Case law

United States v. Norwood

948 F. Supp. 374 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 15, 1996

Brown refused, the Defendant leaned into his car, and tried to undo his seat belt. After failing in these attempts to take Mr. Brown’s car, the Defendant pointed a loaded semiautomatic handgun at Mr. … Brown’s head, while the Defendant’s accomplice stated, "just kill, him.” 4 .

IBS Financial Corp. v. Seidman & Associates, L.L.C.

954 F. Supp. 980 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 23, 1997

See, e.g., Chris-Craft Indus. v. … In Scott v.

Garcia v. Richard Stockton College of New Jersey

210 F. Supp. 2d 545 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 11, 2002

See Raygor v. … The Board’s 12(b)(6) Motion The Board also argues that Garcia has failed to state a claim against it. According to the Board, the Amended Complaint alleges wrongdoing only by Farris personally, rather than by the Board.

FIELDS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVEL RECORDS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 5, 2023

App’x. 902, 904 (3d Cir. 2004) (citing Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 (1983). “There is a strong presumption that the [Board] has discharged its duty faithfully.” Id. (citing Neal v. … The Board is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and the Court grants summary judgment. V.

THORPE v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 13, 2023

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MEMORANDUM OPINION PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendants. … Plaintiff alleges that she is therefore “highly concerned that this clear inconsistency suggests there may be other omissions or errors in the information presented to the Board” that the Board relied upon in denying her

Johnson v. Fauver

786 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 18, 1992

Thomas v. … Power v. State of N.J., 772 F.2d 35, 39 (1985) (citing Mills v. Green, 159, U.S. 651, 653, 16 S.Ct. 132, 132-33 , 40 L.Ed. 293 (1895)).

Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Local 94 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

140 F. Supp. 2d 384 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 6, 2001

See Brown v. … Brown, 48 F.Supp.2d at 122 .

United States v. First National State Bancorporation

499 F. Supp. 793 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 23, 1980

Brown Shoe Co. v. … United States v. Marine Bancorporation, 418 U.S. 602, 618 , 94 S.Ct. 2856, 2868 , 41 L.Ed.2d 978 (1974); Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 324 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); United States v.

Cuneo v. Essex County & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters & Millwrights, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners

207 F. Supp. 932 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 16, 1962

For, as already noted in LeBus v. … Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters, etc. v.

Coyer v. Hemmer

901 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 27, 1995

Estelle v. … Abramowittz v. Posner, 672 F.2d 1025, 1030 (2d Cir.1982). When a board refuses a demand, the only issues to be examined are whether the board acted in good faith and acted reasonably in conducting the investigation.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF THE UAW GROUP HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN v. ACOSTA

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 14, 2023

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : BOARD OF TRUSTEES … United States v. Jones, 158 F.R.D. 309, 314 (D.N.J. 1994).

Thermoid Co. v. United Rubber Workers of America, Local No. 83, C.I.O.

70 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 13, 1947

In the case of Sutherland et al. v. … Berger v. Clouser, D.C., 36 F.Supp. 168, 170 ; United States v. Brownley, D.C., 34 F.Supp. 923, 924 .

United States v. Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers

581 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 8, 1984

See Bannon v. … As former Chief Judge Brown states in United States v.

Pokol v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Inc.

963 F. Supp. 1361 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 20, 1997

Co. v. … See Allison v.

In Re SFBC International, Inc. Securities & Derivative Litigation

495 F. Supp. 2d 477 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 25, 2007

Kanter v. Barella, 489 F.3d 170 , 180 (3d Cir.2007) (quoting Guttman v. Huang, 823 A.2d 492 (Del.Ch.2003)). On the date the first derivative suit was filed, the PDG board consisted of six directors. … An evenly divided board satisfies the requirement that a majority of the board be unable to consider a demand impartially. See Beam ex rel. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v.

In Re Cendant Corp. Derivative Action Litigation

96 F. Supp. 2d 394 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 14, 2000

To bypass demand, plaintiff must plead that a majority of the board is interested. See, e.g., Abrams v. … Plaintiff has not plead that a majority of Cendant’s present board is interested. As discussed, half of the current board, not a majority, is interested. See, e.g., Abrams v.

Bradshaw v. Township of Middletown

296 F. Supp. 2d 526 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 4, 2003

Brown v. Pa. Dep’t of Health Emergency Med. Sens. Training Inst., 318 F.3d 473 , 477 (3d Cir.2003). … Brown, 269 F.3d at 216 .

Harrington v. Lauer

888 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 8, 1995

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Plaintiff points out that in the case of Harrington v. Board of Education of the Township of Clinton, OAL Docket No.

United States v. Caribbean Ventures, Ltd.

387 F. Supp. 1256 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 20, 1974

Penn Galvanizing Co. v. Lukens Steel Co., 468 F.2d 1021, 1023 (3d Cir. 1972); Winkleman v. New York Stock Exchange, 445 F.2d 786, 789 (3d Cir. 1971); A. L. K. Corp. v. … Investment Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 308 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1962). Defendants, as well as the government, rely on Hacienda.

ALFORD v. PLUMERI

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 11, 2024

See, e.g., Tingey v. Gardner, 827 F. … See, e.g., Ingram v. Schwab, No. CV 22-1665, 2024 WL 4647630, at *3 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 1, 2024); see also Brown v. Williams, 644 F.