Case law

Saldana v. DiMedio

275 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 18, 1994

Super. 488 (1994) 646 A.2d 522 MARCELINO SALDANA AND JUANA SALDANA, OLIO ROWAN, NOEMI SANTANA, JUAN AND EDITH ROSADO, GEORGE AND HELEN BROWN, TEODOSIA LOPEZ, RODOLFO AND IDA ROBLEDO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. LEONARD J. … According to Richardson, Camden had to continually board up certain buildings, but they would not remain boarded up.

Sanchez v. Department of Human Services

314 N.J. Super. 11 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 1998

See also Brown v. City of Newark, 113 N.J. 565, 573-74 , 552 A.2d 125 (1989). The nature of the right affected by the statute is a well-established, fundamental right to travel, recognized by New Jersey courts. … Snider, 2 F.Supp.2d 720 (W.D.Pa.1997) (sixty-day durational residency requirement for cash assistance fails both strict scrutiny and rational relationship tests); Brown v.

State v. Abreu

257 N.J. Super. 549 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1992

Compare Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 660 (1979); Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 357 (1979). The request for a consent to search was entirely proper. … The defendants both had denied ownership and neither had protested the search of the brown bag. State v. Lee, 245 N.J. Super. 441, 449-450 , 586 A. 2d 256 (App.Div. 1991).

State v. Lee

235 N.J. Super. 410 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 10, 1989

Ghertler, 114 N.J. 383 (1989); State v. Roth, supra, 95 N.J. at 363-64; see also, e.g., State v. Jarbath, 114 N.J. 394 (1989); State v. … State v.

Matthew Calio v. Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders, Etc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 2025

Relying on Hansen v. … Townsend v. Pierre, 221 N.J. 36, 59 (2015).

Laura Germinario v. Westwood Regional Board of Education

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 2023

See Tarr v. … See Meade v.

Fox v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills

199 N.J. Super. 82 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1985

See Brown v. Brown, supra, 86 N.J. at 580 ; Shuttleworth v. Conti Constr. Co., Inc., 193 N.J. Super. 469, 474 (App.Div. 1984); Paternoster v. N.J. Transp. Dept., 190 N.J. … In sum, we read Brown v.

Lehrhaupt v. Flynn

129 N.J. Super. 327 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1974

and planning board. … attorney and planning board attorney.

In Re Tideland's License 96-0114-T

326 N.J. Super. 209 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 29, 1999

Brown v. Morris Canal and Banking Co., 27 N.J.L. 648, 653-54 (E. & A. 1858); Bailey v. … . & A.1941); Shamberg v. Board of Riparian Commr's, 72 N.J.L. 132, 135 , 60 A. 43 (Sup.Ct.1905).

State v. Federico

198 N.J. Super. 120 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 28, 1984

We note that under State v. … State v. Magee, 52 N.J. at 376 ; State v.

Albigese v. City of Jersey City

127 N.J. Super. 101 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 14, 1974

Brown, 111 N.J. Super. 477, 480 (Cty. … The Board is authorized to grant such a rent increase, after hearing, if the improvement is truly a capital one.

John Valentine v. Zoning Board of the Township of Monroe

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 9, 2025

"[A] court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion." Price v. Himeji, LLC, 214 N.J. 263, 284 (2013). … Here, we are satisfied that the Board made detailed factual findings justifying the positive and negative statutory requirements to grant the use variance. See N.J.S.A. 40:55D-10g(2); Medici v.

In Re Brown

112 N.J. Eq. 499 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1933

Brown, Jr., and Robert S. … Davison v. Rake, 45 N.J. Eq. 767 ; Ashton v. Wilkinson, 53 N.J. Eq. 227 ; O'Leary v. Smock, 95 N.J. Eq. 276 .

Gregory Royal v. New Jersey State Parole Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 2023

A-2680-21 GREGORY ROYAL, Appellant, v. … "Our review of the Parole Board's determination[s] is deferential in light of its expertise in the specialized area of parole supervision . . . ." J.I. v. N.J.

State v. McCarthy

123 N.J. Super. 513 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 1973

Brown v. State, 62 N.J.L. 666, 695 (E. & A. 1898), aff'd 175 U.S. 172 , 20 S.Ct. 77 , 44 L.Ed. 119 (1899). N.J.S.A. 2A:169-3 has broadened this. … State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415-416 (1956); Watson v. Jaffe, 121 N.J. Super. 213, 214 (App. Div. 1972); State v. Federanko, 26 N.J. 119, 129-130 (1958).

Maietta v. NJ Racing Comm'n

183 N.J. Super. 397 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 23, 1982

See, e.g., Yannuzzi *402 v. U.S. Cas. Co., 19 N.J. 201, 211 (1955); Beneficial Finance Co., Atlantic City v. Swaggerty, 170 N.J. Super. 398 (App.Div. 1979), rev'd 86 N.J. 602 (1981); Brown v. Shaw, 174 N.J. … See, e.g., State v. Dolce, 178 N.J. Super. 275, 285 (App.Div. 1981); Dare v. State, 159 N.J. Super. 533 (App.Div. 1978); Jersey Downs, Inc. v. Div. of N.J. *405 Racing Comm., 102 N.J. Super. 451 (App.Div. 1968).

State v. Rajnai

132 N.J. Super. 530 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 1975

State v. Reyes, supra ; State v. Brown, 67 N.J. Super. 450, 454-455 (App. Div. 1961). Possession need not be exclusive but may be jointly exercised by two or more persons. State v. Puckett, 67 N.J. Super. 365, 376 (App. … State v. Brown, 99 N.J. Super. 22, 27 (App. Div. 1968), certif. den. 51 N.J. 468 (1968) Clearly there was no abuse of discretion here.

Werlock v. Bd. of Education of Twp. of Woodbridge

5 N.J. Super. 140 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 1949

Under the circumstances the Board was within its right in abolishing the appellant's position. Weider v. Board of Education of High Bridge, 112 N.J.L. 289 ( Sup. Ct. ). … Harker v. City of Bayonne, 85 N.J.L. 176 ( E. A. 1913). In fact, by the questions for determination submitted by the appellant he must be held to concede this point, if the action of the Board was in good faith.

Brandan Arms v. New Jersey State Parole Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 20, 2023

"Our review of the Parole Board's determination is deferential in light of its expertise in the specialized area of parole supervision." J.I. v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 228 N.J. 204, 230 (2017) (citing McGowan v. N.J. … Board's decision-making function involves individualized discretionary appraisals." Trantino v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 166 N.J. 113, 201 (2001) (citing Beckworth v. N.J.

Dupree v. City of Clifton

351 N.J. Super. 237 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 2002

); Restivo v. … In Christmas v.