Case law

NJ Highway Authority v. Sills

111 N.J. Super. 313 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 29, 1970

Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 89 N.J.L. 24 (Sup. Ct. 1916); O'Gorman & Young v. Phoenix Assurance Co., 105 N.J.L. 642 (E. & A. 1929); City of Newark v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport, 9 Misc. 722 (Sup. … Sutton , Public Service Railway Co., City of Newark v. Public Service, State Board of Milk Control and Jamouneau, supra .

Mackin v. Mackin

37 N.J. Eq. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1883

They are admissible as against themselves, Morris v. Stokes, 21 Ga. 552 ; MeC'aine v. Clarke, 2 Mnrphey, 317; Nussear v. Arnold, 13 S. & R. 323; Burton v. Seott, 3 Rand. 399 ; Brown v. Moore, 6 Yerg. 272 ; Seale v. … Moore for a year from September, 1880, and boarded with him during that period, making the settlements of the rent and board. The testimony of the testamentary witnesses, especially that of Mr.

State v. Leak

128 N.J. Super. 212 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 6, 1974

State v. Wilkerson, 60 N.J. 452, 460 (1972). In these circumstances we will not assume the jury did not heed the judge's instructions to disregard any testimony as to the watch. Clark v. Piccillo, 75 N.J. … See State v. Petrolia, 45 N.J. Super. 230, 233 (App.

State v. Evans

193 N.J. Super. 560 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1984

In Harvey v. … In State v.

Tirpak v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach Bd. of Adjustment

457 N.J. Super. 441 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 2019

The Board also required the Tirpaks to memorialize the condition as a recorded deed restriction. … See, e.g. , *924 City of Wilmington v.

STEPHEN D. PERRY VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)

459 N.J. Super. 186 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 16, 2019

"To a greater degree than is the case with other administrative agencies, the Parole Board's decision-making function involves individualized discretionary appraisals." Id. at 201 (citing Beckworth v. … Aggregation is a "mechanical function" performed by the Board. Curry v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 309 N.J. Super. 66, 71 (App. Div. 1998).

State v. Wilson

335 N.J. Super. 359 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1999

State v. … State v.

State v. Todd

238 N.J. Super. 445 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 1990

Super. 459 , 551 A. 2d 1037 (App.Div. 1989); State v. Brown, 227 N.J. Super. 429, 437-438 , 547 A. 2d 743 (Law Div. 1988); State v. Morales, 224 N.J. Super. 72, 81-83 , 539 A. 2d 769 (Law Div. 1987). … See State v. Brown, 227 N.J. Super. at 441 , 547 A. 2d 743 .

Apache Auto Wreckers, Inc. v. Village of Ridgefield Park Zoning Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 2026

"[T]he Board 'has the choice of accepting or rejecting the testimony of witnesses. Where reasonably made, such choice is conclusive on appeal.'" Kramer v. … T.B. v. Novia, 472 N.J. Super. 80, 93 (App. Div. 2022) citing Do-Wop Corp. v.

Gutermuth v. Ropiecki

159 N.J. Super. 139 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1977

Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co., 1 N.J. Super. 532 (Ch. Div. 1948), the welfare board took a deed and paid off a mortgage on the property without being aware of defendant's judgment. … Louis, 101 U.S. 306 , 25 L.Ed. 999 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U.S. 654 , 17 S.Ct. 453 , 45 L.Ed. 865 .

In the Matter of County of Atlantic and Pba Local 243 And

445 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 2016

Eighteen years later, in Board of Education Township of Neptune v. … Bd. of Educ. v. Jackson Educ. Ass'n ex rel. Scelba, 334 N.J. Super. 162, 171 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 165 N.J. 678 (2000). See also Brown v. City of Jersey City, 289 N.J.

Borough of Saddle River v. Bobinski

108 N.J. Super. 6 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 5, 1969

State v. Accera, 36 N.J. Super. 420 ( App. Div. 1955); Martin v. Cestone, 33 N.J. Super. 267, 269 ( App. Div. 1954), Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 104 (1957). … Repair of a structure has been held to show an intention to continue rather than to abandon a nonconforming use. 2 Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice (3 d ed. 1965), § 16-13, at 275; Brown v.

Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. New Jersey Real State Commission

242 N.J. Super. 354 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 1990

Board of Pharmacy of New Jersey, 465 U.S. 1095 , 104 S.Ct. 1583 , 80 L.Ed.2d 117 (1984); Coldwell Banker Res. v. Mo. Real Estate Com’n, 712 S. W.2d 666 (Mo.1986); Contra, Coldwell Banker Res. Real Estate v. … Brown v. City of Newark, 113 N.J. 565, 572 , 552 A.2d 125 (1989). Residential buyers and sellers were reasonably seen by the Legislature to need protection against distraction by brokers’ extraneous inducements.

Wnuck v. NJ Div. of Motor Vehicles

337 N.J. Super. 52 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 2001

Co., 307 N.J.Super. 93, 102 , 704 A. 2d 562 (App.Div.1997); Krupp v. Board of Educ. of Union Cty. Reg. … R & R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A. 2d 1 (1999). Absent arbitrary, unreasonable or capricious action, the agency's determination must be affirmed. Ibid.

Wasyluk v. Mack Manufacturing Corp.

4 N.J. Super. 559 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 8, 1949

Hopper v. Edwards, 88 N.J.L. 471 ; Taylor v. Rector, etc., Christ Church, 118 N.J. Eq. 288 . … The appellant relies heavily upon the cases of Kieckhefer Container Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission of New Jersey, its Board of Review and John Bowen, 125 N.J.L. 52 , and Kieckhefer Container Co. v.

State of New Jersey v. Alfred J. Smith

436 N.J. Super. 556 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 29, 2014

See State v. … During the Wade hearing, the black pants and brown windbreaker morphed to "something black and something brown."

Butkera v. Hudson River Sloop "Clearwater", Inc.

300 N.J. Super. 550 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 12, 1997

See, e.g., Brown v. St. Venantius School, 111 N.J. 325 , 544 A.2d 842 (1988); DeVries v. Habited for Humanity, 290 N.J.Super. 479 , 676 A.2d 152 (App.Div.1996), aff'd 147 N.J. 619 , 689 A.2d 142 (1997); Glowacki v. … Schultz v.

Abelson's, Inc. V.N.J. State Board of Optometrists

3 N.J. Super. 332 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 1949

State Board of Optometrists v. S.S. … Harris v. State Board of Optometrical Examiners, 135 A. 237 , 287 Pa. 531 .

Federbush v. Bd. of Educ. of Borough of Carteret

6 N.J. Super. 70 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1949

Justice Heher, speaking for the Court of Errors and Appeals in Greenway v. … Board of Education of Camden, 129 N.J.L. 461 (1943), at pp. 463 and 464, said: "The local boards are not under a statutory duty to lay down a schedule of salary increments.

RASHONNA COSBY-HURLING VS. LOCAL FINANCE BOARD (LOCAL FINANCE BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS) (CONSOLIDATED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 2019

We therefore vacate the Board's order finding Brown violated N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.5(c), affirm the Board's order denying Brown's motion for a summary decision finding he did not violate the statute and remand for further … In A-5528-16, we reverse the Board's summary decision order finding Brown violated N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.5(c), affirm the Board's order denying Brown's motion for a summary decision dismissing the charge he violated N.J.S.A