Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.29s

  • Fiscor v. Atlantic County Board

    293 N.J. Super. 19 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 19, 1996

    Fiscor, for claims that arose out of an accident that occurred while plaintiff was driving a vehicle owned by defendant Atlantic County Board of Chosen Freeholders. … Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gherardi v. Trenton Board of Education

    53 N.J. Super. 349 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 1958

    GHERARDI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 15, 1958. … Connolloy v. Board of Education of Trenton, 5 N.J. Misc. 39 ( Sup. Ct. 1926). Accordingly, plaintiff is now precluded from an action for damages on account of the delays. A. Kaplen & Son, Ltd. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Silverman v. Board of Education

    136 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 1975

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United Board & Carton Corp. v. Britting

    61 N.J. Super. 340 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 1960

    Super. 340 (1960) 160 A.2d 660 UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM J. BRITTING, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. … Jur., Equity, § 473, p. 327; Medical Fabrics Co. v. D.C. McLintock Co., 12 N.J. Super. 177, 181 ( App. Div. 1951); Casini v. Lupone, 8 N.J. Super. 362 ( Ch. Div. 1950); Tami v. Pikowitz, 138 N.J.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Bove v. Board of Adjustment

    100 N.J. Super. 95 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 1968

    Kramer v. Bd. of Adjust., Sea Girt, 45 N. J. 268, 285 (1965); Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, supra, 24 N. J., at p. 105; Rexon v. Bd. of Adjustment, Haddonfield, 10 N. J. 1, 7 (1952); Schmidt v. … J., at p. 285; Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, supra, 24 N. J., at p. 105; Yahnel v. Bd. of Adjust, of Jamesburg, 79 N. J. Super. 509, 517 (App. Div. 1963), certification denied 41 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.

    127 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 22, 1974

    Super. 93 (1974) 316 A.2d 478 ELOISE BROWN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. GENERAL ANILINE AND FILM CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 13, 1974. … Petitioner Eloise Brown, widow of respondent's employee, Raymond L. Brown, appeals from a dismissal of two dependency claims filed on behalf of herself and her 12-year-old child. The relevant facts are undisputed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Zahn v. Newark Board of Adjustment

    45 N.J. Super. 516 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 1957

    Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 , *521 31 S.Ct. 342, 357 , 55 L.Ed. 389 (1910); Fisher v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Monroe, 143 Conn. 358 , 122 A. 2 d 729 ( Sup. … See Meserole v. Board of Adjustment, City of Dallas, 172 S.W. 2 d 528 ( Tex. Civ. App. 1943).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Francey v. Board of Educ.

    286 N.J. Super. 354 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1996

    Board of Educ. of Manchester, Ocean County v. Raubinger, 78 N.J. … See Mirandi v. Board of Educ. of West Orange, 1989 S.L.D. 3057, 3062; Bodine v. Board of Educ. of Burlington, Burlington County, 1989 S.L.D. 1053, 1058, aff'd by State Bd. of Educ., 1989 S.L.D. 1064.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 75 SPRUCE v. State Board

    382 N.J. Super. 567 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 21, 2005

    Super. 567 75 SPRUCE STREET, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. Chatham Educational Associates, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. New Jersey State Board of Education, Defendant. … Wright v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Karas v. Board of Adjustment

    155 N.J. Super. 39 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 1977

    A. 40:55D-17(a) (2) provides that an appeal may be taken on a final decision of the board of adjustment or planning board if permitted by local ordinance. … The statute and local ordinance specifically states that an appeal may be taken to the governing body which involves an approval of a board of adjustment or planning board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mullen v. Board of Education

    81 N.J. Super. 151 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1963

    (Italics ours) This section was considered in Lowenstein v. Newark Board of Education, 35 N. … Matthews v. Irvington Board of Education, 31 N. J. Super. 292, 296 (App. Div. 1954); R. S. 1:1—1.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. BOARD OF EDUC.

    246 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 19, 1991

    We have no difficulty deferring, as we must, to that sensible interpretation of the encompassing language of the State Board's own regulation. See Metromedia, Inc. v. … Bd. of Educ., et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fernicola v. Board of Review

    335 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 2000

    Super. 523 Giovanni FERNICOLA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent-Respondent, and GFV Inc. t/a La Rosa Ristorante, Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … In Nota v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Borromeo v. Board of Review

    196 N.J. Super. 576 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1984

    This is the holding of Battaglia v. Board of Review, 14 N.J.Super. 24 (App.Div.1951), and Caldwell v. Div. of Unemployment Dis. Ins., 145 N.J.Super. 206 (App.Div.1976). … The Board of Review found that claimant was “fully employed” because he was working between 30 and 40 hours each week.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baylinson v. Board of Commissioners

    282 N.J. Super. 132 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1995

    Vail v. Pan American Corp., 260 N.J.Super. 292, 297 , 616 A.2d 523 (App.Div.1992). … English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 89 , 110 S.Ct. 2270, 2280 , 110 L.Ed.2d 65 (1990); Miller v. Northwest Airlines, 253 N.J.Super. 618 , 602 A.2d 785 (App.Div.1992).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Muller v. Board of Trustees

    316 N.J. Super. 94 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 10, 1998

    In Gable v. … We also reject the Board’s attempt to analogize this case to Mazza v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cressinger v. Board of Education

    256 N.J. Super. 155 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 1992

    In Rubin v. … In Kerwick v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Roth v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.

    49 N.J. Super. 309 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1958

    Simpson & Brown Construction Co., 14 N.J. 66, 69 (1953); Jochim v. Montrose Chemical Co., 3 N.J. 5 (1949); Mergel v. New Jersey Conveyors Corp., supra . … As *320 was said in the case of Panchak v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Connell v. Board of Review

    216 N.J. Super. 403 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 1987

    CONNELL, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 23, 1987. … In sum, we find the action of the board to be supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and in keeping with the applicable statutes and legislative policies. See Campbell v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ciminera v. Board of Review

    319 N.J. Super. 217 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 1999

    And see Bose v. Board of Review, 303 N.J.Super. 619 , 697 A.2d 568 (App.Div.1997), as to the salutary and remedial purposes of the extended-benefits legislation. … See, e.g., Brock v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co., 149 N.J. 378, 383 , 693 A.2d 894 (1997); Board of Educ. v. Neptune Tp. Educ. Ass’n, 144 N.J. 16, 31 , 675 A.2d 611 (1996).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.