Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.03s

  • G.D.M. v. Board of Education

    427 N.J. Super. 246 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 24, 2012

    Local school boards function subordinate to, and in conformance with, the regulating guidelines promulgated by the Commissioner and the State Board of Education. Bd. of Educ. of Plainfield v. … D’Annunzio v. Prudential Ins.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Goldstein v. Planning Board

    272 N.J. Super. 359 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 1993

    Harrington Glen v. Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Leonia, 52 N.J. 22, 27-28 , 243 A.2d 233 (1968). … Divan Builders v. Wayne Tp. Planning Board, 66 N.J. 582, 595-97 , 334 A.2d 30 (1975).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF R.G. (SVP-83-00, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 2019

    v. … Brown, 348 N.J. Super. 466, 478 (App. Div. 2002))). The inapposite United States Supreme Court's decisions cited by R.G. in advancing this argument – Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), Graham v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Edmondson v. Board of Education

    424 N.J. Super. 256 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 2012

    See Twp. of Winslow v. … Officials v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hemsey v. Board of Trustees

    393 N.J. Super. 524 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 2007

    Based on our decision in Kossup v. … Corp. v. Fairman, 39 N.J. 61, 72 , 187 A.2d 1 (1962).

    Reversed on other grounds by Hemsey v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 198 N.J. 215 (2009)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Alicea v. Board of Review

    432 N.J. Super. 347 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 28, 2013

    We agree with Alicea that the procedures utilized here violated his due process rights as delineated in Rivera v. Board of Review, 127 N.J. 578 , 606 A.2d 1087 (1992). … Alfonso v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gerber v. Board of Review

    36 N.J. Super. 322 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1955

    Tea Co. v. New Jersey Department of Labor & Industry, Division of Unemployment Compensation, 29 N. J. Super. 26, 30 (App. Div. 1953); Ablondi v. Board of Review, etc., 8 N. J. Super. 71, 76 (App. Div. 1950). … Ct. 1947); Midvale Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 165 Pa. Super. 359 , 67 A. 2d 380 (Super. Ct. 1949).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • DeSantis v. Board of Review

    149 N.J. Super. 35 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 22, 1977

    Super. 35 (1977) 372 A.2d 1362 ROSEMARY DeSANTIS, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, AND CITIZENS UNITED BANK, RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Board of Review, &c. v. Kearfott Mfg. Corp., 46 N.J. Super. 39 (App. Div. 1957).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Shea v. Board of Trustees

    116 N.J. Super. 348 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1971

    SHEA, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE & FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DIVISION OF PENSIONS, DEPT. OF TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … This language parallels that contained in N.J.S.A. 43:15A-43, part of the Public Employees' Retirement System Act ( N.J.S.A. 43:15A-6 et seq. ), with which we dealt in Hillman v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Dennis v. Board of Trustees

    394 N.J. Super. 484 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 2007

    See, e.g., Muller v. Bd. of Trs., Police and Firemen’s Ret. … See discussion in Angiola v. Bd. of Trs., Public Employees' Ret. Sys., 359 N.J.Super. 552 , 557 n. 1, 821 A.2d 98 (App.Div.2003). See, e.g., Caminiti v. Bd. of Trs. Police and Firemen's Ret.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hancock v. Board of Review

    46 N.J. Super. 418 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 1957

    HANCOCK, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued August 26, 1957. … The decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rost v. Board of Education

    137 N.J. Super. 76 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 13, 1975

    In this action against the board of education under the Tort Claims Act, N. J. S. … We are in substantial agreement with the rationale expressed in the opinion of Judge Demos in Vedutis v. Tesi, 135 N. J.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Board of Trustees

    421 N.J. Super. 43 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 13, 2011

    Super. 43 Shonda HAYES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. Docket No. A-2967-09T1. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Thurber v. City of Burlington, 191 N.J. 487, 502 , 924 A. 2d 533 (2007).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Borgia v. Board of Review

    21 N.J. Super. 462 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 26, 1952

    Daley v. Board of Police Com'rs of East Hartford, 133 Conn. 716 , 54 A. 2 d 501, 502 ( Sup. Ct. Err. 1947). … Div. 1945); Turner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Rev., 163 Pa. Super. 168 , 60 A. 2 d 583 (1948); Von Kaenel v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Rev., 163 Pa. Super. 173 , 60 A. 2 d 586 (1948).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • KRAYNIAK v. Board of Trustees

    412 N.J. Super. 232 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 2010

    Super. 232 John KRAYNIAK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Public Employees' Retirement System, Respondent-Respondent. DOCKET NO. A-2578-08T3. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Therefore, the Board's decision is not entitled to deference because appellate courts are "in no way bound by the agency's interpretation of a statute or its determination of a strictly legal issue." Utley v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Motley v. Borough of Seaside Park Zoning Board of Adjustment

    430 N.J. Super. 132 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 2013

    Behlen & Bros. v. … v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Passarella v. Board of Commissioners

    1 N.J. Super. 313 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 1949

    State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Company, 118 N.J. Eq. 504 (E. A. 1935). … State Board of Tax Appeals, 134 N.J.L. at p. 48 (Sup.Ct. 1946) and Kravis v. Hock, 137 N.J.L. 252 (Sup.Ct. 1948). Appellant cites the cases of Warren Street Chapel v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Barney v. Board of Trustees

    238 N.J. Super. 556 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1990

    Board of Trustees, 113 N.J. 169 , 549 A. 2d 1213 (1988) and Ciecwisz v. Board of Trustees, 113 N.J. 180 , 549 A. 2d 1218 (1988). To the extent that Quigley v. Board of Trustees, 231 N.J. … Finally, the Quigley analysis is in conflict with the principles discussed in Kane v. Board of Trustees, supra , Maynard v. Board of Trustees, supra , and Ciecwisz v. Board of Trustees, supra .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Washington Township Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Washington Township Planning Board

    217 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1987

    Bd. of Adj. v. Service Elec. … In Bergen County v. Port of N.Y.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Shuster v. Board of Review

    396 N.J. Super. 240 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 2007

    (employer), appeals a final decision of the Board of Review (Board). The Board accepted the findings and opinion of the Appeal Tribunal and disqualified Shuster from receiving *243 unemployment compensation benefits. … Smith v. Ricci, 89 N.J. 514, 525 , 446 A.2d 501 , appeal dismissed sub nom. Smith v. Brandt, 459 U.S. 962 , 103 S.Ct. 286 , 74 L.Ed.2d 272 (1982); City of Newark v. Natural Res.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.