Case law

Werlock v. Bd. of Education of Twp. of Woodbridge

5 N.J. Super. 140 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 1949

Under the circumstances the Board was within its right in abolishing the appellant's position. Weider v. Board of Education of High Bridge, 112 N.J.L. 289 ( Sup. Ct. ). … Harker v. City of Bayonne, 85 N.J.L. 176 ( E. A. 1913). In fact, by the questions for determination submitted by the appellant he must be held to concede this point, if the action of the Board was in good faith.

State v. Hendricks

145 N.J. Super. 27 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 8, 1976

The usual connecting doors to each room had been boarded up or otherwise sealed. The first floor also contained a common kitchen and bathroom. … State v.

Art Ammermuller v. Borough of Belmar Zoning Board of Adjustment

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 2025

MATTHEWS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … Advance at Branchburg II, LLC v. Twp. of Branchburg Bd. of Adjustment, 433 N.J. Super. 247, 252 (App. Div. 2013). We defer to decisions of local boards if they are adequately supported by the record, Lang v.

State v. Cleveland

371 N.J. Super. 286 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 2004

Brown, 118 N.J. 595, 604 , 573 A. 2d 886 (1990). … They did not enter Brown's room for the purpose of searching it. A search was not required; defendant's presence was apparent. Cf. United States v.

Exxon Corp. v. Mack

237 N.J. Super. 16 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 28, 1989

Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc., 108 N.J. 123, 128 (1987); Coletti v. Union Co., C. … Consequently, BP is not entitled to the convening of a board of arbitration. II.

Del. Riv. & Bay Auth. v. NJ Pub. Emp. ReL Com.

112 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 1970

State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415 (1956); State v. Bander, 56 N.J. 196 (1970); Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1 , 82 S.Ct. 585 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 492 (1962). … Justice Francis pointed to this danger in Burlington County Evergreen Park Mental Hospital v. Cooper, supra : at pp. 598-599. As we said in Lullo v.

Protomastro v. Bd. of Adjustment, City of Hoboken

3 N.J. Super. 539 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 14, 1949

Protomastro v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Hoboken, 1 N.J. Super. 102 , 62 A.2d 694 . … Brandon v. Montclair, 124 N.J.L. 135 ; Id., 125 N.J.L. 367 ; Potts v. Princeton, 133 N.J.L. 230 ; Ackerman v. Board of Comm'rs, supra. The proofs are dispositive that this is the situation here.

State v. Vonderfecht

284 N.J. Super. 555 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 24, 1995

Tung-Sol Electric, Inc. v. Board of Review, 35 N.J. Super. 397, 401 , 114 A. 2d 285 (App.Div. 1955); Kugler v. Banner Pontiac-Buick, Opel, Inc., 120 N.J. Super. 572, 577 , 295 A. 2d 385 (Ch.Div. 1972). … See State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415 , 126 A. 2d 161 (1956). In short, the defendant, in the view of the arresting officer, at the time in question, was a disorderly person.

KAITLYN SHEEDY v. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 27, 2022

The scope of our review of the Board's decision is limited. Allstars Auto Grp., Inc. v. N.J. Motor Vehicle Comm'n, 234 N.J. 150, 157 (2018). … "In reviewing a final agency decision, such as that of the Board . . ., we defer to fact-findings that are supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record." McClain v.

Geyer v. Faiella

279 N.J. Super. 386 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1995

GEYER, SR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ALFRED L. FAIELLA AND BROWN & BROWN, P.C., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 10, 1995. … (Brown) is a member of the Brown firm.

Jersey City Board of Education v. State of New Jersey

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 2025

A-3642-22 JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION and G.D., a minor, by his guardian ad litem, NICOLE GOHDE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DR. … As a result, certain 3 See Abbott v.

Mirco Kaja v. Borough of West Long Branch Planning Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 2025

A zoning board's decisions "enjoy a presumption of validity, and a court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion." Price v. … Giving all due deference to the decision of a board, the trial court must determine whether the board's resolution is supported by "substantial evidence in the record." Lang v.

In re the Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso

140 N.J. Super. 500 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 1976

Board member.” … J. 335, 341 (1960); State v. Fary, 19 N. J. 431, 434 (1955); State v. Browning, 19 N. J. 424 (1955).

Hartman v. Federal Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.

11 N.J. Super. 611 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1951

Federer with fracture boards and a heating pad, being admitted to the hospital in February *614 of 1948. … Indeed, in view of the admitted identity of locale and type of injury, from beginning to end, it is quite clear petitioner here does not fall within the line of cases of which Brown v.

State of New Jersey v. Michael Nunez

436 N.J. Super. 70 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 10, 2014

[State v. Mingo, 77 N.J. 576, 587 (1978).] … See State v.

Dolan v. City of East Orange

287 N.J. Super. 136 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1996

Brown, Lofton, Childress & Wolfe, attorneys for appellants ( Rashidah N. Hasan, on the brief). … See Perrella v. Board of Educ., 51 N.J. 323, 332 , 240 A. 2d 417 (1968). As such, a disciplined employee ordinarily has a right of appeal to the Merit System Board. N.J.S.A. 11A:2-14; see Carr v.

Dewey v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.

216 N.J. Super. 347 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1986

DEWEY, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., R.J. REYNOLDS INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN BRANDS, INC., AND BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS. … Brown & Williamson moves for summary judgment based upon the recent Third Circuit decision in Cipollone v.

River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.

51 N.J. Super. 447 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 1958

Townsend v. Brown, 24 N.J.L. 80, 87 ( Sup. Ct. 1853); Hetfield v. Central R.R. Co., 29 N.J.L. 571, 575 ( E. & A. 1862); City of Passaic v. State, 33 N.J. Super. 37, 40 ( App. Div. 1954). … State v. Brown, 27 N.J.L. 13 ( Sup.

State v. Trunfio

58 N.J. Super. 445 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1959

State v. Brown, 72 N.J.L. 354 ( Sup. Ct. 1905), affirmed, o.b. 73 N.J.L. 679 ( E. & A. 1906). In the Brown case the indictment alleged that Singleton & Company was the owner. … . * * *" Defendant argues that the Brown case was, by inference, overruled by State v. Cohen, 105 N.J.L. 529 ( Sup. Ct. 1929). That is not so.

State v. Perez

218 N.J. Super. 478 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1987

He was sentenced to five years imprisonment and ordered to pay $25 to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. On appeal defendant contends: 1. … Likewise, in Avila, supra, 353 A. 2d at 776 , minutes before being apprehended at a railroad station, police saw defendant toss a brown bag he was carrying over a fence. Id. at 778.