Case law

Newcomb Sales & Services Corp. v. New Jersey State Board of Pharmacy

218 N.J. Super. 69 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 5, 1987

Respondent board’s concern that “complete service” would not be rendered to the community is likewise unfounded and conjectural. Packard Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. … Smith v.

Saddle Brook Realty, LLC v. Township of Saddle Brook Zoning Board of Adjustment

388 N.J. Super. 67 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 11, 2006

to amend or revise the [zoning] plan .... ” Vidal v. … However, “[a] variance may not be based upon a conclusion by a board of adjustment that there is no factual justification for the regulation as an act of legislation.” Bern v.

Salem County Improvement Authority v. Salem County Board of Chosen Freeholders

436 N.J. Super. 16 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 2014

Co. v. Borough of S. Plainfield Bd. of Adj., 160 N.J. 1, 14 , 733 A.2d 442 (1999) (quoting Smart SMR v. Borough of Fair Lawn Bd. of Adj., 152 N.J. 309, 327 , 704 A.2d 1271 (1998); Sica v. … Georgia v. Suruda, 154 N.J.Super. 439, 448 , 381 A.2d 821 (Ch.Div. 1977). Even when the outgoing board has the power, “for an outgoing administration to make such appointments may be unwise public policy.” Cucci v.

Berzito v. Gambino

119 N.J. Super. 332 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1972

The tenant has only the alternative remedies of making the repairs or removing from the premises upon such a constructive eviction [Emphasis added] In Academy Spires, Inc. v. Brown, 111 N.J. Super. 477 (Cty. D. … Academy Spires, Inc. v. Brown, supra at 484; cf. Javins v. First National Realty Corporation, 428 F. 2d 1071 , 1079 (D.C. Cir.1970), cert. den. 400 U.S. 925 , 91 S.Ct. 186 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 185 (1970).

MAGASINY ONIC DEVICES, INC. v. Precision Specialties, Inc.

91 N.J. Super. 546 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1966

Decided July 1, 1966. *547 Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN. Mr. Arthur E. Ballen argued the cause for the appellants. Mr. James Hunter, III, argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. … Servs., Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Life Ins. Co., 257 Minn. 184 , 100 N.W. 2 d 819, 82 A.L.R. 2 d 1004 ( Sup. Ct. 1960); Kennoy v. Graves, 300 S.W. 2 d 568 ( Ky. Ct. App. 1957); Loewy v. A. Rosenthal, Inc., 104 F.

Route 440 Developers, LLC v. Planning Board of the City of Jersey City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 2026

"[T]he law presumes that boards of adjustment and municipal governing bodies will act fairly and with proper motives and for valid reasons." Fallone Props., L.L.C. v. … Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Hamilton Township, 92 N.J. 466, 476 (1983); Star Enter. v. Wilder, 268 N.J. Super. 371, 375-77 (App. Div. 1993); D'Anna v. Planning Bd. of Washington Township, 256 N.J. Super. 78, 82-83 (App.

State v. Williams

214 N.J. Super. 12 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1986

He also imposed a $500 Violent Crimes Compensation Board penalty. … State v. Lyle, 73 N.J. 403 (1977); Atamanik v. Real Estate Management, Inc., 21 N.J. Super. 357 (App. Div. 1952). Moreover, an Evid.

Borough of Lincoln Park v. Cullari

15 N.J. Super. 210 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 31, 1951

Wogish v. Board of Health, Moonachie, 114 N.J.L. 261 ( E. & A. 1935). … Brown v. Klein, 133 N.J.L. 533 ( Sup. Ct. 1946). A similar ordinance limiting the keeping of pigs to not more than ten was held to be a reasonable exercise of the police power. Wogish v.

Paul v. National Educ. Ass'n

195 N.J. Super. 426 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 1984

Lind v. Schmid, 67 N.J. 255, 266 (1975). … The fact that Lissa Brown and Charles McCarty may have had less than a full complement of the characteristics a Utopian world would design for a teacher or a school board member does not establish a want of probable cause

Fuchilla v. Layman

210 N.J. Super. 574 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 27, 1986

As noted in Brown v. United States, 742 F. 2d 1498 , 1509 n. 6 (D.C. Cir.1984), cert. den. sub nom. District of Columbia v. … Brown, supra, 742 F. 2d at 1509 n. 6; Williams, supra, 616 F. Supp. at 657-68 . The only New Jersey authority directly on point is Lloyd v. Stone Harbor, supra, 179 N.J.

Desilets v. Clearview Bd. of Educ.

265 N.J. Super. 370 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1993

Super. 370 (1993) 627 A.2d 667 PATRICIA DESILETS ON BEHALF OF AND AS NATURAL GUARDIAN OF BRIEN DESILETS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CLEARVIEW REGIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION, MICHAEL P. … Responding to the lower court's reliance on the factor of effectiveness of the sobriety checkpoint in combating drunk driving, the Court observed: The actual language from Brown v.

Belleville Educ. Ass'n v. Belleville Bd. of Educ. (In re Belleville Educ. Ass'n)

455 N.J. Super. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 2018

Badiali v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Group , 220 N.J. 544 , 559, 107 A.3d 1281 (2015) ; see also Guido v. Duane Morris LLP , 202 N.J. 79 , 91 n. 4, 995 A.2d 844 (2010) ; Mount Holly Twp. Bd. of Educ. v. Mount Holly Twp. Educ. … V Summary In the appeal by the Board under Docket Number A-5104-14 challenging the decision *501 and order entered by PERC on June 25, 2015, we affirm PERC's decision in all respects.

Council of New Jersey State College Locals v. Trenton State College Board of Trustees

284 N.J. Super. 108 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 18, 1995

Cole v. Woodcliff Lake Bd. of Educ., 155 N.J.Super. 398, 407 , 382 A.2d 966 (Law Div.1978); see also Houman v. … Cases such as Kramer v.

New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of Adjustment

305 N.J. Super. 151 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 1997

Booth v. Board of Adj., Rockaway Tp., 50 N.J. 302, 306 , 234 A.2d 681 (1967). … Number One v. Board of Adjustment of the Township of Kingwood, 272 N.J.Super. 498, 505 , 640 A.2d 356 (Law Div.1993).

State v. Midland Ins.

167 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 16, 1979

Midland Carpet Corp. v. Franklin Assoc. Prop., 90 N. J. Super. 42, 46 (App. Div. 1966) ; U. S. Pipe & Foundry Co. v. American Arbitration Ass’n, 67 N. J. Super. 384, 393 (App. Div. 1961) ; Commonwealth v. Hill, 180 Pa. … See also, State v. Gonzalez, supra, 69 N. J. Super, at 289.

Ellis v. Hilton United Methodist Church

455 N.J. Super. 33 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 2018

Div. 2012), we imposed liability on the owner of a vacant, boarded-up building that had been used for commercial purposes. … City of Hoboken , 207 N.J. 191 , 205, 23 A.3d 912 (2011) ; Brown v. St. Venantius Sch. , 111 N.J. 325 , 333-36, 544 A.2d 842 (1988) ; Mohamed v. Iglesia Evangelica Oasis De Salvacion , 424 N.J.

In Re Jersey City Education Assoc.

115 N.J. Super. 42 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1971

Brown, Daniel Cupo, Gail Hall, Robert Rogenstein and Barbara Schneider, members at large of the executive board, advocated and called a strike by the public school teachers of Jersey City. … Delaware River and Bay Authority v. International Organization, etc., 45 N.J. 138 (1965); Board of Education, Union Beach v.

Township of Stafford v. Stafford Township Zoning Board of Adjustment & Hugh Schultz

299 N.J. Super. 188 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1997

Grundlehner v. Dangler, 29 N.J. 256, 263 , 148 A.2d 806 (1959). … However, in Zoning Bd. of Adj. of Green Brook Tp. v.

LIMA PARTNERS v. Borough of Northvale

219 N.J. Super. 512 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 12, 1987

Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment, Chatham Tp., 202 N.J. Super. 312, 324 (App.Div. 1985) (an accessory use "... must be one which is subordinate and minor in significance"). … See Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment, Chatham Tp., supra, 202 N.J. Super. at 328-330 ; Yahnel v. Jamesburg Bd. of Adjustment, 79 N.J. Super. 509 (App.Div. 1963), certif. den. 41 N.J. 116 (1963).

Higgins v. Denver

85 N.J. Super. 277 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 1964

Jacoby v. Brown, 55 N.J. Super. 469 ( Law Div. 1959), is the only reported decision on the question. … Since the question has now been settled by statute, and since a decision on the correctness of Jacoby v. Brown is not necessary for the determination of the issues in this case, we decline to pass on the question now.