Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.86s

  • Ernest Turner v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 2026

    A-3124-23 ERNEST TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Piatt v. Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys., 443 N.J. Super. 80, 99 (App. Div. 2015) (quoting St. Peter's Univ. Hosp. v. Lacy, 185 N.J. 1, 13 (2005)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lebron v. Sanchez

    407 N.J. Super. 204 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 2009

    Super. 204 Dinesha LEBRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luis SANCHEZ, Carmen Vargas and City of Camden, Defendants, and Camden City Board of Education, and Sharpe Elementary School, Defendants-Respondents. No. … Lowe v. Zarghami, 158 N.J. 606, 629 , 731 A. 2d 14 (1999) (quoting Murray v. Brown, 259 N.J.Super. 360, 365 , 613 A. 2d 502 (Law Div.1991)).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Julio L. Vasquez v. Board of Review

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 2026

    VASQUEZ, Appellant, v. … Vasquez appealed to the Board.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Randolph

    441 N.J. Super. 533 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 7, 2015

    Brown, supra, 216 N.J. at 530, 83 A.3d 45 (quoting United States v. … Unlike the neighboring houses, the residence in question was not boarded up. Id. at 523 , 83 A.3d 45 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Ditscher v. Booth

    13 N.J. Super. 568 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1951

    Brown, attorney for the defendants. HANEMAN, J.S.C. Plaintiff brings suit upon two counts. In the first count he alleges that he and the defendant, Elsie M. … Kurth v. Maier, 133 N.J. Eq. 388 ( E. & A. 1943); Jackson v. Hooper, 76 N.J. Eq. 185 ( Ch. 1909).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Robert A. Stretch, Inc.

    44 N.J. Super. 52 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1957

    State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405 (1956); Giles v. Gassert, 23 N.J. 22 (1956). … Friedman v. Stein, 4 N.J. 34 (1950). A statute in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed. Carlo v. Okonite-Callender Cable Co., 3 N.J. 253 (1949); Friedman v. Stein, supra .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Verna v. Links at Valleybrook

    371 N.J. Super. 77 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 2004

    Roy, 401 U.S. 265, 271 , 91 S.Ct. 621, 625 , 28 L.Ed. 2d 35 (1971) (candidate for the United States Senate), but also candidates for public office on a local level, see Brown v. … Brown, 751 P.2d 939, 941 (Alaska 1988) (doctor seeking appointing to medical board), and union office, see Materia v. Huff, 394 Mass. 328 , 475 N.E. 2d 1212, 1215 (1985).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Jermaine De Pina v. Board of Review

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 2026

    A-3285-23 JERMAINE DE PINA, Appellant, v. … Div. 2008) (quoting R & R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Brown Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 178 (1999)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sergio Tandoc v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 2026

    [Allstars Auto Group, Inc. v. … Patterson, 194 N.J. at 50; see also Lehmann v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • America on Wheels, Eatontown, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Eatontown

    178 N.J. Super. 155 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 1981

    For the reasons set forth in our opinion in the companion case of Supercade Cherry Hill, Inc., v. … Home Builders League v. Berlin, 81 N.J. 127 (1979); State v. Baker, 81 N.J. 99 (1979). In view of this disposition, the variance issue has been mooted.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Susan J. Carney v. Board of Review

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 2, 2026

    CARNEY, Appellant, v. … Berta v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 473 N.J. Super. 284, 302 (App. Div. 2022) (quoting Henry v. Rahway State Prison, 81 N.J. 571, 579-80 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Peschek v. Teissere

    30 N.J. Super. 248 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 1954

    Burford v. Bridwell, 165 P. 2 d 617 ( Okl. Sup. Ct. 1946). The decision is apparently expressive of the practice in that state. Vide, Durham v. Brown, 164 Okl. 139 , 24 P. 2 d 295 ( Sup Ct. 1933); Miller v. … See, Gas & By-Product Coke Workers, Local Union No. 12018 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 244 Wis. 258 , 12 N.W. 2 d 36 ( Sup. Ct. 1943).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • HOUSING AUTH., BAYONNE v. Isler

    127 N.J. Super. 568 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 1974

    Brown v. Milwaukee Housing Authority, 471 F. 2d 63 (7 Cir.1972); Milwaukee Housing Authority v. Mosby, 53 Wis. 2d 275 , 192 N.W. 2d 913 (Sup. Ct. 1972). See also, Lee v. Elizabeth Housing Authority, 119 N.J. … It wrote her requesting that she appear before a tenant grievance board of the Authority on February 27, 1973.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Ball

    219 N.J. Super. 501 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 7, 1987

    See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 739-740 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 502 (1983); see generally 1 LaFave, supra, § 2.5(c). … Texas v. Brown, supra, 460 U.S. at 740 , 103 S.Ct. at *508 1542.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Conklin v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Retirement System Division of Pensions

    135 N.J. Super. 131 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1975

    Accordingly, the determination of the board is affirmed. In the second appeal, docket No. … J. 368, 375 (1971); Swan v. Bd. of Trustees of Teachers’ Pension Fund, 85 N. J. Super. 226 (App. Div. 1964); Ziegler v. State, 95 N. J. Super. 273 (App. Div. 1967); Reinhold v. Irvington, 134 N. J. L. 416 (Sup.

    Reversed on other grounds by Conklin v. City of East Orange, 73 N.J. 198 (1977)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • West Orange Licensed Beverage Ass'n v. Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control of West Orange

    135 N.J. Super. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1975

    [Aldom v. Roseland, 42 N. J. Super. 495, 501 (App. … Hochberg v. Freehold, 40 N. J. Super. 276, 284 (App. Div. 1956), certif. den. 22 N. J. 223 (1956). See also, Aldom v. Roseland, supra; Zell v. Roseland, 42 N. J. Super. 75 (App. Div. 1956).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carol Taylor v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 4, 2025

    Co., Inc. v. Bureau of Sec., 64 N.J. 85, 93 (1973)). … State v. Jenewicz, 193 N.J. 440, 466 (2008) (quoting Johnson v. Salem Corp., 97 N.J. 78, 91 (1984)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sanna v. National Sponge Co.

    209 N.J. Super. 60 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 1986

    If you're talking about a board, there was boards there, yes. Q: All right. … See Brown v. United States Co., 98 N.J. 155, 171-173 , (1984).

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Simmons v. Loose

    418 N.J. Super. 206 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 2011

    In Siligato v. … In making that determination, the judge applied the "intended beneficiary" test established in National Board of YMCA v. United States, 395 U.S. 85 , 89 S.Ct. 1511 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 117 (1969).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jeffrey Almeida v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 2025

    A-2712-23 JEFFREY ALMEIDA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … We accord deference to the Board's fact-finding, Circus Liquors, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.