)Cited 23 timesPublishedNew Jersey Property Liability Guaranty Assoc. v. Brown
174 N.J. Super. 629 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 1980
See Neal v. Celina Mutual Ins. Co., 522 S.W.2d 179 (Ky.1975). … Company v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedColantoni v. Board of Education
329 N.J. Super. 545 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 2000
Div. v. Director, Div. … Impey v. Board of Educ. of Borough of Shrewsbury, 142 N.J. 388 , 662 A.2d 960 (1995).
Cited 1 timesPublished82 N.J. Super. 154 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 24, 1964
Particular reliance is placed on Hancock v. Board of Review, 46 N. J. Super. 418, 421 (App. … Alexander Hamilton Hotel Corp. v. Board of Review, 127 N. J. L. 184 (Sup. Ct. 1941). The court’s duty is to construe a statute and not to write into it conditions or qualifications. That is a legislative function.
Cited 0 timesPublished37 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 1955
Tally v. Board of Education, Hoboken, 10 N. … De Vita v. Housing Authority of City of *235 Paterson, 17 N. J. 350, 355 (1955); Davaillon v. Elizabeth, 121 N. J. L. 380, 386 (Sup. Ct. 1938); Browne v. Hagen, 91 N. J. L. 544 (E. & A. 1918).
Cited 0 timesPublished274 N.J. Super. 211 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1994
In Board of Education v. … See Board of Educ. v. Gateway Reg. High Sch.
Cited 1 timesPublishedRicca v. Board of Commissioners
1 N.J. Super. 139 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 27, 1948
Board of Commissioners of Union City, 130 N.J. Law 1 (Sup.Ct. 1943), 30 Atl. (2d) 892 , affirmed 130 N.J. Law 496 (E. A. 1943), 33 Atl. (2d) 872 (drug store); Starkey v. Atlantic City, 132 N.J. … Law 27 (Sup.Ct. 1944), 38 Atl. (2d) 198 (drug store); Amodio v. Board of Commissioners of West New York, 133 N.J. Law 220 (Sup.Ct. 1945), 43 Atl. (2d) 889 (barber shop). Cf. Crawford's Clothes, Inc., v.
Cited 4 timesPublished81 N.J. Super. 90 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 1963
Schoenwiesner v. Board of Review, Division of Employment Security, 44 N. J. Super. 377, 378 (App. *95 Div. 1957). See generally Annotation, 28 A. L. R. 2d 287, 312-315 (1953). … Alexander v. New Jersey Power & Light Co., 21 N. J. 373, 378-79 (1956).
Cited 0 timesPublished16 N.J. Super. 396 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 1951
Cited 0 timesPublishedSoricelli v. BOARD OF REVIEW, & C.
46 N.J. Super. 299 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 20, 1957
V. … Bogue Electric Co. v. Board of Review, 21 N.J. 431, 435 (1956); Campbell Soup Co. v. Board of Review, 13 N.J. 431, 436 (1953).
Cited 13 timesPublishedBrown v. Kennedy Memorial Hospital-University Medical Center
312 N.J. Super. 579 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 1998
Super. 579 Reverend Julius BROWN, General Administrator and Administrator ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Jeannette Clemons, Deceased, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. … In Tirrell v.
Cited 20 timesPublished310 N.J. Super. 147 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 1998
Thereafter, BRSD moved for summary judgment relying on the Law Division’s decision in Marion Alford and Mary Frances Giglio v. The Board of Education of the Buena Regional School District. … Assoc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished232 N.J. Super. 56 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 1989
In its brief the Board of Review relies upon our decision in Lowden v. … See Reid v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCastellucci v. Board of Review
174 N.J. Super. 289 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1980
See Smith v. E. T. L. Enterprises, 155 N.J.Super. 343 (App.Div.1978); St. Vincent’s Hospital v. Finley, 154 N.J.Super. 24 (App.Div. 1977). … Since the remand here we have dealt with the matter at length in Howard v. Board of Review, 173 N.J.Super. 196 (1980), and that determination is conclusively instructive here.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNew Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. Lichtman
32 N.J. Super. 278 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 4, 1954
The power of the State Board of Optometrists to make rules is limited to the statutory authority given them by the Legislature. Abelson’s, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of Optometrists, 5 N. J. 412 (1950). … had treated 15 or 20 union members, of whom perhaps two had told him they had been referred by some one in the union office, who said they would get a discount. *283 Optometry is not a mere trade or craft (Abelson’s, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished136 N.J. Super. 421 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 1975
The Board of Review affirmed, and both claimants appeal. N. J. S. … The decisions of the Board of Review are affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished65 N.J. Super. 57 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1961
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna