Case law

Nissman v. Board of Educ.

272 N.J. Super. 373 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1994

See Chardon v. … .); Delaware State College v.

Nouhan v. Board of Adjustment

392 N.J. Super. 283 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 19, 2007

See Riggs v. Twp. of Long Beach, 109 N.J. 601, 611-12 , 538 A.2d 808 (1988); Willoughby v. Wolfson Group, Inc., 332 N.J.Super. 223, 227-29 , 753 A.2d 162 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 165 N.J. 603 , 762 A.2d 218 (2000). … See Koslow v. Mun. Council of Twp. of Wayne, 52 N.J. 441, 450 , 245 A.2d 729 (1968); Cronin v. Twp. Comm. of Chesterfield Twp., 239 N.J.Super. 611, 618-19 , 571 A.2d 1354 (App.Div.1990).

Gilliland v. Board of Review

298 N.J. Super. 349 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 1997

____” Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Neptune v. … See Young v. Schering Corp., 141 N.J. 16, 25 , 660 A.2d 1153 (1995); Kletzkin v. Borough of Spotswood Bd. of Ed., supra, 136 N.J. at 278 , 642 A.2d 993 .

Donvito v. Board of Education

387 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 9, 2006

Watson v. City of E. Orange, 175 N.J. 442 , 815 A.2d 956 (2003). … Donvito, on the other hand, points to the interpretation of these statutes in Spiewak v. Bd. of Ed. of Rutherford, 90 N.J. 63 , 447 A.2d 140 (1982), and Sayreville Educ. Ass’n v.

Roman v. NJ State Parole Board

104 N.J. Super. 222 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 1969

Super. 222 (1969) 249 A.2d 609 JUAN ROMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 19, 1968. … That matter depends on the reasons assigned in the revocation of parole alone, see Bonomo v. New Jersey State Parole Board, decided simultaneously herewith.

Fromm v. Board of Directors

81 N.J. Super. 138 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 8, 1963

(In this connection, consult State v. Fromm, 65 N. J. … (at page 42) Plaintiff's reliance upon Bedersky v. Policemen’s and Firemen’s Pension Board, above, is misplaced.

Hay v. Board of Review

282 N.J. Super. 117 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1995

Nothing in Fischer v. Board of Review, 123 N.J.Super. 263 , 302 A.2d 530 (App.Div.1973), cited by the Board, suggests a contrary result. … We thus reverse and remand the case to the Board of Review for the entry of an order to that effect. Reversed and remanded.

Cordasco v. Board of Education

205 N.J. Super. 407 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 22, 1985

We agree with the State Board that petition *411 er’s remedy may only be found in the favorable exercise of discretion by the local board. … Ass’n v. Bd. of Educ., 96 N.J. 587 (1984). This decision involved two school teachers whose employment increment had been withheld for a year in which they had taken a sabbatical leave.

J.A. v. Board of Education

318 N.J. Super. 512 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1999

See State v. … of Education directing the local board to give its reasons to the teacher); State v.

Board of Education v. Eckert

361 N.J. Super. 238 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 2003

Paz v. … Prot. v.

Brown v. Jersey Central Power and Light Co.

163 N.J. Super. 179 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 24, 1978

Super. 179 (1978) 394 A.2d 397 DONALD BROWN AND ANNETTE BROWN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GLEN L. … Hereinafter reference will be made to the injured plaintiff Donald Brown only (Brown).

JOHN P. BROWN v. PATRICIA BROWN (L-2367-20, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 2022

APPELLATE DIVISION v. … That is, as the Court recognized in Hawkins v. Harris, 141 N.J. 207, 216 (1995), and later in Loigman v. Twp.

Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp.

60 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 15, 1960

Super. 333 (1960) 159 A.2d 146 BENJAMIN APPLESTEIN, PLAINTIFF, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. MARTHA U. … Co. v.

James v. Board of Trustees

323 N.J. Super. 100 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1999

grounds, relying upon Steinmann v. … As Justice Schreiber wrote for the Court in Young v.

McCoy v. Board of Review

381 N.J. Super. 169 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 7, 2005

Krauss v. A. & M. Karagheusian, Inc., 13 N.J. 447, 457 , 100 A.2d 277 (1953). In particular, McCoy relies on our decision in Tung-Sol Electric, Inc. v. … We also find inapposite Scardina v. Commonwealth of Pa, Unemployment Comp.

Ensslin v. Board of Trustees

311 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1998

See Fiola v. New Jersey Treas. Dept., 193 N.J.Super. 340, 351 , 474 A.2d 23 (App.Div.1984). Cf . Galligan v. … In the absence of any such likelihood, the Board’s decision in this matter must be seen to have been unduly rigid. See Cammarata v.

Zahn v. Newark Board of Adjustment

45 N.J. Super. 516 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 1957

Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 , *521 31 S.Ct. 342, 357 , 55 L.Ed. 389 (1910); Fisher v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Monroe, 143 Conn. 358 , 122 A. 2 d 729 ( Sup. … See Meserole v. Board of Adjustment, City of Dallas, 172 S.W. 2 d 528 ( Tex. Civ. App. 1943).

United Board & Carton Corp. v. Britting

63 N.J. Super. 517 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 12, 1960

Super. 517 (1959) 164 A.2d 824 UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. WILLIAM J. BRITTING, HOWARD V. BRITTING, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. … For a clear statement of this legal principle and the reasons underlying it, see Haut v. Rossbach, 128 N.J. Eq. 77 ( Ch. 1940); National Tile Board Corp. v. Panelboard Mfg. Co., 27 N.J. Super. 348 ( Ch.

Cumberland County Welfare Board v. Jordan

81 N.J. Super. 406 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1963

Compare McLaughlin v. New Jersey Civil Service Commission, 137 N. J. L. 338 (Sup. Ct. 1948), affirmed 1 N. … Campbell v. Department of Civil Service, 39 N. J. 556 (1963). We find no sound basis in law or in fact for disturbing the conclusion reached by the Civil Service Commission. The judgment is affirmed.

D'Elena v. Burlington County Board

203 N.J. Super. 109 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 25, 1985

Under Citizens for Better Ed. v. … Josefowicz v. Porter, 32 N.J.Super. 585, 591 (App.Div.1954). Second, a citizen must show “a lawful, proper and legitimate purpose not adverse to the public interest.” Accident Index Bureau, Inc. v.